AGAINST THE GRAIN

Dems Flex Muscles in Red States

Senate Republicans have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to cement a long-term majority. But Trump’s baggage is weighing them down.

Sen. Claire McCaskill
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
April 4, 2017, 8 p.m.

Something sur­pris­ing happened on the way to the midterms: Red-state Demo­crats are act­ing a lot more con­fid­ently than any­one ex­pec­ted. All 10 Sen­ate Demo­crats up for reelec­tion in states won by Don­ald Trump voted against the Re­pub­lic­an health care over­haul, pre­vent­ing the White House from get­ting even a small de­gree of bi­par­tis­an buy-in. None of them sup­por­ted the con­firm­a­tion of Health and Hu­man Ser­vices Sec­ret­ary Tom Price and Edu­ca­tion Sec­ret­ary Betsy De­Vos—and only Sen. Joe Manchin of West Vir­gin­ia backed At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Jeff Ses­sions. Sev­en of the 10 are fili­bus­ter­ing Su­preme Court nom­in­ee Neil Gor­such, even though his fa­vor­ab­il­ity rat­ings are sky-high after his strong con­firm­a­tion hear­ing.

This wasn’t sup­posed to hap­pen. Five of the red-state Demo­crats rep­res­ent states that Trump car­ried by double di­gits. Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill of Mis­souri, one of the most en­dangered sen­at­ors on next year’s bal­lot, is vot­ing and talk­ing like a down-the-line lib­er­al, rarely break­ing with her party. She rep­res­ents a state that Trump car­ried by 19 points. Sen. Jon Test­er of Montana, up for reelec­tion in a state Trump car­ried by 20 points, joined Mc­Caskill in sup­port­ing the Gor­such fili­buster. Even Manchin, rep­res­ent­ing the most pro-Trump state in the coun­try, has felt em­boldened to break with the ad­min­is­tra­tion when he feels that its po­s­i­tions are more closely aligned with Wall Street than Main Street.

In a more con­ven­tion­al polit­ic­al en­vir­on­ment, tak­ing par­tis­an votes against the will of con­stitu­ents would be quite risky. But as Trump con­tin­ues to struggle, these sen­at­ors be­lieve that Trump’s elect­or­al per­form­ance in their home states was more a re­jec­tion of Clin­to­nian elit­ism than an em­brace of his polit­ic­al agenda. Many don’t ex­pect re­tri­bu­tion for de­fy­ing the pres­id­ent on his core ini­ti­at­ives—wheth­er it’s his Su­preme Court pick, his im­mig­ra­tion ban, or his plan to re­peal Obama­care. In fact, they’re tak­ing a page out of the House Free­dom Caucus play­book, cast­ing Trump as a cap­tive of the Wall Street swamp that he cam­paigned against.

To be sure, most of these Demo­crats don’t have a lot of reas­on to be run­ning scared, re­gard­less of Trump. Three of them are up in the tra­di­tion­ally blue Rust Belt states that Trump flipped; none of them has yet drawn a ser­i­ous chal­lenger. Two top GOP pro­spects—Reps. Pat Mee­han of Pennsylvania and Sean Duffy of Wis­con­sin—de­cided early on not to run. In Montana, Re­pub­lic­ans have a sur­pris­ingly thin bench of can­did­ates to take on Test­er, one reas­on why he’s ag­gress­ively chal­lenged the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion. Re­pub­lic­an of­fi­cials privately ac­know­ledge that Manchin and Sen. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, who boast sol­id per­son­al brands, will be dif­fi­cult to beat. “I see states out­side the top five [Trump states] that will prob­ably be bet­ter op­por­tun­it­ies than West Vir­gin­ia and North Dakota,” said one GOP op­er­at­ive.

At this early stage, the most prom­ising pickup op­por­tun­ity for Re­pub­lic­ans is in Mis­souri, where Mc­Caskill’s sur­rog­acy for Hil­lary Clin­ton in last year’s cam­paign makes her uniquely vul­ner­able. Weigh­ing a chal­lenge is one of the GOP’s strongest po­ten­tial re­cruits, Rep. Ann Wag­n­er. Sen. Joe Don­nelly of In­di­ana is also draw­ing cred­ible early op­pos­i­tion after de­feat­ing a weak Re­pub­lic­an in his first Sen­ate race. But out­side of Mis­souri and In­di­ana, the GOP is hav­ing a tough time en­list­ing vi­able can­did­ates.

So far, Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Chuck Schu­mer has ac­cur­ately pin­pointed the one ar­gu­ment uni­fy­ing his ideo­lo­gic­ally di­verse caucus: fight­ing for work­ing-class in­terests. Sev­er­al of the en­dangered red-state Demo­crats have built pop­u­list brands that will al­low them to com­pete for Trump voters. They’ve had no prob­lem op­pos­ing GOP policies that cater to more-af­flu­ent voters, not­ably the health care over­haul, school choice, and cor­por­ate tax re­form. Even the battle over the Su­preme Court isn’t likely to be a ma­jor factor in next year’s midterms. Gor­such is a broadly pop­u­lar nom­in­ee, but will voters care about a Demo­crat­ic fili­buster 18 months from now?

It’s easy to ima­gine a dif­fer­ent scen­ario if Trump had trans­lated mo­mentum from his elec­tion in­to policies de­signed to di­vide the Demo­crats. By fo­cus­ing first on in­fra­struc­ture, for ex­ample, he would have picked an is­sue with strong ap­peal to the blue-col­lar voters who swung his way in the elec­tion. That, in turn, would have put pres­sure on red-state Demo­crats to split with their lead­ers on hot-but­ton is­sues. In­stead, Re­pub­lic­ans seem hope­lessly di­vided while the most vul­ner­able Demo­crats are act­ing bul­let­proof.

The good news for Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans is that they’re all but guar­an­teed to main­tain their ma­jor­ity, even in a worst-case scen­ario. The map is simply that fa­vor­able: Only nine GOP sen­at­ors are up for reelec­tion, sev­en in deeply con­ser­vat­ive states, while 25 Demo­crat­ic seats are in play. But if the polit­ic­al en­vir­on­ment con­tin­ues to be rough for Re­pub­lic­ans, they could struggle to pick up seats. And if Demo­crats are able to win in Re­pub­lic­an states in 2018, the math turns sharply in their fa­vor in 2020.

What We're Following See More »
SHE IS AMBASSADOR TO CANADA AND A GOP DONOR
Kelly Craft Nominated for UN Post
4 hours ago
THE LATEST
CRITICS CALL RULE "AN INDIRECT WAY TO DEFUND PLANNED PARENTHOOD"
Trump Blocks Federal Funding to Groups that Make Abortion Referrals
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration took aim at Planned Parenthood Friday, issuing a rule barring groups that provide abortions or abortion referrals from participating in the $286 million federal family planning program — a move that is expected to direct millions toward faith-based providers."

Source:
SENATE MUST THEN VOTE ON MEASURE WITHIN 18 DAYS
House Expects Tuesday Vote to End National Emergency
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House plans to vote Tuesday on legislation to formally block President Donald Trump’s attempt to circumvent Congress to fund his border wall, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Friday. The privileged resolution to stop Trump’s emergency declaration — which has 226 co-sponsors, including one Republican — is expected to easily pass the House. It then will be voted in the Senate within 18 days."

Source:
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login