The recent diplomatic accord with Iran is getting a split decision from the American public.
The latest United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll found a narrow plurality, 48 percent, said they support easing sanctions in exchange for Iran halting its nuclear weapons program for six months. They embraced the goal of giving the United States and others time to craft a permanent nuclear pact with the rogue nation.
At the same time, nearly as many, 45 percent, said the United States now should impose additional sanctions on Iran — even though the White House and others say such a move would cripple the nascent talks.
United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection poll showing the disconnect of ideas between Americans and their thoughts on the Iran nuclear agreement.Overall, the poll shows just how little margin for error the White House has with the public as it undertakes one of the biggest and most fraught foreign policy ventures of President Obama’s term.
The responses split along party lines even though Obama’s name was not included in the question, with 62 percent of Democrats supporting the six-month Iran agreement versus only 33 percent of Republicans. Independents fell in between, with 47 percent support.
While race often carries outsize influence in political polls, it did not here: 49 percent of whites said they support the temporary Iran accord and 47 percent of nonwhites agreed. Notably, 47 percent of white men who did not graduate from college — a group that has persistently been the least supportive of Obama and his policies — supported the accord, about the same rate as the rest of the country (48 percent).
Support for the agreement did rise with income, with 54 percent of those earning more than $50,000 in support. Only 45 percent of those earning less than $50,000 were in favor.
By 1 percentage point, a very narrow plurality of those polled, 46 percent, said they oppose layering further economic sanctions on Iran now. There was a divide along gender lines. Men favored imposing further sanctions by 10 percentage points more than women, 50 to 40 percent. Older Americans also preferred slapping on more sanctions, with 54 percent of those above age 50 in favor of new restrictions compared with only 38 percent of those 49 and younger.
The split by party was less stark over whether the United States should add more sanctions despite the accord: 56 percent of Republicans were in favor versus 45 percent of Democrats. Interestingly, independents were the least supportive of such a diplomatic maneuver, with only 41 percent in favor.
Interviews for the United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll were by conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates from Dec. 5-8. The survey of 1,002 adults, conducted via landline and cell phone, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."