GOP Wary of Quick Cuba Policy Rollback

Most Republicans don’t like Obama’s approach to Cuba, but that doesn’t mean they—or Donald Trump—will immediately reverse it.

Onlookers await a motorcade carrying Fidel Castro's remains in Havana on Wednesday.
AP Photo/Natacha Pisarenko
Alex Rogers
Add to Briefcase
Alex Rogers
Nov. 30, 2016, 8 p.m.

After the death of Fi­del Castro, Pres­id­ent-elect Don­ald Trump quickly con­demned the long­time Cuban lead­er’s leg­acy “of fir­ing squads, theft, un­ima­gin­able suf­fer­ing, poverty, and the deni­al of fun­da­ment­al hu­man rights.” The re­marks were well re­ceived by Re­pub­lic­ans in Con­gress, who deemed Pres­id­ent Obama’s bland con­dol­ences to the Cuban people as a pathet­ic con­ceal­ment of a tyr­ant’s ter­rible re­cord.

But Trump didn’t—and has yet to—ex­plain ex­actly how U.S.-Cuba re­la­tions will dif­fer un­der his pres­id­ency. And some key Re­pub­lic­ans in Con­gress have so far res­isted call­ing for a com­plete over­haul of Obama’s his­tor­ic policy of en­gage­ment with Cuba, des­pite their past vo­cal op­pos­i­tion to it.

In in­ter­views this week, Sens. Ted Cruz and Marco Ru­bio, two Cuban-Amer­ic­ans and harsh crit­ics of Obama, did not say wheth­er they would or would not want the U.S. to cut off dip­lo­mat­ic ties, which the U.S. and Cuba agreed to re­store in 2015. Last year, Ru­bio said he’d re­verse the de­cision to re­open an em­bassy in Havana if elec­ted pres­id­ent, while Cruz said he’d work as a sen­at­or to dis­ap­prove fund­ing for it.

Oth­er Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors on the For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee—Sens. Ron John­son, Johnny Isak­son, and John Bar­rasso—also wouldn’t dir­ectly an­swer the ques­tion this week, want­ing to wait to hear more spe­cif­ics from the in­com­ing Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion.

“We’ve got a new pres­id­ent com­ing in, we’ve got an old dic­tat­or gone, we’ve got a lot of Cuban-Amer­ic­an in­terests,” said Isak­son. “I’ll wait and be guided by what hap­pens. Ac­cord­ingly, I don’t want to pree­mpt either the new pres­id­ent on what his new for­eign policy po­s­i­tions are go­ing to be or the Cuban-Amer­ic­ans at this point.”

Des­pite the con­cerns about open­ing up re­la­tions with the re­press­ive Castro re­gime, which is now led by Fi­del’s broth­er Raúl, busi­nesses from the ag­ri­cul­tur­al to the tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions in­dus­tries are in­ter­ested in ex­pand­ing in­to the Cuban mar­ket. And some mem­bers of Con­gress be­lieve that U.S. dip­lomacy and busi­ness in­terests will yield hu­man­it­ari­an gains in Cuba and for­eign policy be­ne­fits for Amer­ica.

“One thing you don’t want to do is go back to the policies of the last sev­er­al dec­ades that have not worked,” Sen. Ben Cardin, the top Demo­crat on the For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee, told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “What we did was isol­ate Amer­ica in our own hemi­sphere.”

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s secret ne­go­ti­ations with Cuba over the past few years have pro­duced ab­rupt changes. Com­mer­cial flights have re­sumed for the first time in five dec­ades. Star­wood Ho­tels and Car­ni­val have ex­pan­ded to Cuba, which is look­ing to triple its rev­en­ue from the tour­ism in­dustry over the next 15 years, ac­cord­ing to the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion. While the travel ban and em­bargo are still in ef­fect, Amer­ic­ans can now travel there for “people-to-people edu­ca­tion” and bring back as much rum and as many ci­gars as they like.

Trump can uni­lat­er­ally dir­ect vari­ous de­part­ments to undo what Obama has done, but ad­voc­ates and even some de­tract­ors of Obama’s strategy say it’ll be dif­fi­cult now that U.S. com­pan­ies and cit­izens have taken a great­er in­terest in Cuba. In an in­ter­view, Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Jeff Flake doubted Trump would re­voke what were in his mind some of the biggest changes: the meas­ures mak­ing it easi­er to travel there and to de­crease the now-un­res­tric­ted re­mit­tances to Cuban na­tion­als. “To roll back that would be really tough,” he said.

While Flake is per­haps the most high-pro­file Re­pub­lic­an sup­port­er of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s out­reach to Cuba, his op­tim­ism gains more cre­dence by the hard-liners’ hes­it­ancy to un­der­mine it. When asked if the U.S. should cut off dip­lo­mat­ic re­la­tions—re­turn­ing the re­la­tion­ship between the two coun­tries to what it was be­fore Obama—Sen. Dav­id Per­due, an­oth­er Re­pub­lic­an mem­ber of the For­eign Re­la­tions com­mit­tee, quickly replied, “It is what it is.” He then ad­ded that the U.S. needs to be “very care­ful about con­tinu­ing to open up any re­la­tion­ship with them un­til we see pro­gress on the hu­man-rights side.”

So far, the pres­id­ent-elect’s views have been hard to de­cipher. In Septem­ber 2015, Trump said he wanted a stronger “deal”—that the old policies had las­ted long “enough”—and that the concept of open­ing up to Cuba was “fine.” Yet just this week, Trump tweeted, “If Cuba is un­will­ing to make a bet­ter deal for the Cuban people, the Cuban/Amer­ic­an people and the U.S. as a whole, I will ter­min­ate deal.”

His in­com­ing team might be split as well. Trump’s new deputy na­tion­al se­cur­ity ad­viser, K.T. Mc­Far­land, wrote on her web­site in 2014 that Obama’s en­gage­ment with Cuba was “the right thing to do—but not for the reas­ons he gave,” warn­ing of the dangers of Rus­sia or China de­vel­op­ing a closer re­la­tion­ship to Cuba. The site was taken down after Na­tion­al Journ­al emailed Mc­Far­land for com­ment.

Some mem­bers of Trump’s staff, however, clearly op­pose Obama’s dip­lo­mat­ic ef­forts with Cuba. Trump’s new na­tion­al se­cur­ity ad­viser, re­tired Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn, con­siders Cuba an ally of rad­ic­al Is­lam. Trump’s pick to be CIA dir­ect­or, Rep. Mike Pom­peo, sharply cri­ti­cizes Obama’s Cuban policy, as does Maur­i­cio Claver-Car­one, a new mem­ber of the trans­ition team for the Treas­ury De­part­ment.

Trump will also be un­der pres­sure from some con­ser­vat­ives who would like him to tar­get vari­ous as­pects of Obama’s strategy. Cruz has re­cently called for the U.S. to end mil­it­ary and counter-nar­cot­ic en­gage­ments with Cuba.

Oth­ers have called for broad­er changes. Mike Gonza­lez, a seni­or fel­low at the Her­it­age Found­a­tion, said the pres­id­ent-elect should end com­mer­cial flights to Cuba, en­force travel re­stric­tions, and send a mor­al state­ment by hold­ing a high-pro­file meet­ing with Cuban dis­sid­ents. “The first thing is change the tone to­ward the re­gime and the op­pos­i­tion,” wrote Gonza­lez in an email.

Re­ports by Bloomberg and New­s­week have in­dic­ated that Trump’s com­pany has long held a com­mer­cial in­terest in the is­land, even as Trump con­tin­ued to pub­licly cri­ti­cize the Castro re­gime.

“Of course, we should keep the em­bargo in place,” Trump wrote in a 1999 Miami Her­ald op-ed. “We should keep it un­til Castro is gone.”

What We're Following See More »
Apple CEO To Meet With Trump
33 minutes ago

Apple CEO Tim Cook will meet with President Trump today, "at a time of heightened trade tensions between the U.S. and China with technology caught up in the spat. Both countries have proposed import tariffs on each others' products, but the U.S. has been tough on Chinese technology firms." China is an important market for Apple, and Cook is expected to bring up the worsening trade relationship.

Mick Mulvaney Admits To Selling Access As Representative
55 minutes ago
District Court: Trump Must Reopen DACA
1 hours ago

U.S. District Judge John D. Bates ordered the Trump Administration to continue DACA, and for the first time, ordered it be reopened to new applicants. Bates said the decision to end the immigration program was "'arbitrary and capricious' and therefore 'unlawful.' However, he stayed his ruling for 90 days to give the Department of Homeland Security a chance to provide more solid reasoning for ending the program." Bates is the third judge to rule against the Trump administration. "Federal judges in California and New York have also blocked the administration’s plans on [the same] grounds, and ordered the administration to renew work permits for immigrants enrolled in the program."

Supreme Court Takes Up Travel Ban
1 hours ago

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments today over Trump's third travel ban, which "the court allowed to go into effect while the case was litigated." Government lawyers are expected to argue that President Trump has the constitutional authority to exclude foreigners from traveling to the United States. Based in-part on President Trump's own rhetoric, critics have called the measure an unconstitutional "Muslim ban" that violates religious freedom. The highly-anticipated argument will be the last of the term, and has drawn widespread public attention. "For the first time since the same-sex-marriage arguments in 2015, the court is allowing same-day distribution of the session's audio," and Justice Sotomayor has opted to hear the case, despite a broken shoulder. Lower courts "have ruled all three versions either violate federal law or are unconstitutional."

Republican Lesko Wins Arizona Election
1 hours ago

"Republican Debbie Lesko won the House special election in Arizona Tuesday night," winning 53 percent of the vote. The race was closer than expected, however, with Democratic challenger Hiral Tipirneni winning 47 percent. The single-digit margin "is the latest evidence that Republicans face a punishing midterm environment, even in Trump-friendly territory." National Republican groups dumped over $1 million into the district, whereas National Democrats "largely stayed on the sidelines."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.