Former Congressional Chief of Staff to Appear in Court on Pornography Charges

Snow begins to gather on a statue outside the US Capitol Building in Washington, DC, December 10, 2013. Fresh winter snow moved into the US mid-Atlantic region on Tuesday, shutting schools and offices in the nation's capital and elsewhere as the mid-section of the US remained in the grip of Arctic air that showed no signs of easing.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Elahe Izadi
Dec. 12, 2013, 8:52 a.m.

The former chief of staff to Sen. Lamar Al­ex­an­der will ap­pear in a U.S. dis­trict court Thursday on charges that he pos­sessed child por­no­graphy, ac­cord­ing to a crim­in­al com­plaint filed by the U.S. At­tor­ney’s Of­fice.

The com­plaint lays out the al­leg­a­tions against Ry­an Los­karn, 35, who was caught up in an in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to a movie pro­duc­tion com­pany that sold DVDs via mail and streamed videos for sale, the ma­jor­ity of which fea­tured young, nude boys, doc­u­ments show. The probe by the U.S. Postal In­spec­tion Ser­vice and the Toronto Po­lice Ser­vice began in 2010.

The com­plaint al­leges that Los­karn made sev­er­al pur­chases in 2010 and 2011, in­clud­ing movies sent to his Wash­ing­ton home. In­spect­ors con­duc­ted a search of his home this week, dur­ing which the com­plaint al­leges that Los­karn ap­peared to place an ex­tern­al com­puter hard drive, which in­cluded child por­no­graphy videos, out­side his win­dow. The com­plaint also al­leges that in­spect­ors con­nec­ted por­no­graph­ic video down­loads to his res­id­en­tial IP ad­dress.

The con­tent of the movies, as de­scribed in the doc­u­ment, in­clude sexu­al de­pic­tions of girls as young as 6 to 9 years old, ap­pear­ing with adults. The com­plaint also al­leges the hard drive con­tained “hun­dreds of videos de­pict­ing un­der­age boys en­gaged in sexu­ally ex­pli­cit con­duct.”

Los­karn could be reached for com­ment, and his law­yer, Stu­art A. Sears, de­clined to dis­cuss the case. Los­karn faces two charges: pos­ses­sion of child por­no­graphy, which car­ries a max­im­um of 10 years in pris­on, and at­tempt to dis­trib­ute child por­no­graphy, which car­ries a man­dat­ory min­im­um of fives years and a max­im­um of up to 20 years in pris­on.

The pro­sec­utors’ com­plaint and ac­com­pa­ny­ing state­ment of fact are at­tached be­low. Warn­ing: The lan­guage in the state­ment of facts is ex­traordin­ar­ily graph­ic and may be of­fens­ive to many read­ers.

Sarah Mimms contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
23 hours ago

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
1 days ago

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
1 days ago

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."