Outlook: Wrapping Up the 114th Congress

Spending, defense, and medical-research bills will dominate the final week’s agenda.

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik
Alex Rogers
Add to Briefcase
Alex Rogers
Dec. 4, 2016, 8:01 p.m.

Be­fore Demo­crats go home and drink to their blues, and Re­pub­lic­ans to their vic­tor­ies, Con­gress needs to spend at least one more week in Wash­ing­ton check­ing off an end-of-the year list.

This week, the Sen­ate looks to pass the 21st Cen­tury Cures Act. It’s a $6.3 bil­lion bill that funds a vari­ety of meas­ures—Vice Pres­id­ent Joe Biden’s “can­cer moon­shot,” Pres­id­ent Obama’s Pre­ci­sion Medi­cine Ini­ti­at­ive, a ma­jor Alzheimer’s re­search pro­gram, and a sig­ni­fic­ant grant to ad­dress the opioid crisis—and ush­ers in con­sequen­tial re­forms that quick­en the drug- and device-ap­prov­al re­view pro­cess at the Food and Drug Ad­min­is­tra­tion. The House passed it last week and the Sen­ate is ex­pec­ted to do the same over the op­pos­i­tion of lib­er­als like Sens. Bernie Sanders and Eliza­beth War­ren.

After that, the Sen­ate will con­sider the an­nu­al de­fense-policy bill, which re­portedly in­cludes the largest troop pay raise in six years, and an en­ergy-policy pack­age.

Most im­port­antly, Con­gress needs to pass by Fri­day a short-term fund­ing bill, which the De­fense De­part­ment strongly op­poses and which wouldn’t in­clude the troops’ raise. The spend­ing bill, known as a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion, could stretch gov­ern­ment fund­ing in­to May, help­ing the Sen­ate con­firm early next year a chunk of the 1,000-plus polit­ic­ally ap­poin­ted po­s­i­tions ne­ces­sary to run the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion. An aide to House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Kev­in Mc­Carthy said the cham­ber will likely vote to ex­tend gov­ern­ment fund­ing in­to next spring.

With the spend­ing bill, Con­gress will keep the lights on through the New Year and provide res­ol­u­tions to con­flicts it has faced throughout 2016. The bill is linked to ne­go­ti­ations over an im­port­ant wa­ter-in­fra­struc­ture bill, which will likely in­clude up to $100 mil­lion in aid for Flint, Mich., a com­munity that has been suf­fer­ing from lead-tain­ted drink­ing wa­ter. The CR may also give dis­aster as­sist­ance to Louisi­ana and oth­er states af­fected by dev­ast­at­ing flood­ing.

Here’s what else is on tap this week:


The Sen­ate is ex­pec­ted to pass the 2017 Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act this week after the House voted over­whelm­ingly to ap­prove the le­gis­la­tion last Fri­day. On Tues­day, the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee holds a hear­ing on “Emer­ging U.S. De­fense Chal­lenges and World­wide Threats,” while the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee holds a hear­ing on “De­feat­ing the Ir­a­ni­an Threat Net­work: Op­tions for Coun­ter­ing Ir­a­ni­an Prox­ies.” And off the Hill that morn­ing, Rep. Adam Schiff, the rank­ing mem­ber of the House In­tel­li­gence com­mit­tee, speaks at a Chris­ti­an Sci­ence Mon­it­or break­fast.

On the House side, the Armed Ser­vices sub­com­mit­tee on mil­it­ary per­son­nel is sched­uled to hold a hear­ing Wed­nes­day on the Cali­for­nia Na­tion­al Guard’s bo­nus-re­pay­ment is­sue.


The House and Sen­ate will try to move a wa­ter in­fra­struc­ture bill that could also be the vehicle for an aid pack­age to Flint, Mich.—the res­ult of months of bi­par­tis­an ne­go­ti­ation between the House and Sen­ate that au­thor­izes money for 25 pro­jects in 17 states. The ori­gin­al Sen­ate bill car­ried a $220 mil­lion fund for Flint and oth­er com­munit­ies af­flic­ted with lead pol­lu­tion, but le­gis­lat­ors have in­dic­ated that the fi­nal ver­sion may be closer to the $170 mil­lion pack­age passed by the House.

Ne­go­ti­at­ors will also scramble to wrap up a bicam­er­al en­ergy bill be­fore the end of the week, iron­ing out policy re­lated to li­que­fied-nat­ur­al-gas ex­ports, and ad­dress­ing the Cali­for­nia drought and wild­fires.

House Re­pub­lic­ans will ques­tion the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency’s hand­ling of the con­sent de­cree with Volk­swa­gen over the auto­maker’s emis­sions-cheat­ing scan­dal at an En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee hear­ing Tues­day. Also Tues­day, the House Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee will fo­cus on two cases of data ma­nip­u­la­tion at a U.S. Geo­lo­gic­al Sur­vey lab in Col­or­ado.


The 21st Cen­tury Cures Act will be head­ing to the Sen­ate floor Monday after it over­whelm­ingly passed the House by a vote of 392-26. It is ex­pec­ted to clear the Sen­ate, des­pite some Demo­crats’ con­tin­ued com­plaints about the bill.

The new ver­sion of the bill is nearly 1,000 pages long and in­cludes pro­vi­sions to stream­line the re­search and de­vel­op­ment of med­ic­al products, over­haul the men­tal-health sys­tem, and make changes to Medi­care.

The le­gis­la­tion lowers the amount of money des­ig­nated for the Na­tion­al In­sti­tutes of Health from the ori­gin­ally slated $8.75 bil­lion to $4.8 bil­lion, and it is no longer man­dat­ory but must be ap­pro­pri­ated each year. There is also $500 mil­lion for FDA and $1 bil­lion in grants to states to ad­dress the opioid crisis.

As it is likely law­makers will be busy ham­mer­ing out the de­tails of a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion be­fore leav­ing, com­mit­tee activ­ity as it relates to health policy is thin. But there is an En­ergy and Com­merce health sub­com­mit­tee hear­ing re­lated to the Ag­ri­cul­ture De­part­ment’s cat­fish-in­spec­tion pro­gram on Wed­nes­day.


The fo­cal point of Pres­id­ent Obama’s week will be his fi­nal speech on the battle against ter­ror­ism. On Tues­day, he will travel to Mac­Dill Air Force Base in Tampa to meet with com­batants in that struggle and re­view his ad­min­is­tra­tion’s eight-year re­cord in coun­terter­ror­ism. Mac­Dill is home to the U.S. Spe­cial Op­er­a­tions Com­mand as well as CENT­COM. He will spend the rest of the week at the White House.

Daniel Newhauser, Adam Wollner, Jason Plautz, Erin Durkin and George E. Condon Jr. contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
Perry: I Regret Calling for Elimination of DOE
17 hours ago
Mnuchin Avoids Specifics In Questions From Wyden
17 hours ago

Oregon Senator Ron Wyden, ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, grilled Steven Mnuchin, Donald Trump's nominee for treasury secretary, and was unhappy with Mnuchin's answers, complaining about a lack of specifics. "We didn't hear what you'd do to fight ISIS," Wyden said. "We didn't get any specifics on Medicare"

Mnuchin Defending His Record at OneWest Bank
18 hours ago

Donald Trump's nominee to become the next secretary of the Treasury Department, Steven Mnuchin, has spent much of his opening statement defending his record at OneWest Bank, which he co-founded and where he served as chairman and CEO. OneWest Bank has been criticized as a "foreclosure machine" following the Great Recession in 2008 and Mnuchin has been criticized for laying people off during the crisis.

Head Of Ethics Office Wants To Testify Publicly
20 hours ago

The latest move in an ongoing battle between Republicans and the Office of Government Ethics came earlier this week when OGE Director Walter Schaub sent a letter to Rep. Jason Chaffetz, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Chaffetz had requested "a private meeting on Jan. 23 with Chaffetz, ranking member Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and staff members." Schaub responded with a letter asking that Chaffetz reconsider his stance that no public testimony would be acceptable and that Chaffetz call Schaub in front of the committee for public testimony.

“Nanny-Gate” Redux for Republican Nominees
1 days ago

Rep. Mick Mulvaney, President-elect Donald Trump's choice to run the Office of Management and Budget, admitted he "failed to pay more than $15,000 in payroll taxes for a household worker" from 2000-2004. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, noting that similar lapses have torpedoed Democratic nominees, said Mulvaney should withdraw. Meanwhile, Commerce secretary nominee Wilbur Ross "admitted at his Senate confirmation hearing Wednesday that he recently fired a household employee who could not provide proof that they could legally work in the country."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.