Why Boehner Can Thumb His Nose at the Right

Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) pumps his fist after leaving a meeting of House Republicans at the U.S. Capitol October 16, 2013.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Billy House and Tim Alberta
Dec. 12, 2013, 6:53 a.m.

Tea-party con­ser­vat­ives are call­ing for John Boehner’s head, and some lead­ing Re­pub­lic­an com­ment­at­ors are already writ­ing his polit­ic­al ob­it­u­ary.

Ain’t gonna hap­pen.

Boehner thumbed his nose at the right-wing­ers this week, and there’s pretty much noth­ing they can do about it.

The real­ity is this: Paul Ry­an, not Boehner, will take the brunt of the tea-party and talk-ra­dio rage over the budget deal. And even if some Re­pub­lic­ans in the House wanted to dump Boehner from the speak­er­ship, they couldn’t.

Boehner pushed back against the Right on Wed­nes­day, call­ing op­pos­i­tion to the budget agree­ment from con­ser­vat­ive ad­vocacy groups “ri­dicu­lous.” Those same groups are in­censed over Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee Chair­man Steve Scal­ise’s de­cision to fire the group’s ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or, Paul Tell­er, a pil­lar of Wash­ing­ton’s con­ser­vat­ive com­munity.

But simply put, there’s really noth­ing that con­ser­vat­ives — in­side or out­side of the Cap­it­ol — can do about it. The only House con­ser­vat­ives suf­fi­ciently gal­van­ized by Boehner’s re­marks and Tell­er’s fir­ing to re­volt against the speak­er are largely the same group who tried, and failed, to oust him back in Janu­ary.

Boehner’s open de­fi­ance of con­ser­vat­ive groups seek­ing to un­der­mine the budget deal is not the hall­mark of a speak­er pre­par­ing to sur­render his gavel. Rather, it’s the sign of a lead­er whose grip on his con­fer­ence has nev­er been firmer, and whose power is con­sol­id­ated.

Boehner did not back down on Thursday when asked about his cri­ti­cism of the out­side groups. “They have lost all cred­ib­il­ity,” Boehner said, not­ing that earli­er this week they op­posed the budget deal be­fore it was un­veiled.

Boehner ad­ded, seem­ingly for good meas­ure: “I’m as con­ser­vat­ive as any­body around this place.”

His stew­ard­ship of the House GOP dur­ing Oc­to­ber’s shut­down saga won him new­found re­spect among con­ser­vat­ives, who after the dust settled were quick to squash any talk of re­pla­cing the speak­er.

Rep. Raul Lab­rador, one of 12 House Re­pub­lic­ans to vote against Boehner’s reelec­tion back in Janu­ary, said re­cently that Boehner had fi­nally emerged as “the lead­er we al­ways wanted him to be.” And Rep. Marlin Stutz­man, the early fa­vor­ite to suc­ceed Scal­ise at the RSC, ad­ded, “The speak­er is stronger now with­in our con­fer­ence than he ever has been.”

Now, be­cause Ry­an took the lead craft­ing the budget deal with Sen­ate Demo­crats, Boehner has in­su­lated him­self from dir­ect cri­ti­cism of the ac­cord, even though he is able to push it, act­ively and even pa­ternally.

While some House Re­pub­lic­ans railed against the budget deal Wed­nes­day, not a single one men­tioned Boehner’s name. In­deed, it’s Ry­an — not Boehner — who is bear­ing the brunt of cri­ti­cism from his col­leagues, out­side groups, and con­ser­vat­ive talk ra­dio.

But that hasn’t stopped right-wing pun­dits from pil­ing on Boehner, claim­ing that his re­buke of con­ser­vat­ive groups on Wed­nes­day amoun­ted to a resig­na­tion of his speak­er­ship.

“The speak­er, in his ac­tions, has de­clared he will not seek the speak­er­ship again,” wrote Er­ick Er­ick­son, ed­it­or of Red­State.com.

“John Boehner, when he opened his mouth on Wed­nes­day to de­clare he was no longer in­ter­ested in seek­ing the speak­er­ship, did so by cast­ing his lot with the party, not the move­ment,” he ad­ded.

That’s prob­ably wish­ful think­ing, of course. Boehner’s of­fice last month told Na­tion­al Journ­al that he plans to seek reelec­tion in 2014, and as speak­er in the next Con­gress. And Er­ick­son, like oth­er con­ser­vat­ive crit­ics of Boehner, has a ves­ted in­terest in see­ing Boehner — and Scal­ise — re­placed with more con­ser­vat­ive law­makers who share the tea-party move­ment’s ideo­lo­gic­al agenda.

If Er­ick­son car­ried any sig­ni­fic­ant in­flu­ence over con­ser­vat­ives on Cap­it­ol Hill, Rep. Tom Price would be House speak­er right now, and Rep. Tom Graves would be the RSC chair­man, as he has ad­voc­ated in the past. Alas, they are not.

Graves, a lead­ing House con­ser­vat­ive, says he does not see an anti-Boehner back­lash emer­ging, at least in­tern­ally with­in the GOP con­fer­ence.

“Oh no ““ I don’t sense that what­so­ever,” Graves said Thursday, adding, “I don’t think you could have char­ac­ter­ized this last year, or the pre­vi­ous ses­sion, as ones where there’s been a lov­ing re­la­tion­ship between lead­er­ship and these out­side groups. I don’t sense this as new ter­rit­ory for any­body.”

Of course, there have been shaky times for Boehner, in­clud­ing when he was tar­geted by the ham-fis­ted coup at­tempt early this year. And there have been sev­er­al in­stances this year when Boehner has bucked the ma­jor­ity of his mem­bers after push­ing through le­gis­la­tion without their back­ing, lead­ing to some hard feel­ings.

But he has en­joyed the re­li­able back­ing of a co­ali­tion of Re­pub­lic­ans who, com­bined with large num­bers of House Demo­crats, are cap­able of passing vi­tal le­gis­la­tion. This co­ali­tion in­cludes at least 30 Re­pub­lic­ans who voted to end the shut­down, to reau­thor­ize the Vi­ol­ence Against Wo­men Act, and to grant fund­ing for Hur­ricane Sandy vic­tims.

But there are signs that the new budget agree­ment worked out by Ry­an with Sen. Patty Mur­ray will not have to go that far, be­cause it will likely en­joy the back­ing of a ma­jor­ity of Re­pub­lic­ans.

Still, Boehner is mov­ing to min­im­ize any mis­steps or in­tern­al GOP dis­sen­sion. Two seni­or House Re­pub­lic­an aides say one ex­ample is his de­term­in­a­tion to ad­journ the House for the year on Fri­day.

As one of the aides put it, “The speak­er simply does not think any­thing good can come about for Re­pub­lic­ans by stay­ing around any longer.”


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.