AGAINST THE GRAIN

How Obama Inadvertently Set the Stage for Trump’s Presidency

His healthy job approval ratings masked a deep, widespread dissatisfaction of a country desperate for change.

President-elect Donald Trump shakes hands with Vice President-elect Mike Pence as he gives his acceptance speech in New York.
AP Photo/John Locher
Josh Kraushaar
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Josh Kraushaar
Nov. 9, 2016, 4:43 a.m.

Don­ald Trump re­made the Re­pub­lic­an Party along the way to his shock­ing rise to the pres­id­ency. One of his un­wit­ting ac­com­plices was Pres­id­ent Obama.

In­stead of of­fer­ing voters a de­tailed policy agenda, Obama won the pres­id­ency in part thanks to his iden­tity, an iden­tity that power­fully ad­dressed a his­tor­ic­al wrong. In the pro­cess, he made it pos­sible for Trump to ad­vance to the pres­id­ency on the strength of an en­tirely dif­fer­ent sort of iden­tity, one that ap­pealed to an in­tensely loy­al base of white, work­ing-class voters.

Obama’s mis­take was re­fus­ing to ac­know­ledge the im­port of the Re­pub­lic­an wave elec­tions in 2010 and 2014 and de­clin­ing to pivot to the middle, which fueled the in­tens­ity of the con­ser­vat­ive op­pos­i­tion. By spend­ing his fi­nal two years do­ing end-runs around Con­gress on im­mig­ra­tion and res­ist­ing any changes to his sig­na­ture health care law, he all but in­vited Trump’s auto­crat­ic prom­ises to fix things.

Obama and his leg­acy were among the biggest losers in Tues­day’s as­ton­ish­ing up­set. Re­pub­lic­ans will now ex­er­cise the vast powers of the pres­id­ency and con­trol the Sen­ate and the House by com­fort­able mar­gins, and they will al­most cer­tainly roll back Obama’s health care law. If Trump lives up to his pledge to ap­point a con­ser­vat­ive jur­ist to fill the Scalia va­cancy, the Su­preme Court will have a con­ser­vat­ive ma­jor­ity in the years ahead. The mur­der­ous tur­moil in the Middle East and on­go­ing IS­IS threat to the Amer­ic­an home­land were ma­jor factors in this elec­tion, as polit­ic­ally sig­ni­fic­ant as Trump’s ig­nor­ance about for­eign af­fairs. Obama’s un­will­ing­ness to call ter­ror­ism by its name, pre­fer­ring to preach about Is­lamo­pho­bia in the wake of hein­ous ter­ror­ist at­tacks abroad, was an un­der­ap­pre­ci­ated factor in Trump’s im­prob­able can­did­acy.

From the be­gin­ning of her cam­paign, Hil­lary Clin­ton chose to mo­bil­ize the Demo­crat­ic base, run as a third term of Obama’s pres­id­ency, and de­cline to of­fer many policy dis­tinc­tions. Any­one hop­ing for a more cent­rist ad­min­is­tra­tion had to read between the lines, or de­cipher art­ful leaks. On pa­per, her strategy made a lot of sense: Demo­crats feared that if she raised ques­tions about the Ir­an deal or Obama­care, the Obama co­ali­tion would lose its en­ergy. Break­ing from Obama was as fraught with risk for Demo­crats as break­ing with Trump was for Re­pub­lic­ans. As it turned out, though, dis­af­fected voters wanted change re­gard­less of its agent, and Clin­ton’s cau­tious ap­proach pleased only Demo­crat­ic true be­liev­ers.

After the Demo­crat­ic con­ven­tion, Clin­ton spent pre­cious little time in the blue-wall Rust Belt states, many of which ended up vot­ing for Trump and as­sur­ing her polit­ic­al de­mise. The Mid­west­ern white vote, which gave Obama wide­spread sup­port in 2012, turned on him dur­ing his second term. One telling an­ec­dote: To­ward the end of the cam­paign, Obama re­portedly wanted to cam­paign for Clin­ton in Iowa, the state that launched his own polit­ic­al ca­reer. He was in­formed the state was out of reach—a clear sign that he wouldn’t be an as­set in per­suad­ing any re­main­ing un­de­cided voters.

Many poll­sters and ex­perts dis­missed the per­sist­ent and over­whelm­ing ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans who thought the coun­try was on the wrong track, in­stead hold­ing out hope that Obama’s per­son­al pop­ular­ity was a more im­port­ant in­dic­at­or. What we saw from the elec­tion res­ults was that Obama’s cha­risma and likab­il­ity masked deep dis­sat­is­fac­tion with his policies. Clin­ton’s eth­ic­al prob­lems over her email serv­er, the sug­ges­tion of pay-for-play at the Clin­ton Found­a­tion, and her tone-deaf polit­ic­al sens­ib­il­ity all figured in her de­feat. But if voters had felt good about the coun­try’s dir­ec­tion, Clin­ton would have cruised to the White House. As it stands, Trump is on track to win more elect­or­al votes than any Re­pub­lic­an since George H.W. Bush in 1988.

After Trump’s vic­tory speech, Clin­ton strategist James Carville lamen­ted on MS­N­BC: “We’re a party without a lead­er.” The big ques­tion is wheth­er Demo­crats will listen to the polit­ic­al ad­vice of their out­go­ing pres­id­ent—an ap­proach that led them badly awry in three of the last four elec­tions—or wheth­er they’ll look to forge a more cent­rist path, per­haps with the ad­di­tion of some anti-Trump Re­pub­lic­ans in the fold.

What We're Following See More »
PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
SHUT DOWN MISLEADING FALSEHOODS
Facebook To Cut Down On Govt-Sponsored Info Campaigns
11 hours ago
BREAKING

Facebook "outlined new measures it is taking to combat what it calls 'information operations' that go well beyond the phenomenon known as fake news" on Thursday. Facebook acknowledged that there are governments using its platform as a tool to launch propaganda information campaigns and "manipulate public opinion in other countries. ... Facebook suspended 30,000 accounts in France ahead of last Sunday’s first-round presidential election."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
15 hours ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
IN 2014
Pentagon Warned Flynn Not To Accept Foreign Payments
17 hours ago
BREAKING
WOULD PUSH DEADLINE TO MAY 5
One-Week Spending Bill On The Table
17 hours ago
BREAKING

Members of Congress are eyeing a one-week spending bill which would keep the government open past the Friday night deadline, giving lawmakers an extra week to iron out a long-term deal to fund the government. Without any action, the government would run out of funding starting at midnight Saturday. “I am optimistic that a final funding package will be completed soon," said Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login