Sports Blackouts Could Be Gone by Next Year’s First Kickoff

The FCC might change its broadcasting rules to keep games on the air — even when they’re sparsely attended.

These fans endured a whiteout, but their counterparts at home may not have to deal with blackouts much longer.
National Journal
Alex Brown
Add to Briefcase
Alex Brown
Dec. 18, 2013, 11:22 a.m.

Take heart, Char­gers fans (wherever you are). By next year, the NFL may no longer be able to pre­vent you from watch­ing your team’s games — even if Qual­comm Sta­di­um is full of empty seats.

The Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion an­nounced Wed­nes­day it is pro­pos­ing to roll back rules that keep pay TV pro­viders from show­ing games that are blacked out on loc­al sta­tions. Cur­rently, the NFL keeps games off of loc­al air­waves if less than 85 per­cent of tick­ets are sold. It’s helped out by the FCC, which pre­vents cable and satel­lite pro­viders from bring­ing blacked-out view­ers their game if the loc­al net­work is barred from show­ing it.

But that could be about to change. The ra­tionale be­hind the rule — teams’ re­li­ance on tick­et sales as a rev­en­ue source — is out­dated, FCC says. A 1975 find­ing from the agency pos­ited that an im­por­ted sig­nal of a loc­al game could cause gate re­ceipts to plum­met. Black­out-free broad­casts, the think­ing went, would cause teams to stop selling air­ing rights to their games, for­cing fans to at­tend in per­son. But in­creas­ing rev­en­ues from broad­cast rights — The Los Angeles Dodgers just earned $7 bil­lion for a deal with Time Warner Cable — make such a scen­ario un­likely.

“Changes in the mar­ket­place raised ques­tions about wheth­er these rules are still in the pub­lic in­terest, par­tic­u­larly at a time when high tick­et prices and the eco­nomy make it dif­fi­cult for many sports fans to at­tend games,” said an FCC of­fi­cial. The agency’s re­port singled out the NFL — the source of most blacked-out games — and noted its climb­ing broad­cast profits. “[T]he im­port­ance of gate re­ceipts has di­min­ished dra­mat­ic­ally for NFL clubs in the past four dec­ades, par­tic­u­larly in re­la­tion to tele­vi­sion rev­en­ues,” it stated.

Sev­er­al groups quickly voiced sup­port. “Elim­in­at­ing these rules is a small, but im­port­ant step,” said Pub­lic Know­ledge at­tor­ney John Bergmay­er. “[T]he FCC should not be in the busi­ness of put­ting its thumb on the scales in a way that harms view­ers.”

But al­low­ing cable sub­scribers a black­out work-around not offered to over-the-air view­ers isn’t fair, says one broad­casters’ group. “We’re con­cerned that the FCC pro­pos­al may hasten the mi­gra­tion of sports to pay-TV plat­forms,” said the Na­tion­al As­so­ci­ation of Broad­casters’ Den­nis Whar­ton. “Al­low­ing im­port­a­tion of sports pro­gram­ming on pay-TV plat­forms while deny­ing that same pro­gram­ming to free broad­cast-only homes would erode the eco­nom­ic base of loc­al tele­vi­sion.”

The pro­posed change will first go through a 30-day pub­lic com­ment peri­od, fol­lowed by an­oth­er 60-day peri­od for replies. After a re­view, the pro­pos­al would then have to earn the sup­port of a ma­jor­ity of com­mis­sion­ers be­fore tak­ing ef­fect.

Sens. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., and Richard Blu­menth­al, D-Ct., pro­posed le­gis­la­tion in Novem­ber to lim­it black­outs. Mc­Cain took to Twit­ter to praise FCC’s pro­pos­al.

What We're Following See More »
INDICTMENTS NOT PROOF OF COLLUSION
Rosenstein Holds Presser On Russian Indictments
3 days ago
THE DETAILS
Source:
CONTRADICTS TRUMP’S DENIALS
U.S. Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Interference
3 days ago
THE LATEST

The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."

Source:
“QUEEN FOR A DAY”
Gates Said to Be Finalizing a Plea Deal
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."

Source:
ZERO-FOR-TWO
Another Defeat for Immigration Legislation in the Senate
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "

Source:
DISPUTE ASSERTION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
House Intel Panel Could Charge Bannon with Contempt
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login