Democratic activists spent the last month pouring their time, energy, and passion behind a 30-year-old filmmaker, Jon Ossoff, who represented the hopes and dreams of the anti-Trump Left. They turned the low-key former Hill staffer into a political celebrity, helped him raise record sums of money for a House race, and even baited President Trump into unleashing a tweetstorm on the off-year congressional contest.
The return on their investment: a candidate who turned in a solid, unspectacular performance that places him in a runoff against former Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handel on June 20. Ossoff finished several points shy of the 50 percent needed to avoid a runoff. Handel nearly doubled the support of her closest Republican rival, a respectable showing for the GOP political veteran.
In the end, voters in this affluent suburban Atlanta district proved the enduring power of partisanship. The overall Republican share of the vote was in line with what Trump won last November. Ossoff barely improved on Hillary Clinton’s performance in the district, despite outspending the opposition. Republicans turned out in healthy numbers to vote on Election Day, neutralizing the higher-than-usual Democratic turnout in early voting.
Presidential politics loomed large in this election, with Ossoff running an explicitly anti-Trump campaign and the president personally engaging in the race with a slew of messages designed to excite the Republican faithful. Trump wasn’t shy about making the race about himself, even though his approval numbers are underwhelming in the traditionally conservative district. The president recorded a robocall and sent out four tweets from his personal account this week, attacking Ossoff as “super-liberal” and urging Republicans in the district to vote.
All sides can find some solace in Tuesday night’s results. Ossoff’s showing gives him a fighting chance in the upcoming runoff. Just getting within striking distance of a majority is a sign of a fired-up Democratic base. If the party can sustain that energy into 2018, it will be a powerful weapon in the midterm elections across the country.
Republicans were able to use their traditional playbook, painting Ossoff as a down-the-line liberal to stunt his momentum. If that strategy works in the midterms, they’ll be well-positioned to hold their House majority. Democrats need to win these types of diverse, affluent Republican districts to regain control of the lower chamber.
Despite his bumpy first 90 days, Trump can claim credit for boosting GOP turnout to healthy midterm levels. The president isn’t particularly popular in this district—Republican polling pegged his favorability just slightly above water—but he helped rally the rank and file. He can now boast that he stopped Ossoff from getting a quick ticket to Congress. All told, it doesn’t look as if many typical Republican voters—even those who don’t care for Trump—were inclined to vote for a Democrat to send a message.
If there’s anything that should concern Democrats, it’s that they know what they’re against but not what they’re for. They’ve mastered the art of mobilization in the age of Trump, but are still struggling to persuade winnable voters. Ossoff’s campaign ads struck all the right notes, portraying him as a fiscal conservative and a pragmatist who’s tough on national security. But on the stump, Ossoff never articulated much beyond bland Democratic talking points.
With their pumped-up base, Democrats should have a productive midterm election. But to capture a House majority, they’ll need to pick off Republican-friendly seats with candidates who can reassure GOP-leaning voters with a moderate message. Balancing the energy of the progressive activists with that sort of pragmatism won’t be an easy task. It can get Democrats close to a majority, but like Ossoff, they could end up falling short by only being part of the Trump opposition.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.