Fed Watchers: Beware the Taper Worm

Following a big miss this September, analysts fear going too bold as they speculate on where the central bank will steer the economy next.

Yes, that's a seahorse, not a tapeworm, but did you really want to see a tapeworm?
National Journal
Catherine Hollander
Catherine Hollander
Dec. 18, 2013, midnight

It’s this week’s mult­i­bil­lion-dol­lar ques­tion: Is the Fed­er­al Re­serve about to ease off its all-out cam­paign to lower un­em­ploy­ment?

All year, Fed watch­ers have been won­der­ing when Fed Chair­man Ben Bernanke would shrink a ma­jor piece of his stim­u­lus plan: $85 bil­lion-a-month as­set pur­chases in­ten­ded to lower long-term in­terest rates and spur eco­nom­ic growth. The Fed has been hint­ing for months that it will be­gin scal­ing back — or “taper­ing” — the pro­gram.

And with a strong jobs re­port for Novem­ber, some ana­lysts are pre­dict­ing the time to taper has come. The Fed’s policy-set­ting com­mit­tee on Wed­nes­day will an­nounce its next moves on mon­et­ary policy.

Taper-watch is hardly new; ana­lysts have been spec­u­lat­ing about the pro­gram’s de­mise since shortly after it began. And after a big miss in Septem­ber, watch­ers are wary of catch­ing the “taper worm” — the creep­ing sense that the Fed will im­min­ently pull back on its stim­u­lus, des­pite the fact that the cent­ral bank has kept them guess­ing.

In Septem­ber, many watch­ers were con­vinced it was time to taper, think­ing the im­prov­ing eco­nom­ic data and stable in­fla­tion meant the Fed would be ready to slightly re­duce its monthly pur­chases. But they got it wrong: The Fed stood pat, and left its $85 bil­lion pro­gram un­changed.

“People were burned by the non-taper in Septem­ber, so they’re hes­it­ant “¦ to think it’s Decem­ber,” said Joseph La­Vor­gna, chief U.S. eco­nom­ist at Deutsche Bank. La­Vor­gna be­lieves the Fed will de­cide to be­gin cut­ting its pur­chases by $10 bil­lion Treas­ury bonds a month. The Fed is also buy­ing mort­gage-backed se­cur­it­ies as part of the pro­gram, which is col­lect­ively known as quant­it­at­ive eas­ing. 

Eco­nom­ists at Gold­man Sachs, in con­trast, think the cent­ral bank is most likely to wait un­til spring. “We cur­rently ex­pect taper­ing to be­gin at the March 2014 [Fed] meet­ing, al­though a Janu­ary move is very pos­sible. We can’t even rule out a small move this week,” they said in a re­search note.

So fore­casts are mixed this time around, and it’s not just be­cause those who were wrong last time worry they’ll miss the mark again. The eco­nom­ic evid­ence is also mixed. The bond-buy­ing pro­gram was sup­posed to help the Fed achieve its con­gres­sion­ally set “dual man­date” of price sta­bil­ity and max­im­um em­ploy­ment. Lately, gross do­mest­ic product and jobs data have bested eco­nom­ists’ ex­pect­a­tions, but in­fla­tion is still run­ning be­low the Fed’s 2 per­cent tar­get.

“We think the im­prove­ment in the in­com­ing data has been suf­fi­cient just about to war­rant the taper now, but I think most people would say that this is pretty much a toss-up,” said Paul Ash­worth, chief North Amer­ic­an eco­nom­ist at mac­roe­co­nom­ics re­search firm Cap­it­al Eco­nom­ics.

“There are just times when Fed of­fi­cials go in­to [a policy-set­ting] meet­ing and there isn’t ne­ces­sar­ily a clear out­come in sight, and they prob­ably do have to sit down and dis­cuss it and come to a con­clu­sion and that de­bate could go either way, and I think this is one of those times,” he said.

Lay­er­ing onto the dif­fi­culty of fore­cast­ing the end of the pro­gram is that it’s the first ever open-ended bond-buy­ing pro­gram the cent­ral bank has ever con­duc­ted, so eco­nom­ists have no pre­vi­ous ex­per­i­ence to draw upon. Two pre­vi­ous rounds of quant­it­at­ive eas­ing were dis­crete pro­grams with a clear end date. The Fed said it would keep the latest up un­til there is “sub­stan­tial” im­prove­ment in the labor force, something it has de­lib­er­ately neg­lected to define in keep­ing with the open-ended nature of the pro­gram.

Many eco­nom­ists who do be­lieve the Fed will be­gin to taper this week say the first move is likely to be small, in the realm of a $10 bil­lion monthly cut, and that the cent­ral bank may try to off­set its de­cision by pledging to keep its bench­mark in­terest rate near zero for longer. Like the as­set-pur­chase pro­gram, the goal of keep­ing the fed­er­al funds rate low is to en­cour­age eco­nom­ic growth. The longer the Fed pledges to keep the rate low — a com­mit­ment known as “for­ward guid­ance” — the more likely busi­nesses and house­holds are to make the bor­row­ing and in­vest­ment de­cisions the Fed is hop­ing will bring the eco­nomy back to its pre-crisis strength. Most re­cently, the Fed has said it will keep the fed­er­al funds rate near zero un­til un­em­ploy­ment hits 6.5 per­cent (it was 7 per­cent in Novem­ber).

Wheth­er the Fed de­cides to get the ball rolling on the taper or to wait un­til next year, mar­kets may shrug. “I don’t think we’re go­ing to get an aw­ful lot of move­ment from mar­kets either way,” said Ash­worth, who says they’ve prob­ably halfway priced in the Fed’s de­cision.

And if the Fed de­cides not to pull back this week, the taper worm will be back soon. The next Fed policy meet­ing is sched­uled for Jan. 28-29, just days be­fore Bernanke’s term ex­pires.

What We're Following See More »
PROCEDURES NOT FOLLOWED
Trump Not on Ballot in Minnesota
3 days ago
THE LATEST
MOB RULE?
Trump on Immigration: ‘I Don’t Know, You Tell Me’
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Perhaps Donald Trump can take a plebiscite to solve this whole messy immigration thing. At a Fox News town hall with Sean Hannity last night, Trump essentially admitted he's "stumped," turning to the audience and asking: “Can we go through a process or do you think they have to get out? Tell me, I mean, I don’t know, you tell me.”

Source:
BIG CHANGE FROM WHEN HE SELF-FINANCED
Trump Enriching His Businesses with Donor Money
5 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "nearly quintupled the monthly rent his presidential campaign pays for its headquarters at Trump Tower to $169,758 in July, when he was raising funds from donors, compared with March, when he was self-funding his campaign." A campaign spokesman "said the increased office space was needed to accommodate an anticipated increase in employees," but the campaign's paid staff has actually dipped by about 25 since March. The campaign has also paid his golf courses and restaurants about $260,000 since mid-May.

Source:
QUESTIONS OVER IMMIGRATION POLICY
Trump Cancels Rallies
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Donald Trump probably isn't taking seriously John Oliver's suggestion that he quit the race. But he has canceled or rescheduled rallies amid questions over his stance on immigration. Trump rescheduled a speech on the topic that he was set to give later this week. Plus, he's also nixed planned rallies in Oregon and Las Vegas this month.

Source:
‘STRATEGY AND MESSAGING’
Sean Hannity Is Also Advising Trump
6 days ago
THE LATEST

Donald Trump's Fox News brain trust keeps growing. After it was revealed that former Fox chief Roger Ailes is informally advising Trump on debate preparation, host Sean Hannity admitted over the weekend that he's also advising Trump on "strategy and messaging." He told the New York Times: “I’m not hiding the fact that I want Donald Trump to be the next president of the United States. I never claimed to be a journalist.”

Source:
×