“Don’t wait until it’s too late.” That’s the motto of preventive medicine that, for one-third of Americans, is not an option.
In the last year, 30 percent of American adults say that they or a family member put off medical treatment because of the cost, according to a Gallup Poll out Monday. Nearly 60 percent of uninsured people delayed getting checked out, more than double the amount of people with private health insurance (25 percent) and those with Medicare or Medicaid (22 percent).
Such procrastination is not new. Similar numbers of Americans have been putting off calling the doctor to avoid expensive treatment or out-of-pocket costs since 2005. But the continuing trend has serious implications.
In the last decade, polls have shown that Americans are more likely to delay seeking medical treatment for a serious condition than for one that’s not, and they’ve done so more each year. Treating diabetes costs more than treating a nasty scrape or bruise.
But scrapes and bruises are not long-term threats to Americans’ health and the country’s health care system. When medical issues go untreated, they can get worse, costing both patients and the entire industry much more when people finally seek medical attention. A concern that could have been addressed by a primary-care physician graduates to a worse problem treated by a usually more expensive specialist. Eventually, it can become a lifelong condition costing thousands a year in prescriptions and premiums.
For Americans, however, the threat of chronic illness is no longer the biggest problem in health care. Cost replaced access as the top concern last month, then followed by obesity and cancer.
Delaying treatment for fear of high costs could, if the Affordable Care Act works as intended, be remedied for some Americans. Then again, a surge in Americans seeking medical treatment could strain the health care system, leading to longer wait times for appointments and less face time with doctors.
In this poll, Gallup surveyed by telephone 1,039 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, between Nov. 7 and Nov. 10. The margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points.
What We're Following See More »
Congress will need to vote on Donald Trump's pick of Lt. General H.R. McMaster to be his next national security adviser, but not for the reason you think. The position of NSA doesn't require Senate approval, but since McMaster currently holds a three-star military position, Congress will need to vote to allow him to keep his position instead of forcing him to drop one star and become a Major General, which could potentially affect his pension.
"The Senate Intelligence Committee is seeking to ensure that records related to Russia’s alleged intervention in the 2016 U.S. elections are preserved as it begins investigating that country’s ties to the Trump team. The panel sent more than a dozen letters to 'organizations, agencies and officials' on Friday, asking them to preserve materials related to the congressional investigation, according to a Senate aide, who was not authorized to comment publicly. The Senate Intelligence Committee is spearheading the most comprehensive probe on Capitol Hill of Russia’s alleged activities in the elections."
Retired Russian diplomats and members of Vladimir Putin's staff are compiling a dossier "on Donald Trump's psychological makeup" for the Russian leader. "Among its preliminary conclusions is that the new American leader is a risk-taker who can be naïve, according to a senior Kremlin adviser."