Warren Aims to Bolster National Security Credentials

The potential 2020 contender can use her new slot on the Armed Services Committee to patch a hole on her resume.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. gestures as she answers a question during an interview at her office in Boston, Thursday, Dec. 15, 2016.
AP Photo/Charles Krupa
Adam Wollner
Add to Briefcase
Adam Wollner
Jan. 2, 2017, 8 p.m.

In the new Con­gress, Eliza­beth War­ren is aim­ing to ad­dress the biggest hole in her polit­ic­al re­sume: for­eign policy.

Over the course of the past four years on Cap­it­ol Hill, the Mas­sachu­setts sen­at­or has carved out space as one of the Left’s lead­ing voices on eco­nom­ic is­sues, cast­ing her­self as an en­emy of Wall Street and a de­fend­er of the middle class. But when it came to the coun­try’s most heated na­tion­al se­cur­ity de­bates, she faded in­to the back­ground.

Over the next four years, though, that will cer­tainly change. War­ren snagged a spot on the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, where she will play an im­port­ant role in craft­ing de­fense and mil­it­ary policy as the new ad­min­is­tra­tion takes power. War­ren’s role on the in­flu­en­tial pan­el will al­low her to gain crit­ic­al for­eign policy ex­per­i­ence, as well as check off an­oth­er box if she chooses to seek high­er of­fice. Re­gard­less of wheth­er she runs for pres­id­ent in 2020, War­ren will have the op­por­tun­ity to be­come one of the Demo­crats’ most out­spoken lead­ers in this realm at a time when the party will be in the minor­ity and lack­ing in rising stars.

How ex­actly she goes about that, however, re­mains to be seen. As a re­l­at­ive novice on for­eign policy, she will have plenty of blanks to fill in when the 115th Con­gress is sworn in on Tues­day.

“If you have na­tion­al as­pir­a­tions, as I think she does, get­ting for­eign policy and na­tion­al se­cur­ity ex­per­i­ence is im­port­ant both sub­stant­ively and polit­ic­ally,” said Thomas Wright, the dir­ect­or of the Pro­ject on In­ter­na­tion­al Or­der and Strategy at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion. “It’s a nat­ur­al pro­gres­sion for her. I think it’s sort of un­clear ex­actly what is­sues she’ll fo­cus on.”

War­ren, a former Har­vard pro­fess­or whose three broth­ers served in the mil­it­ary, has waded in­to for­eign policy is­sues spar­ingly dur­ing her ten­ure in Wash­ing­ton. Her only ma­jor speech on the top­ic came in early 2014 at Geor­getown Uni­versity, where she struck an anti-in­ter­ven­tion­ist tone and urged the U.S. to be more con­sid­er­ate of ci­vil­ian deaths in war­fare. She’s traveled abroad only once as a sen­at­or, vis­it­ing Is­rael, the West Bank, and Jordan after the 2014 elec­tions. And she barely touched on for­eign af­fairs in her 2014 book, “A Fight­ing Chance,” fo­cus­ing on vet­er­ans who have fallen prey to fin­an­cial scams.

Oth­er than that, War­ren has gen­er­ally sup­por­ted spend­ing cuts in the de­fense budget, and has ad­voc­ated on be­half of the de­fense con­tract­ors and mil­it­ary bases in her home state. More re­cently, War­ren has spoken out against Don­ald Trump’s pick for sec­ret­ary of State, Rex Tiller­son, but has re­mained si­lent on his sec­ret­ary of De­fense nom­in­ee, re­tired Gen. James Mat­tis.

In a state­ment an­noun­cing her com­mit­tee ap­point­ment, War­ren said she would “fo­cus on mak­ing sure Con­gress provides ef­fect­ive sup­port and over­sight of the Armed Forces, mon­it­ors threats to na­tion­al se­cur­ity, and en­sures the re­spons­ible use of mil­it­ary force around the globe.” She ad­ded that the de­fense com­pan­ies and re­search labs in Mas­sachu­setts play a “crit­ic­al role” in strength­en­ing na­tion­al se­cur­ity.

“I think what she will prob­ably do is get in­to, giv­en her back­ground, things like de­fense pro­cure­ment, cost over­runs, that type of thing,” said Lawrence Korb, a na­tion­al se­cur­ity ex­pert who is a seni­or fel­low at the Cen­ter for Amer­ic­an Pro­gress.

In a re­cent in­ter­view with Bo­ston’s CBS af­fil­i­ate, War­ren said she wants to “make sure that every dol­lar we spend is a dol­lar we’re really get­ting some ef­fect­ive pro­tec­tion out of.”

“One of the is­sues that’s go­ing to be really im­port­ant to me in work­ing on Armed Ser­vices is about pro­tect­ing our mil­it­ary and our mil­it­ary fam­il­ies, but also mak­ing sure that we are cut­ting edge,” ad­ded War­ren, whose pre­de­cessors, Scott Brown and Ted Kennedy, also served on the com­mit­tee. “That’s our com­par­at­ive ad­vant­age here in Mas­sachu­setts.”

In ad­di­tion to de­fend­ing her state’s in­terests, it’s un­clear at this point wheth­er War­ren will take up a pet is­sue on a na­tion­al scale. For in­stance, Kirsten Gil­librand, an­oth­er po­ten­tial 2020 pres­id­en­tial con­tender, has be­come the lead­ing fig­ure in chan­ging the way the mil­it­ary handles sexu­al-as­sault cases.

But with an un­pre­dict­able Trump as­sum­ing the role of com­mand­er-in-chief, War­ren may be most ef­fect­ive serving broadly as a check on his ad­min­is­tra­tion.

“The ques­tion for her is really less on push­ing one is­sue, and it’s more mak­ing a sig­ni­fic­ant con­tri­bu­tion to the broad­er de­bate,” Wright said. “So I think that’s really what her role will prob­ably be, is to be one of the more out­spoken Demo­crats on na­tion­al se­cur­ity is­sues in gen­er­al, par­tic­u­larly giv­en that we’re in for a very volat­ile peri­od.”

War­ren’s al­lies also hope that she will take on this role, and think she can ap­ply her pop­u­list eco­nom­ic views to for­eign af­fairs.

“We need a strong check and bal­ance, and no one is bet­ter at en­sur­ing we’re not rig­ging the game for big in­ter­na­tion­al cor­por­a­tions in our for­eign policy than Eliza­beth War­ren,” said Adam Green, the cofounder of the Pro­gress­ive Change Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, which urged War­ren to run for pres­id­ent in 2016.

As Pres­id­ent Obama and Hil­lary Clin­ton take a step back from the polit­ic­al spot­light, Demo­crats are without a clear lead­er on for­eign policy. Tim Kaine, Chris Murphy, and Gil­librand all serve on either the Armed Ser­vices or For­eign Re­la­tions com­mit­tees (or both, in Kaine’s case). Cory Book­er will also join the For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee. Any of these sen­at­ors, War­ren in­cluded, could fill that void in the new year.

“There is a little bit of a va­cu­um, par­tic­u­larly giv­en that the Demo­crats are leav­ing and the Re­pub­lic­an ad­min­is­tra­tion is com­ing in,” Wright said. “This is a sign that she is step­ping up to the plate to fill that va­cu­um.”

What We're Following See More »
Mississippi Governor Signs Bill to Ban Abortions After 15 Weeks
11 hours ago
China Tariffs May Be Even Bigger Than Originally Proposed
11 hours ago

"President Trump is preparing to impose a package of $60 billion in annual tariffs against China, following through on a long-time threat that he says will punish China for intellectual property infringement and create more American jobs. The tariff package, which Trump plans to unveil by Friday, was confirmed by four senior administration officials. Senior aides had presented Trump with a $30 billion tariff package that would apply to a range of products, but Trump directed them to roughly double the scope of the new trade levies."

Trump Attorneys Have Offered Documents to Mueller’s Team
11 hours ago

"President Trump’s attorneys have provided the special counsel’s office with written descriptions that chronicle key moments under investigation in hopes of curtailing the scope of a presidential interview, according to two people familiar with the situation. Trump’s legal team recently shared the documents in an effort to limit any session between the president and special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to a few select topics" on order to "minimize his exposure. ... The lawyers are worried that Trump, who has a penchant for making erroneous claims, would be vulnerable in an hours-long interview."

Trump Isn’t Firing Mueller, Lawyer Says
20 hours ago

White House Lawyer Ty Cobb said that President Trump not considering firing special counsel Robert Mueller. Speculation swirled after Trump attacked the investigation on Twitter, and called out Mueller directly for the first time. “In response to media speculation and related questions being posed to the Administration," Cobb said, "...the President is not considering or discussing the firing of the Special Counsel, Robert Mueller." Several members of Congress, "including some top Republicans, warned Trump to not even think about terminating Mueller."

Rubio Says McCabe Should Have Been Allowed to Retire
1 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.