AGAINST THE GRAIN

The Democrats’ White-Guy Problem

Party leaders are discovering that it’s hard to excite their base if their candidates don’t pass a diversity test.

Thomas Perez
AP Foto/Branden Camp
Josh Kraushaar
Add to Briefcase
Josh Kraushaar
Feb. 28, 2017, 8:01 p.m.

The battle for the chair­man­ship of the Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee was far from the most con­sequen­tial de­cision that party lead­ers were fa­cing. But it offered an in­struct­ive les­son over how iden­tity polit­ics—put­ting one’s skin col­or or gender over polit­ic­al views and the qual­ity of one’s résumé—has be­come the de­fin­ing prin­ciple for today’s Demo­crat­ic Party act­iv­ists. With a pro­gress­ive grass­roots ob­sessed with check­ing priv­ilege, it’s dif­fi­cult for even the most ap­peal­ing white male can­did­ate to over­come this polit­ic­al han­di­cap with the base.

Former Labor Sec­ret­ary Thomas Perez’s nar­row win over Bernie Sanders-backed Rep. Keith El­lis­on was a vic­tory for es­tab­lish­ment forces with­in the party. But the big­ger, less-ap­pre­ci­ated story was the im­plo­sion of 35-year-old South Bend May­or Pete But­ti­gieg, con­sidered a rising star in the party and a ser­i­ous con­tender for the chair­man­ship. With sup­port from well-placed party lead­ers (like former DNC chair Howard Dean, former Mary­land Gov. Mar­tin O’Mal­ley, Dav­id Axel­rod, and Obama com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or Jen Psaki), But­ti­gieg looked like a plaus­ible com­prom­ise can­did­ate who could unite the party’s pro­gress­ive and prag­mat­ic fac­tions. In­stead, he dropped out of the race be­fore the first round of bal­lot­ing, re­cog­niz­ing his low vote total would be an em­bar­rass­ment.

On pa­per, But­ti­gieg offered everything the party needed for a pub­lic face—a young, cha­ris­mat­ic small-town may­or from the Mid­w­est who is out­spokenly lib­er­al and openly gay. But be­ing a white guy in today’s Demo­crat­ic Party has be­come a glar­ing polit­ic­al vul­ner­ab­il­ity.

Re­pub­lic­ans have well-pub­li­cized dif­fi­culties with iden­tity polit­ics. They fare poorly with Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans and Lati­nos, and need to make in­roads with these groups if they’re go­ing to be vi­able as the coun­try be­comes more di­verse.

But But­ti­gieg’s un­der­whelm­ing per­form­ance is part of a pat­tern in which Demo­crat­ic lead­ers face their own chal­lenge—how to ex­cite Obama’s co­ali­tion of mil­len­ni­als and non­white voters without play­ing iden­tity polit­ics. Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ives are now throw­ing Clin­ton run­ning mate Tim Kaine un­der the bus, lament­ing that he didn’t en­er­gize the party’s all-too-com­pla­cent base in last year’s elec­tion. On col­lege cam­puses across the coun­try, left-wing stu­dents are agit­at­ing to ex­cise the names of white male his­tor­ic­al fig­ures from cam­pus build­ings.

There are ex­cep­tions to the dy­nam­ic. Bernie Sanders was able to ex­cite white mil­len­ni­als in the primary cam­paign, but he didn’t gen­er­ate much en­thu­si­asm among Afric­an-Amer­ic­an Demo­crats. Sen. Al Franken’s celebrity could put him in a unique po­s­i­tion, if he chose to run for pres­id­ent. But these out­liers prove the point.

Kaine is a text­book ex­ample of an ac­com­plished lib­er­al swing-state sen­at­or whose prag­mat­ism and de­cency ut­terly failed to ex­cite core Demo­crat­ic voters in last year’s pres­id­en­tial elec­tion. Even with an im­press­ive civil-rights re­cord and flu­ency in Span­ish, he didn’t help Clin­ton at­tract the party’s base of young, non­white voters to the polls. One top Clin­ton ad­viser, who re­ques­ted an­onym­ity to can­didly as­sess the elec­tion, told Na­tion­al Journ­al that pick­ing Kaine as her run­ning mate was a ma­jor blun­der be­cause he didn’t of­fer any­thing to a rest­ive base.

Obama’s Su­preme Court nom­in­ee Mer­rick Gar­land, a re­spec­ted prag­mat­ic jur­ist, also failed to hit the sweet spot with the Demo­crat­ic base. Obama hoped that Re­pub­lic­an ob­struc­tion of his nom­in­a­tion would hand Demo­crats a tail­or-made is­sue for the pres­id­en­tial elec­tion. In­stead, the op­pos­ite happened. The lib­er­al base hardly cared about the fate of a bor­ing white guy, even though the stakes were so high. Demo­crats stopped us­ing Gar­land as a cam­paign is­sue after real­iz­ing his nom­in­a­tion wasn’t res­on­at­ing with their voters. Re­pub­lic­ans, by con­trast, were so en­er­gized by the pro­spect of sav­ing a con­ser­vat­ive ju­di­cial ma­jor­ity that many held their nose and voted for Don­ald Trump des­pite their mis­giv­ings.

This might be a trivi­al is­sue if it wasn’t so con­sequen­tial for the Demo­crat­ic Party’s fu­ture. Just as Re­pub­lic­ans badly need di­versity in the up­per ranks of their party to broaden their ap­peal, Demo­crats must im­prove on their ap­peal with white men. Only 22 per­cent of white men view the Demo­crat­ic party fa­vor­ably, ac­cord­ing to a new NBC News/Wall Street Journ­al poll, with a whop­ping 57 per­cent view­ing it un­fa­vor­ably. Not co­in­cid­ent­ally, just 22 per­cent of Hil­lary Clin­ton’s voters in 2016 were white men, ac­cord­ing to ana­lys­is from my Cook Polit­ic­al Re­port col­league Dav­id Wasser­man.

One of the most alarm­ing trends in polit­ics is the rise of ra­cial po­lar­iz­a­tion. Un­der Trump, Re­pub­lic­ans are now just as eager to mo­bil­ize white men as a core con­stitu­ency to counter the Demo­crats’ in­creased re­li­ance on minor­it­ies.

But each party must pro­mote can­did­ates from out­side its base to break the strangle­hold of iden­tity polit­ics. Re­pub­lic­ans badly need wo­men of col­or in high of­fice to ap­peal to a di­ver­si­fy­ing Amer­ica. But Demo­crats also could use a few good white men to prove that their brand of lib­er­al­ism holds an ap­peal bey­ond the hardened left-wing act­iv­ists.

What We're Following See More »
TALKED ABOUT STRENGTHENING RUSSO-U.S. RELATIONS
Vekselberg Met with Cohen Days Before the Election
22 hours ago
THE LATEST

Eleven days before the presidential inauguration last year, a billionaire Russian businessman with ties to the Kremlin visited Trump Tower in Manhattan to meet with Donald J. Trump’s personal lawyer and fixer, Michael D. Cohen, according to video footage and another person who attended the meeting. In Mr. Cohen’s office on the 26th floor, he and the oligarch, Viktor Vekselberg, discussed a mutual desire to strengthen Russia’s relations with the United States under President Trump, according to Andrew Intrater, an American businessman who attended the meeting and invests money for Mr. Vekselberg."

Source:
HAS DELAYED WHILE INVESTIGATION CONTINUES
Mueller Tells Court He’s Ready for Papadopoulos Sentencing
2 days ago
THE LATEST
COPS A PLEA
Cohen Business Partner to Cooperate with Investigators
3 days ago
THE LATEST
R/E HIS DEMAND
Trump Meeting with Wray and Rosenstein
4 days ago
THE LATEST
TRUMP DEMANDED IT IN TWEET
DOJ Asks Watchdog to Look into Any Infiltration of Trump Campaign
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Justice Department asked its internal watchdog to examine if there was any impropriety in the counterintelligence investigation of President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, after the president demanded Sunday that the department investigate the motives behind the inquiry. Earlier Sunday, in one of a series of tweets targeting the probe into whether Trump associates colluded with Russia during the 2016 campaign, Mr. Trump wrote: 'I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes - and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!'"

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login