Defeated House Members Leave Door Cracked for 2018

More than a dozen incumbents lost in primaries or on Election Day.

Rep. Robert Dold campaigning in Chicago in 2012
AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast
Ally Mutnick
Add to Briefcase
Ally Mutnick
Dec. 14, 2016, 8 p.m.

Few of the in­cum­bents de­feated this year are ready to defin­it­ively close the chapter on their House ca­reers.

In in­ter­views dur­ing their fi­nal votes last week un­der the re­cently re­stored Cap­it­ol dome, sev­er­al of the mem­bers mak­ing in­vol­un­tary exits de­clined to rule out a 2018 comeback bid, and none had de­cided to re­tire from polit­ics al­to­geth­er.

Thir­teen in­cum­bents lost reelec­tion in 2016, with reas­ons ran­ging from re­dis­trict­ing to fed­er­al cor­rup­tion charges to swing seats that usu­ally change hands in pres­id­en­tial-elec­tion years. Eight came up short in the gen­er­al elec­tion, and five fell to primary chal­lengers. One of those who lost in a primary was Rep. Chaka Fat­tah, the Pennsylvania Demo­crat who later resigned and was sen­tenced this week to 10 years in pris­on.

“I’m sure that people would like me to run again,” said Demo­crat­ic Rep. Brad Ash­ford of Neb­raska, who nar­rowly lost his Omaha-based seat last month to Re­pub­lic­an Don Ba­con. “I would con­sider it. It’s something I en­joy do­ing too much to ever say nev­er.”

Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Dav­id Jolly of Flor­ida said there is a “very good chance” he will run again for the St. Peters­burg-based seat, but he ac­know­ledged he was also look­ing at some statewide races. Asked how a 2018 run would be dif­fer­ent, Jolly answered con­fid­ently: “We’d win.”

Jolly’s seat be­came sig­ni­fic­antly more Demo­crat­ic after court-ordered re­dis­trict­ing, and he re­ceived no fin­an­cial sup­port from na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­ans after he cri­ti­cized his col­leagues’ fun­drais­ing prac­tices in a con­tro­ver­sial 60 Minutes seg­ment that in­cluded hid­den-cam­era foot­age from in­side the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Con­gres­sion­al Com­mit­tee headquar­ters. Still, he lost to former Flor­ida Gov. Charlie Crist by just 4 points in a dis­trict Pres­id­ent Obama would have car­ried by 11 in 2012.

“Had we had any out­side help or had we had a few more weeks, we would have won it,” Jolly said.

In an in­ter­view earli­er this month with Na­tion­al Journ­al, in­com­ing NR­CC Chair­man Steve Stivers said he had been in con­tact with some fallen in­cum­bents as he pre­pares for re­cruit­ment sea­son. High on his wish list are Rep. Joe Heck of Nevada, who va­cated his seat for an un­suc­cess­ful Sen­ate bid, and Rep. Robert Dold of Illinois, who lost in a re­match with former Demo­crat­ic Rep. Brad Schneider.

Heck said he “sin­cerely” doubts he would run again for his seat, which will soon be filled by Demo­crat Jacky Rosen, but Dold said he hadn’t “closed any doors” or “made any de­cisions.”

“Bob Dold did everything right, and if this was an off-year elec­tion, if this wasn’t a pres­id­en­tial, Bob Dold would have won,” Stivers said. “And so the ques­tion is, how do you talk a guy in­to com­ing back for the third time?”

Dold lost by 5 points in a sub­urb­an Chica­go dis­trict where Trump was so un­pop­u­lar the NR­CC ran an ad prais­ing Dold for dis­avow­ing him. First elec­ted in 2010, Dold was one of four Re­pub­lic­an in­cum­bents fa­cing a chal­lenge from the Demo­crat they un­seated in 2014; only two pre­vailed.

Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Frank Guinta of New Hamp­shire just barely lost his fourth match­up against former Demo­crat­ic Rep. Car­ol Shea-Port­er in the swingi­est dis­trict in the na­tion.

Guinta faced un­fa­vor­able head­winds—he’s nev­er won the seat in a pres­id­en­tial-elec­tion year—but his 1-point loss was sur­pris­ingly close after he nearly didn’t make it out of the Septem­ber primary. He was saddled with a cam­paign fin­ance scan­dal after the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion found he il­leg­ally ac­cep­ted $355,000 in cam­paign funds from his par­ents.

“Where is this com­ing from?” Guinta re­spon­ded when asked if he might run again in two years, just as he did after los­ing the seat in 2012. He brushed off ques­tions about his fu­ture, re­peat­ing three times that he was fo­cus­ing on fin­ish­ing his term.

Oth­er toppled in­cum­bents would also face up­hill battles re­turn­ing to Con­gress. Rep. Mike Honda of Cali­for­nia, who lost a con­ten­tious cam­paign against fel­low Demo­crat Ro Khanna, was still be­ing in­vest­ig­ated by the House Eth­ics Com­mit­tee for al­legedly im­prop­erly mix­ing con­gres­sion­al and cam­paign activ­it­ies when he lost on Elec­tion Day. In an in­ter­view, Honda said he hasn’t said no to run­ning again but would wait to see “what kind of job Ro does” and how his con­stitu­ents feel.

Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Ren­ee Ellmers of North Car­o­lina, who lost in the only mem­ber-vs.-mem­ber race of the cycle, said she had “no idea” if she would mount an­oth­er bid. She fell in a June primary after court-ordered re­dis­trict­ing led to her and Re­pub­lic­an Rep. George Hold­ing run­ning in the same dis­trict. Billing him­self as the more con­ser­vat­ive can­did­ate, Hold­ing won eas­ily as anti­es­tab­lish­ment forces united against Ellmers.

Demo­crats cut in­to the GOP’s his­tor­ic ma­jor­ity by 6 seats, as Trump de­feated Hil­lary Clin­ton and cap­tured the White House. Of the eight in­cum­bents who lost in Novem­ber, six were Re­pub­lic­ans.

The NR­CC already plans to tar­get the Flor­ida and New Jer­sey dis­tricts that GOP Reps. John Mica and Scott Gar­rett lost. In an in­ter­view, Mica said he wouldn’t dis­cuss his fu­ture un­til Jan. 3. Gar­rett said re­cently he was un­sure what he would do next. It’s un­likely either will be re­cruited to run again after fall­ing to well-fun­ded, first-time Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates.

While the midterms provided fa­vor­able en­vir­on­ments for Re­pub­lic­ans un­der Obama, the dy­nam­ics of 2018 are in­her­ently dif­fer­ent, as the con­gres­sion­al races will be waged with a Re­pub­lic­an in the White House.

That could af­fect wheth­er someone like Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Cresent Hardy of Nevada, who scored a 2014 up­set be­cause of low Demo­crat­ic turnout in the Las Ve­gas-based dis­trict Obama car­ried by double di­gits two years earli­er, runs again. After los­ing by 4 points last month, Hardy didn’t im­me­di­ately re­ject the idea.

“I haven’t thought about it at all,” Hardy said. “You nev­er say nev­er.”

Kimberly Railey contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
Rosenstein Holds Presser On Russian Indictments
2 days ago
U.S. Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Interference
2 days ago

The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."

Gates Said to Be Finalizing a Plea Deal
2 days ago

"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."

Another Defeat for Immigration Legislation in the Senate
3 days ago

"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "

House Intel Panel Could Charge Bannon with Contempt
3 days ago

"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.