OFF TO THE RACES

Relax, America: We’ll Survive the Election

It’s been a bruising stretch, but Clinton still looks like the winner, and the Senate is still up in the air.

Hillary Clinton speaks at a rally at Pitt Community College in Winterville, N.C., on Thursday.
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik
Nov. 3, 2016, 8:01 p.m.

When Ger­ald Ford was sworn in­to of­fice after Pres­id­ent Nix­on’s resig­na­tion, he said, “My fel­low Amer­ic­ans, our long na­tion­al night­mare is over.” My guess is that a lot of people are look­ing for­ward to Elec­tion Day with the same feel­ing.

Hil­lary Clin­ton re­mains a sol­id fa­vor­ite to win the pres­id­ency. The only ques­tion is wheth­er she will win 272 elect­or­al votes, just two over the min­im­um needed, or closer to 300 or 310. The dif­fer­ence would likely turn on Flor­ida and North Car­o­lina. If she loses both, she’ll just skate by. If she wins both, her total would clear the 300 mark. Not that na­tion­al polling mat­ters much right now, oth­er than as an easy means to keep score, but poll­sters in both parties think her lead over Don­ald Trump is between 2 and 5 points. The former cuts things a bit close; the lat­ter would provide a very sol­id win giv­en the clear di­vi­sions in the coun­try today.

Demo­crats are still likely to come out on top in the Sen­ate, but prob­ably not with the kind of mar­gin they would have had be­fore the Clin­ton email mess re­sur­faced. Ten days or so ago, Trump was crater­ing. As a res­ult, the en­thu­si­asm of Re­pub­lic­an voters had be­gun to flag and few­er were mak­ing it through the poll screens for “likely voters,” caus­ing Demo­crat­ic mar­gins to in­crease. There has clearly been a shift since then. Per­haps it was simply a mat­ter of Re­pub­lic­ans com­ing home. Or maybe it was be­cause FBI Dir­ect­or James Comey’s an­nounce­ment last week was ice wa­ter that cooled the ar­dor of Demo­crats, not to men­tion in­de­pend­ents who were start­ing to edge to­ward Demo­crats. Since then, GOP voters have reen­gaged and in­de­pend­ents have be­gun eas­ing back to­ward Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates.

As a con­sequence, we are now more likely to see a Demo­crat­ic net gain in the Sen­ate of between four and six seats, not the five to sev­en seats of about a week ago. The best tar­gets for Demo­crats re­main Sens. Mark Kirk of Illinois, Ron John­son of Wis­con­sin, and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania. It is still quite pos­sible that John­son or Toomey could pull off an up­set, but it is much harder to see that hap­pen­ing for Kirk. The next best op­por­tun­it­ies for Demo­crats seem to be the races against Sen. Kelly Ayotte of New Hamp­shire and for the open GOP seat in In­di­ana, both of which are really close with maybe a slight edge for Re­pub­lic­ans. Sens. Richard Burr of North Car­o­lina and Roy Blunt of Mis­souri are still em­broiled in very dif­fi­cult races. Things may have edged very slightly in their fa­vor, but the races could go either way. Sen. Marco Ru­bio is not go­ing to win Flor­ida by a land­slide, but the odds of him win­ning are still very high. In the lone vul­ner­able Demo­crat­ic seat, the mo­mentum seems to have shif­ted away from GOP Rep. Joe Heck and to­ward Demo­crat Cath­er­ine Cortez Masto.

In the House, the over and un­der is about 15 seats. The odds of Demo­crats win­ning more than 15 are about the same as them win­ning few­er than that. In any event, the 30 seats needed to take con­trol were out of reach even when Trump was tank­ing.

We have seen hun­dreds of polls come out in re­cent weeks, some of high qual­ity, most of du­bi­ous ac­cur­acy. While I still sug­gest that afi­cion­ados fo­cus more on the poll av­er­ages than on spe­cif­ic sound­ings, any­one de­term­ined to be guided by a single poll should stick to ones con­duc­ted by ABC News and The Wash­ing­ton Post, CBS News and The New York Times, NBC News and The Wall Street Journ­al, CNN, and Fox News. As a gen­er­al rule, sur­veys based on live tele­phone in­ter­views should be giv­en more cre­dence than ones us­ing on­line ques­tions or robo-polls. Stand-alone polls are more steady and re­li­able than nightly track­ing polls, which tend to be pretty er­rat­ic.

For ex­ample, the ABC/Wash­ing­ton Post poll is very re­li­able, but I would put more weight on a full-blown ABC/Post read­ing than on its nightly track­ing poll, which showed a highly un­likely shift of 13 points in a little more than a week, from Clin­ton up by 12 points to be­hind by 1 (as of Thursday morn­ing she was back up 2 points). The stand-alone CBS/NYT poll had it at 3, square in the range of where most private poll­sters sus­pect the race to be.

My ad­vice is for folks to ease off the caf­feine, maybe watch less tele­vi­sion news, take in a movie, play a round of golf, or do whatever lowers their blood pres­sure and pre­serves their san­ity. This coun­try has sur­vived a lot, and it will still stand tall whatever hap­pens on Tues­day.

What We're Following See More »
FOR IMPROPER SPENDING, INFLUENCE
Trump Inauguration Spending Now Under Investigation
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal prosecutors in Manhattan are investigating whether President Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee misspent some of the record $107 million it raised from donations, people familiar with the matter said. The criminal probe by the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office, which is in its early stages, also is examining whether some of the committee’s top donors gave money in exchange for access to the incoming Trump administration, policy concessions or to influence official administration positions."

Source:
WOULD HAVE CROSSED NATIONAL FORESTS
Federal Judges Nix Proposed Atlantic Pipeline
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a rare rebuke to energy companies in the Trump era, "a panel of federal judges has rejected permits for the Atlantic Coast natural gas pipeline to cross two national forests and the Appalachian trail in Virginia, finding that the national Forest Service 'abdicated its responsibility' and kowtowed to private industry in approving the project. The harshly worded, 60-page decision issued Thursday by three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is part of a string of legal setbacks for the 600-mile pipeline. The $7 billion project, being built by a consortium of companies led by Dominion Energy, is planned to carry natural gas from West Virginia, through Virginia and into North Carolina."

Source:
PINS KHASHOGGI KILLING ON MBS
Senate Moves to End Support for Saudi War
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
REP. POLIQUIN HAD CHALLENGED THE LAW
Federal Judge Upholds Ranked-Choice Voting in Maine
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A federal judge on Thursday rejected Republican U.S. Rep. Bruce Poliquin’s constitutional claims against ranked-choice voting and denied the incumbent’s request for a new election against Democratic Congressman-elect Jared Golden. U.S. District Court Judge Lance Walker ruled that, contrary to the arguments of Poliquin’s legal team, the U.S. Constitution does not require that whichever congressional candidates receives the most votes—or 'a plurality'—be declared the winner. Instead, Walker ruled the Constitution grants states broad discretion to run elections."

Source:
SAUDI ARABIA, ISRAEL, AND THE UAE
Mueller Probing Middle East Countries' Influence Campaigns
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Officials working under Special Counsel Robert Mueller are investigating Middle Eastern countries' attempts to influence American politics, and are set to release the findings in early 2019. "Various witnesses affiliated with the Trump campaign have been questioned about their conversations with deeply connected individuals from the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Israel ... Topics in those meetings ranged from the use of social-media manipulation to help install Trump in the White House to the overthrow of the regime in Iran." Investigators are also probing meetings organized by Lebanese-American businessman George Nader, and Joel Zamel, "a self-styled Mark Zuckerberg of the national-security world with deep ties to Israeli intelligence."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login