OFF TO THE RACES

Trump’s Policies Are a Result of On-the-Job Training

As the president’s knowledge increases, his positions are drifting toward the mainstream.

President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping reach to shake hands at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla., on April 7.
AP Photo/Alex Brandon
Charlie Cook
Add to Briefcase
Charlie Cook
April 17, 2017, 8 p.m.

The me­dia and crit­ics on the Left are hav­ing a field day at­tack­ing Pres­id­ent Trump’s rather nu­mer­ous and of­ten dra­mat­ic changes of heart on policy—wheth­er China ma­nip­u­lates its cur­rency, the ne­ces­sity of the U.S. Ex­port-Im­port Bank and NATO, and the U.S.’s stra­tegic pos­ture in Syr­ia. And then there is the ques­tion of wheth­er health care re­form is really easy or really hard.

The New York Times on Sunday ran an in­ter­est­ing graph­ic of Trump’s past and cur­rent state­ments on vari­ous is­sues. On NATO, the evol­u­tion star­ted on March 23, 2016, when he told Bloomberg Polit­ics, “I think NATO may be ob­sol­ete.” He re­it­er­ated the claim on April 4, 2016 to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, again on ABC’s This Week on Ju­ly 31, and to The Times of Lon­don on Jan. 16 of this year. But at a news con­fer­ence last week, he took a very dif­fer­ent tack. “I said it was ob­sol­ete,” he said. “It’s no longer ob­sol­ete.”

Trump re­peated the same pat­tern on China’s cur­rency. “They’re de­valu­ing their cur­rency to a level that you wouldn’t be­lieve,” he said in his cam­paign an­nounce­ment speech on June 16, 2015. “It’s im­possible for our com­pan­ies to com­pete.” In a cam­paign speech on Aug. 24, 2016, he said, “I am go­ing to in­struct my Treas­ury sec­ret­ary to la­bel China a cur­rency ma­nip­u­lat­or, the greatest in the world.” Less than a month ago, he pro­claimed, “When you talk about cur­rency ma­nip­u­la­tion, when you talk about de­valu­ations, they are world cham­pi­ons.” But 10 days later, on April 12, he told The Wall Street Journ­al, “They’re not cur­rency ma­nip­u­lat­ors.” But maybe things are more com­plic­ated. This past week­end, he tweeted: “Why would I call China a cur­rency ma­nip­u­lat­or when they are work­ing with us on the North Korean prob­lem?”

On the Ex­port-Im­port Bank, he was against it be­fore he was for it, telling Bloomberg Polit­ics last Au­gust: “I don’t like it. I think it’s a lot of ex­cess bag­gage. I think it is un­ne­ces­sary.” But by April 12 of this year, he pro­claimed to The Wall Street Journ­al that the bank is “a very good thing. And it ac­tu­ally makes money; it could make a lot of money.”

Crit­ic­al of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s policies on Syr­ia, on May 29, 2013, Trump tweeted, “Syr­ia is NOT our prob­lem.” An­oth­er tweet on Sept. 5, 2013: “Do NOT at­tack Syr­ia, fix U.S.A.” On Oct. 26, 2016, he told Re­u­ters: “What we should do is fo­cus on IS­IS. We should not be fo­cus­ing on Syr­ia.” But earli­er this month, after Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad’s mil­it­ary’s used sar­in gas on its own ci­vil­ians, Trump said, “To­night I ordered a tar­geted mil­it­ary strike on the air­field in Syr­ia from where the chem­ic­al at­tack was launched. … I call on all civ­il­ized na­tions to join us in seek­ing to end the slaughter and blood­shed in Syr­ia.”

After months of say­ing that the U.S. should pres­sure the Chinese to get North Korea in line, he then met with Pres­id­ent Xi Jin­ping and heard the Chinese per­spect­ive. “After listen­ing for 10 minutes, I real­ized it’s not so easy,” said Trump. “It’s not what you think.”

Then there was his edu­ca­tion on health care. At an Oc­to­ber cam­paign rally in Flor­ida, can­did­ate Trump said, “To­geth­er we’re go­ing to de­liv­er real change that once again puts Amer­ic­ans first. That be­gins with im­me­di­ately re­peal­ing and re­pla­cing the dis­aster known as Obama­care. … You’re go­ing to have such great health care, at a tiny frac­tion of the cost—and it’s go­ing to be so easy.”

But by Feb. 27, Pres­id­ent Trump was telling the na­tion’s gov­ernors, “Now, I have to tell you, it’s an un­be­liev­ably com­plex sub­ject. Nobody knew health care could be so com­plic­ated.”

But think about where Don­ald Trump was com­ing from. This is not a guy who ever spent days at­tend­ing sym­po­sia or read­ing white pa­pers from the Amer­ic­an En­ter­prise In­sti­tute, the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion, the Coun­cil on For­eign Re­la­tions, or, for that mat­ter, the con­ser­vat­ive Her­it­age Found­a­tion or the liber­tari­an Cato In­sti­tute. This is not someone who over the years spent hours per­us­ing For­eign Af­fairs magazine or The Eco­nom­ist. Even The Wall Street Journ­al and The New York Times ap­pear to have got­ten curs­ory reads at best.

Pri­or to his elec­tion, it would seem Trump’s main source of in­form­a­tion was tele­vi­sion, spe­cific­ally cable news. While there are some very tal­en­ted journ­al­ists who have shows on cable, too many cable news shows have heavy ideo­lo­gic­al lean­ings to the right or left and serve only to en­ter­tain and to per­suade. You will rarely hear any of these hosts use the phrase “on the oth­er hand” to make a point that doesn’t sup­port their gen­er­al world­view.

Every 30 days or so since his elec­tion, Trump has more or less doubled or tripled his know­ledge and un­der­stand­ing of pub­lic policy, eco­nom­ics, and the way the world works. This policy stuff is a lot more com­plic­ated than it looked sit­ting on a Bar­caloun­ger with a TV re­mote in hand. In base­ball, it’s long been said that things look a lot easi­er from the cheap seats in the up­per deck. Be­ing the man­ager is hard. So is deal­ing with pub­lic policy.

Not on every is­sue, but on many, we are gradu­ally see­ing Pres­id­ent Trump re­vert to the mean, mov­ing from wild and simplist­ic po­s­i­tions to ones that fit with­in the con­fines of main­stream Amer­ic­an polit­ics. Amer­ic­ans voted for an out­sider, someone who would ap­proach the pres­id­ency with new eyes. On many is­sues, those eyes are grow­ing more in­formed, as policies gradu­ally move more to­ward the norm. But that’s what hap­pens.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF IS PUSHING BACK
Trump Wants Scaramucci to Helm WH Communications
11 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump is expected to announce that Wall Street financier Anthony Scaramucci will be White House communications director, according to two sources familiar with the planning. Trump has left the role open since Mike Dubke resigned in May, and the President has vented frequently to his friends about the performance of his press operation." According to NBC News, Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus are resisting the move.

Source:
NEW GALLUP POLL
Trump’s Approval Rating a Record Low at 6-Month Point
30 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump's second-quarter job approval rating has fallen below what any other past president has gotten during the same time frame. A new Gallup poll found that Trump averaged a 38.8% rating between April 20 and July 19. The average approval rating for that time is 62%. President Obama was at the average during this time period, as was President Nixon. President Clinton is the only president who was below 50% by the second quarter, coming in with a 44% approval rating." There is also a large partisan gap. "Just 8% of Democrats approved of Trump's job performance during the second quarter, but 85% of Republicans did. Approval ratings have become increasingly polarized in recent administrations, but the 77-point gap for Trump is a new record."

Source:
ANNOUNCEMENT IMMINENT
Government to Bar Americans from Visiting N. Korea
31 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"The US government will soon prohibit American citizens from traveling to North Korea, according to two tour groups that cater to Western tourists who want to visit the secretive country. The US will announce the ban within a couple of days, said Simon Cockerell, general manager of Beijing-based Koryo Tours. The agency was informed of the development by officials of the Swedish government, which represents America's interests in North Korea, he told CNN."

Source:
NEA AND NEH GET $145 MIL EACH
House Appropriations Ignore Trump’s Proposed Arts Cuts
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Federal arts and humanities programs targeted for elimination by the Trump administration would get a lifeline from House appropriators willing to ignore the president’s proposal and keep them running. The $31.5 billion fiscal 2018 Interior-Environment spending bill approved by the House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday includes $145 million for the National Endowment for the Arts. While that’s still a 3.2 percent cut from the fiscal year 2017 enacted level, it is more than $116 million above Trump’s budget request. The National Endowment for the Humanities would receive $145 million in fiscal 2018, which is $103.7 million above the White House budget request."

Source:
469 WITHDRAWN, 391 BEING REEVALUATED
Trump Nixes Hundreds of Obama Regs
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The White House’s Office of Management and Budget detailed Thursday how it would jettison hundreds of existing or planned regulations as part of its larger push to ease federal restrictions on the private sector, upending federal policies on labor, the environment and public health. ... The Trump administration said it was pulling or suspending 860 pending regulations."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login