Obamacare’s Unlikely Winners

Dems hope these tales of success post-insurance cancellations will take the wind out of critics’ sails.

US President Barack Obama gives an address during South African former president Nelson Mandela's memorial service at the FNB Stadium (Soccer City) in Johannesburg on December 10, 2013.
National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
Lucia Graves
Dec. 17, 2013, 6:12 a.m.

Sue Spanke of Mis­soula, Mont., was highly dis­pleased this fall when she learned her health in­sur­ance had been can­celed.

“I got so mad that I went to my phone and star­ted call­ing all the polit­ic­al people and giv­ing them what for,” Spanke told The Billings Gaz­ette. That was be­fore she learned she was eli­gible for a policy at a much lower cost.

After an­grily call­ing her state aud­it­or’s of­fice, Spanke, a self-em­ployed artist in her 50s, found she was eli­gible for a fed­er­al sub­sidy. Her new in­sur­ance will cov­er her for a mere $30 to $40 a month with a de­duct­ible of only $500. She had been pay­ing $350 a month for a Blue Cross policy with a $5,000 de­duct­ible. “I went from a hor­rible policy that didn’t cov­er any­thing, that was break­ing me, to the best policy at the best price I’ve had since I was in my 20s,” she said.

With the web­site largely fixed, one of the last lines of at­tack against Obama­care is that the pres­id­ent lied when he said if people like their in­sur­ance plans, they can keep them. The White House is hop­ing stor­ies like Spanke’s will in­ocu­late them against those ar­gu­ments. And the pos­it­ive stor­ies abound.

An­oth­er man in­ter­viewed by The Billings Gaz­ette, Gary Mer­mel, said he re­ceived can­cel­la­tion no­tices for his fam­ily’s Blue Cross policies only to find later that he and his fam­ily were eli­gible for much more af­ford­able in­sur­ance. Mer­mel, a re­tired phys­i­cian with a preex­ist­ing health con­di­tion, had been pay­ing al­most $1,700 a month to cov­er his fam­ily, and last month Blue Cross in­formed him his rates would go up to nearly $2,100 a month for the re­mainder of the year. Un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act he was able to find in­sur­ance cov­er­ing his en­tire fam­ily for just $1,200 a month with com­par­able be­ne­fits and a lower de­duct­ible than he’d had pre­vi­ously.

He also won’t have to worry about be­ing denied cov­er­age or get­ting charged more for preex­ist­ing con­di­tions. “Be­fore, the in­sur­ance com­pan­ies had full con­trol,” he said. “They were al­lowed to place people at risk [of fin­an­cial ru­in] and they no longer can do that.”

Oth­er loc­al out­lets have doc­u­mented the suc­cess post-in­sur­ance can­cel­la­tion stor­ies as well.

In Lan­caster, Pa., Lori Lap­man, 58, learned her health plan was be­ing can­celed in Septem­ber — by Oc­to­ber things were look­ing up. Per The Sunday News: “Sit­ting at a laptop with a cer­ti­fied health law help­er, Lap­man went to Health­Care.gov, found it run­ning smoothly, and bought a sub­sid­ized High­mark plan that al­lows her to keep her doc­tors while sav­ing her money. Her can­celed plan cost her $520 a month. Her new cov­er­age? Only $111.73.”

In Har­ris­burg, Pa., The Pat­ri­ot News doc­u­mented the case of Lynn Keltz, one of the hun­dreds of thou­sands na­tion­wide who re­ceived a can­cel­la­tion no­tice. Keitz, who hap­pens to be one of the fed­er­ally fun­ded nav­ig­at­ors help­ing state res­id­ents find new cov­er­age un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act, said her new policy provides her bet­ter cov­er­age and costs $80 per month less.

In a let­ter to the ed­it­or in The Santa Maria Times, Al­lan Pacela told the story of how after his wife lost her in­sur­ance this fall, she found much bet­ter cov­er­age un­der Obama­care. The couple is now sav­ing $8,000 per year for a “much bet­ter plan.”

These stor­ies can be found in na­tion­al me­dia out­lets as well. The Huff­ing­ton Post re­layed the story of an HIV pa­tient from Michigan who, after learn­ing his old plan was can­celed, found a cheap­er plan un­der Obama­care with bet­ter cov­er­age (not to men­tion he got it with a preex­ist­ing con­di­tion). Mean­while, NPR told the story of 58-year-old Doug Norm­ing­ton, who, after re­ceiv­ing a can­cel­la­tion let­ter, found a plan that will cost him half what he had been pay­ing in premi­ums and a third the de­duct­ible. An­oth­er NPR story in­ter­viewed a num­ber of Cali­for­ni­ans who greeted their can­celed in­sur­ance policies with smiles. And The New York Times ran the story of Stephanie Lin­coln, who, with the help of a nav­ig­at­or signed up for cov­er­age cost­ing $113 a month with no de­duct­ible. The en­tire pro­cess took just one hour. “I am one of the people whose plans were can­celed,” she said. “It was just the easi­est thing in the world.”

No doubt there will be some Obama­care losers — most of them healthy, wealthy people who will have to pay a bit more. And there will be plenty of liber­tari­an crit­ics who will de­nounce the per­ceived pa­ter­nal­ism of the situ­ation. But there is no short­age of win­ners.

What We're Following See More »
PROBE CAME FROM INQUIRY INTO MANAFORT’S FINANCES
Mueller Investigating Tony Podesta and His Firm
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, three sources with knowledge of the matter told NBC News. The probe of Podesta and his Democratic-leaning lobbying firm grew out of Mueller's inquiry into the finances of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY
House Intel Will Interview Trump Digital Director
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump’s campaign digital director, Brad Parscale, will be interviewed Tuesday by the House Intelligence Committee, his first appearance before any of the panels examining the issue of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Mr. Parscale confirmed his scheduled appearance. The Senate committees also probing interference haven’t scheduled time with Mr. Parscale, he said, declining to comment further."

Source:
CONGRESS MAY HAVE DIFFERENT IDEAS
Trump Promises No Changes to 401(k) Plan
23 hours ago
THE LATEST
TRUMP’S ATTORNEY WAS SET TO TESTIFY ON WEDNESDAY
Senate Intel Postpones Testimony by Cohen
3 days ago
THE LATEST
AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE PREVENTED CONSIDERATION
Senate Rejects Effort to Nix SALT Tax Changes
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Senate Democrats on Thursday failed in their first attempt to save the state and local tax deduction, which helps many residents of California and other high-cost states reduce their federal income tax bills. The Republican-controlled Senate voted 52-47 to reject an amendment that would have prevented the Senate from considering any bill that repeals or limits the deduction as part of a planned tax overhaul."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login