GOP Senators Cry Foul Over Medicaid-Expansion Repeal

House Republicans unveiled their Obamacare repeal-replace legislation, just after four Republican senators expressed concern about plans to repeal Medicaid expansion.

Sen. Rob Portman
AP Photo/Alex Brandon
Erin Durkin and Alex Rogers
Add to Briefcase
Erin Durkin and Alex Rogers
March 6, 2017, 8:53 p.m.

The House Re­pub­lic­an plan to phase out the Obama­care Medi­caid ex­pan­sion by 2020 may be a non­starter for some Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans—and could po­ten­tially threaten the lar­ger re­peal-and-re­place pro­cess.

Shortly be­fore House law­makers re­vealed a re­vamped ver­sion of their Obama­care re­peal-and-re­place bill Monday even­ing, four Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors sent a let­ter to Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell say­ing they would not sup­port an earli­er draft from Feb. 10 that re­peals Medi­caid ex­pan­sion be­cause it “does not meet the test of sta­bil­ity for in­di­vidu­als cur­rently en­rolled in the pro­gram.”

The Medi­caid re­forms are part of a re­con­cili­ation pack­age that would re­peal the Af­ford­able Care Act taxes and man­dates. It re­quires only a simple ma­jor­ity to pass the Sen­ate, but Re­pub­lic­ans hold only a 52-seat ma­jor­ity, so any three Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors can kill the bill. The Medi­caid ex­pan­sion has provided cov­er­age to more than 10 mil­lion people in 31 states, about half of which are run by Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors.

Sen. Rob Port­man of Ohio, who signed the let­ter, took par­tic­u­lar is­sue with pro­vi­sions that would not al­low new be­ne­fi­ciar­ies to come in at the high­er match rate between now and 2020.

“Our big con­cern is that between now and 2020 … that you’re go­ing to have a real gap,” Port­man said Monday, shortly be­fore the House un­veiled its le­gis­la­tion. “And so, dur­ing this trans­ition peri­od, we were con­cerned about that House ap­proach.”

The new lan­guage re­peals the en­hanced match rate for newly eli­gible be­ne­fi­ciar­ies on Dec. 31, 2019. Ac­cord­ing to a House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee sum­mary, states can keep the en­hanced match for newly eli­gible ex­pendit­ures that oc­cur be­fore Jan. 1, 2020. But the lan­guage also amends the for­mula for ex­pan­sion-state match­ing so that the match­ing rate stops phas­ing up after 2017 and the trans­ition per­cent­age would re­main at the 2017 level for each sub­sequent year.

A spokes­per­son for Port­man’s of­fice said after the new lan­guage was re­leased that the sen­at­or would re­view the text and con­sult with ex­pan­sion-state gov­ernors and policy ex­perts in Ohio be­fore mak­ing de­cisions.

The new bill also re­tains the plan to re­form Medi­caid in­to a per cap­ita cap struc­ture. Fisc­al year 2016 would be used as the base year to set tar­geted spend­ing for each en­rollee cat­egory.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who also signed the let­ter, told re­port­ers on Monday that she was try­ing to fig­ure out a way for­ward that treats people in a “fair and hu­mane man­ner.” She told her state’s le­gis­lature last month that she would not vote to re­peal the ex­pan­sion as long as they wanted to keep it.

“I’ve got a situ­ation where in Alaska we’ve got 27,000 people that are now eli­gible for cov­er­age that didn’t have it be­fore—that really have no place else to turn,” she said.

Port­man also said that many of the Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors have told him and oth­er sen­at­ors that they’re in­ter­ested in trans­ition­ing Medi­caid to a per cap­ita cap so long as there is “real flex­ib­il­ity.”

En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee Chair­man Greg Walden told Fox News Chan­nel’s Spe­cial Re­port that law­makers want to re­store power to the states and put Medi­caid on a budget.

Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said the sen­at­ors’ con­cerns were be­ing heard and that a “good middle ground” could be struck between ex­pan­sion states and non-ex­pan­sion states.

The House le­gis­la­tion re­quires states with Medi­caid-ex­pan­sion pop­u­la­tions to re­de­ter­mine ex­pan­sion en­rollees’ eli­gib­il­ity every six months. It also provides $10 bil­lion in safety-net fund­ing for non-ex­pan­sion states over five years start­ing in 2018.

What We're Following See More »
TALKED ABOUT STRENGTHENING RUSSO-U.S. RELATIONS
Vekselberg Met with Cohen Days Before the Election
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Eleven days before the presidential inauguration last year, a billionaire Russian businessman with ties to the Kremlin visited Trump Tower in Manhattan to meet with Donald J. Trump’s personal lawyer and fixer, Michael D. Cohen, according to video footage and another person who attended the meeting. In Mr. Cohen’s office on the 26th floor, he and the oligarch, Viktor Vekselberg, discussed a mutual desire to strengthen Russia’s relations with the United States under President Trump, according to Andrew Intrater, an American businessman who attended the meeting and invests money for Mr. Vekselberg."

Source:
HAS DELAYED WHILE INVESTIGATION CONTINUES
Mueller Tells Court He’s Ready for Papadopoulos Sentencing
4 days ago
THE LATEST
COPS A PLEA
Cohen Business Partner to Cooperate with Investigators
5 days ago
THE LATEST
R/E HIS DEMAND
Trump Meeting with Wray and Rosenstein
6 days ago
THE LATEST
TRUMP DEMANDED IT IN TWEET
DOJ Asks Watchdog to Look into Any Infiltration of Trump Campaign
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"The Justice Department asked its internal watchdog to examine if there was any impropriety in the counterintelligence investigation of President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, after the president demanded Sunday that the department investigate the motives behind the inquiry. Earlier Sunday, in one of a series of tweets targeting the probe into whether Trump associates colluded with Russia during the 2016 campaign, Mr. Trump wrote: 'I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes - and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!'"

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login