Kerry, Iranian Official Continue Discussions on Interim Deal

Jordain Carney, National Journal
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Jordain Carney, National Journal
Dec. 16, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

U.S. Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry spoke with his Ir­a­ni­an coun­ter­part in search of a path for­ward on the in­ter­im nuc­le­ar deal reached last month.

A seni­or State De­part­ment of­fi­cial said on Monday that the week­end con­ver­sa­tion fo­cused on “the im­port­ance of mov­ing for­ward” on the agree­ment reached in Geneva and “main­tain­ing a con­struct­ive at­mo­sphere as the ne­go­ti­ations con­tin­ue.”

The talks — which took place dur­ing Kerry’s flight to Vi­et­nam — fol­low the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s an­nounce­ment last week that it was tar­get­ing more than a dozen in­di­vidu­als and com­pan­ies for al­legedly vi­ol­at­ing the sanc­tions against Ir­an. The de­cision bars the de­sign­ees from en­ga­ging in trans­ac­tions with U.S. in­di­vidu­als and al­lows the United States to freeze any as­sets cur­rently un­der its jur­is­dic­tion, as well as any that fall in­to its con­trol in the fu­ture.

Za­rif told the Wash­ing­ton Post that des­pite re­ports to the con­trary, the new des­ig­na­tions did not end the ne­go­ti­ations between Ir­an, the United States, the United King­dom, France, Ger­many, Rus­sia, and China over Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram.

“As Mark Twain rightly poin­ted out, the news of their de­mise is greatly ex­ag­ger­ated,” he said. “I be­lieve we need to have a re­as­sess­ment of how we want to pro­ceed — every­body needs to do that — go back to the ne­go­ti­at­ing table with a view to re­mov­ing these obstacles and mov­ing for­ward.”

He ad­ded that he has also been in con­tact with of­fi­cials from oth­er coun­tries in­volved with the ne­go­ti­ations, as well as Cath­er­ine Ashton, the European Uni­on’s for­eign policy chief, on how to move for­ward.

This art­icle was pub­lished in Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire, which is pro­duced in­de­pend­ently by Na­tion­al Journ­al Group un­der con­tract with the Nuc­le­ar Threat Ini­ti­at­ive. NTI is a non­profit, non­par­tis­an group work­ing to re­duce glob­al threats from nuc­le­ar, bio­lo­gic­al, and chem­ic­al weapons.

What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
11 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
IT’S ALL CLINTON
Reliable Poll Data Coming in RE: Debate #1
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
×