Americans Divided Over Iran Deal

United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll finds support splits along party lines, with Democrats backing the accord.

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif shakes hands with Secretary of State John Kerry after a statement on a landmark deal with Iran halting parts of its nuclear program Nov. 24, 2013 in Geneva.
National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
See more stories about...
Shane Goldmacher
Dec. 11, 2013, 3:52 p.m.

The re­cent dip­lo­mat­ic ac­cord with Ir­an is get­ting a split de­cision from the Amer­ic­an pub­lic.

The latest United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll found a nar­row plur­al­ity, 48 per­cent, said they sup­port eas­ing sanc­tions in ex­change for Ir­an halt­ing its nuc­le­ar weapons pro­gram for six months. They em­braced the goal of giv­ing the United States and oth­ers time to craft a per­man­ent nuc­le­ar pact with the rogue na­tion.

At the same time, nearly as many, 45 per­cent, said the United States now should im­pose ad­di­tion­al sanc­tions on Ir­an — even though the White House and oth­ers say such a move would cripple the nas­cent talks.

United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion poll show­ing the dis­con­nect of ideas between Amer­ic­ans and their thoughts on the Ir­an nuc­le­ar agree­ment.Over­all, the poll shows just how little mar­gin for er­ror the White House has with the pub­lic as it un­der­takes one of the biggest and most fraught for­eign policy ven­tures of Pres­id­ent Obama’s term.

The re­sponses split along party lines even though Obama’s name was not in­cluded in the ques­tion, with 62 per­cent of Demo­crats sup­port­ing the six-month Ir­an agree­ment versus only 33 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans. In­de­pend­ents fell in between, with 47 per­cent sup­port.

While race of­ten car­ries out­size in­flu­ence in polit­ic­al polls, it did not here: 49 per­cent of whites said they sup­port the tem­por­ary Ir­an ac­cord and 47 per­cent of non­whites agreed. Not­ably, 47 per­cent of white men who did not gradu­ate from col­lege — a group that has per­sist­ently been the least sup­port­ive of Obama and his policies — sup­por­ted the ac­cord, about the same rate as the rest of the coun­try (48 per­cent).

Sup­port for the agree­ment did rise with in­come, with 54 per­cent of those earn­ing more than $50,000 in sup­port. Only 45 per­cent of those earn­ing less than $50,000 were in fa­vor.

By 1 per­cent­age point, a very nar­row plur­al­ity of those polled, 46 per­cent, said they op­pose lay­er­ing fur­ther eco­nom­ic sanc­tions on Ir­an now. There was a di­vide along gender lines. Men favored im­pos­ing fur­ther sanc­tions by 10 per­cent­age points more than wo­men, 50 to 40 per­cent. Older Amer­ic­ans also pre­ferred slap­ping on more sanc­tions, with 54 per­cent of those above age 50 in fa­vor of new re­stric­tions com­pared with only 38 per­cent of those 49 and young­er.

The split by party was less stark over wheth­er the United States should add more sanc­tions des­pite the ac­cord: 56 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans were in fa­vor versus 45 per­cent of Demo­crats. In­ter­est­ingly, in­de­pend­ents were the least sup­port­ive of such a dip­lo­mat­ic man­euver, with only 41 per­cent in fa­vor.

In­ter­views for the United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll were by con­duc­ted by Prin­ceton Sur­vey Re­search As­so­ci­ates from Dec. 5-8. The sur­vey of 1,002 adults, con­duc­ted via land­line and cell phone, has a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 3.7 per­cent­age points.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×