Republicans are nervously anticipating Tuesday’s congressional election in Georgia, furiously trying to prevent Democrat Jon Ossoff from winning a majority of the vote in a suburban Atlanta district that hasn’t elected a Democrat since Jimmy Carter’s presidency. The late flurry of spending from outside GOP groups has stunted Ossoff’s momentum, but the unpredictability of turnout in an off-year race and the possibility for some Republicans to defect are keeping party officials up at night.
The encouraging news for the GOP: A flurry of registered Republicans have showed up to cast early ballots in the past several days, closing the partisan gap that emerged early on. The New York Times’ Nate Cohn reported that, as of Thursday night, there’s a fairly even partisan split among early votes: Registered Democrats have cast 42 percent of preelection ballots and registered Republicans have cast 41 percent. Republicans are still seriously underperforming in the early vote, but not at a low-enough level to give Ossoff an outright victory.
The bad news for the GOP: Under normal circumstances, Ossoff shouldn’t be coming close to winning a majority of the vote in a conservative-friendly district like this. Democrats have effectively nationalized this race, using the low-key Ossoff as a symbol of Democratic resistance in the Trump era. Between Trump’s low approval ratings, an angry Democratic base, and an apathetic Republican electorate trying to figure out what the party stands for, an anti-Trump wave is building across the country. Republicans are also handicapped in this election because they have several credible candidates running on a crowded all-party ballot (led by former Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handel, businessman Bob Gray, and former state senator Dan Moody), while Ossoff has unified the Democratic Party behind his candidacy.
While many analysts are focused on the level of turnout among partisans, it’s equally important to watch how many typical Republican voters defect from the party line. Despite raising record sums from liberal groups, Ossoff has shrewdly positioned himself as tough on national security and fiscally prudent in his campaign advertisements—a message specifically designed to woo moderate Republicans and independents. It’s easy to forget that a large chunk of reliably Republican voters cast ballots for Hillary Clinton just last November, nearly giving her a victory in this traditionally GOP seat. Compared to Clinton, Ossoff isn’t nearly as polarizing and is running on a more moderate message. If he can peel off a small slice of Republicans, it would be the final twist to a race that has surprised strategists on both sides.
Regardless of what happens Tuesday, the political environment for Republicans is toxic. Democrats are finding a flurry of credible Congressional candidates willing to run in tough districts, while Republicans are facing tougher-than-expected recruiting efforts in some of the most Trump-friendly territory. The competitiveness of the Georgia contest (a district with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R+8) has underscored that Democrats have a fighting shot to win the House. The conventional wisdom has rapidly shifted from gerrymandering locking in permanent GOP congressional control to a supercharged Democratic base putting even conservative districts in play under the right circumstances.
The results from Georgia will offer important clues about how aggressively Democrats can expand the House map. If Ossoff wins outright Tuesday (after a closer-than-expected Kansas race), it will spark panic with the GOP majority. Ossoff also has a credible chance to win a June runoff, if he falls a little short of 50 percent in the first round. That shouldn’t offer any false hope to Republicans, either.
The GOP’s best hope? Betting that raising the specter of Nancy Pelosi-style liberalism will be enough to rally the GOP base and protect endangered suburban districts like this one. If their playbook in Georgia works, they’ll face a tough but salvageable environment in 2018.
What We're Following See More »
"President Trump is expected to announce that Wall Street financier Anthony Scaramucci will be White House communications director, according to two sources familiar with the planning. Trump has left the role open since Mike Dubke resigned in May, and the President has vented frequently to his friends about the performance of his press operation." According to NBC News, Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus are resisting the move.
"President Donald Trump's second-quarter job approval rating has fallen below what any other past president has gotten during the same time frame. A new Gallup poll found that Trump averaged a 38.8% rating between April 20 and July 19. The average approval rating for that time is 62%. President Obama was at the average during this time period, as was President Nixon. President Clinton is the only president who was below 50% by the second quarter, coming in with a 44% approval rating." There is also a large partisan gap. "Just 8% of Democrats approved of Trump's job performance during the second quarter, but 85% of Republicans did. Approval ratings have become increasingly polarized in recent administrations, but the 77-point gap for Trump is a new record."
"The US government will soon prohibit American citizens from traveling to North Korea, according to two tour groups that cater to Western tourists who want to visit the secretive country. The US will announce the ban within a couple of days, said Simon Cockerell, general manager of Beijing-based Koryo Tours. The agency was informed of the development by officials of the Swedish government, which represents America's interests in North Korea, he told CNN."
"Federal arts and humanities programs targeted for elimination by the Trump administration would get a lifeline from House appropriators willing to ignore the president’s proposal and keep them running. The $31.5 billion fiscal 2018 Interior-Environment spending bill approved by the House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday includes $145 million for the National Endowment for the Arts. While that’s still a 3.2 percent cut from the fiscal year 2017 enacted level, it is more than $116 million above Trump’s budget request. The National Endowment for the Humanities would receive $145 million in fiscal 2018, which is $103.7 million above the White House budget request."
"The White House’s Office of Management and Budget detailed Thursday how it would jettison hundreds of existing or planned regulations as part of its larger push to ease federal restrictions on the private sector, upending federal policies on labor, the environment and public health. ... The Trump administration said it was pulling or suspending 860 pending regulations."