SMART IDEAS: When Computers Sentence Criminals

The first regular-season game in Atlanta's SunTrust Park was played on Friday.
AP Photo/David Goldman
Add to Briefcase
April 18, 2017, 8 p.m.

Don't fall for the siren call of publicly funded stadiums

A. Bar­ton Hinkle, writ­ing for the Rich­mond Times-Dis­patch

The At­lanta Braves haven’t done much win­ning on the field of late. But they con­tin­ue to tri­umph in one area: ex­tract­ing money from tax­pay­ers. From their new ma­jor-league sta­di­um in Cobb County, Geor­gia, to three minor-league parks, they’ve stuck the loc­al jur­is­dic­tion with the bill every time. The same scen­ario is play­ing out in De­troit and Hart­ford, Con­necti­c­ut. “The money might buy the loc­als some ho­met­own pride. But it doesn’t buy them much of any­thing else: More than two dec­ades of aca­dem­ic re­search on the sub­ject find that sta­di­ums pro­duce al­most no eco­nom­ic be­ne­fit.” Eco­nom­ists are nearly un­an­im­ous on this point. “And re­mem­ber: Eco­nom­ists are al­most nev­er un­an­im­ous about any­thing.”

A.I. has no place in criminal justice ... at least not yet

Jason Tashea, writ­ing for Wired

As in many parts of mod­ern life, the use of al­gorithms is now per­vas­ive when it comes to sen­ten­cing crim­in­als. “Cur­rently, courts and cor­rec­tions de­part­ments around the US use al­gorithms to de­term­ine a de­fend­ant’s ‘risk’, which ranges from the prob­ab­il­ity that an in­di­vidu­al will com­mit an­oth­er crime to the like­li­hood a de­fend­ant will ap­pear for his or her court date. These al­gorithmic out­puts in­form de­cisions about bail, sen­ten­cing, and pa­role.” These al­gorithms are typ­ic­ally pur­chases from third-party vendors, which are of­ten “pro­pri­et­ary or ‘black boxed,’ mean­ing only the own­ers, and to a lim­ited de­gree the pur­chaser, can see how the soft­ware makes de­cisions.” As ar­ti­fi­cial in­tel­li­gence grows more ad­vanced, so too will its opa­city. Poli­cy­makers should “hit pause and cre­ate a pre­vent­at­ive morator­i­um” on AI’s use in crim­in­al justice, un­til we can de­term­ine how AI’s “risk as­sess­ments should be ex­amined dur­ing tri­al” and what kind of over­sight mech­an­isms can be put in­to place.

No good options when it comes to North Korea

Ian Bur­uma, writ­ing for The At­lantic

Pres­id­ent Trump may have to ac­cept that the North Korean conun­drum can­not be “solved” in any tra­di­tion­al sense of the word. “The fact is that there is noth­ing much Amer­ica can do about [Kim Jong-Un’s] at­tempts to de­vel­op nuc­le­ar-tipped mis­siles, es­pe­cially without China’s sup­port.” First off, Kim will not sur­render his nukes at any price; they’re the only thing keep­ing his coun­try from be­ing viewed as the “small, im­pov­er­ished dic­tat­or­ship” that it is. Any dip­lo­mat­ic solu­tion must in­clude China, “but the last thing Beijing wants is for its com­mun­ist neigh­bor to col­lapse. The Kim re­gime may be an­noy­ing, but a united Korea filled with U.S. mil­it­ary bases would be worse, not to men­tion the po­ten­tial refugee crisis on China’s bor­ders.” There’s cer­tainly no one to play the role that Mikhail Gorbachev did dur­ing Ger­man re­uni­fic­a­tion, pre­vent­ing blood­shed as the two halves of a coun­try re­unite. For now, the world will have to live with a nuc­le­ar North Korea.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.