Want to Control a 17-Year-Old’s Decisions? Now’s Your Chance!

A group of shareholders is voting to decide whether to take command of a young man’s life.

This is what 17 year olds look like, according to stock photography.
National Journal
Matt Berman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
Dec. 19, 2013, 10:42 a.m.

Mike Mer­rill is a pub­licly traded per­son. Since his IPO in 2008, most of Mer­rill’s ma­jor life de­cisions have been run by a board of share­hold­ers — from whom he can date to what kind of hair he can grow on his face. Now, Mer­rill would like to bring his share­hold­ers to a 17-year-old named Jack­son Gari­ety.

This may sound com­pletely crazy, but be­fore you de­cry the state of our poor dysto­pi­an world, con­sider this: Wer­en’t we all kind of, if we’re be­ing gen­er­ous, idi­ots at age 17? Maybe what we could’ve used, aside from an oc­ca­sion­al kick in the shins, is semi-bind­ing ad­vice from a large group of people with a stake in our fu­ture.

Just look at what’s happened to Mike Mer­rill. The reas­on he’s now try­ing to push his share­hold­ers’ de­cisions onto a new per­son is be­cause he’s been too busy since his board voted for him to quit his job and start his own com­pany this past March. The job change, which only one share­hold­er voted against, was a “huge boost of con­fid­ence,” Mer­rill told Na­tion­al Journ­al this fall. It’s the kind of con­fid­ence that could, the­or­et­ic­ally at least, be be­ne­fi­cial for a freshly min­ted adult.

Jack­son Gari­ety, like Mer­rill, wouldn’t be leg­ally re­quired to do any­thing Mer­rill’s share­hold­ers voted for. So don’t ex­pect a mor­al di­lemma if share­hold­ers ask Gari­ety to kill. As Mer­rill put it to NJ this fall, he is only be­hold­en to his share­hold­ers as much as he wants his share price to be high. And, pre­sum­ably, if he were to re­fuse to obey an or­der from his board, prices would col­lapse. So it’s in the best in­terest of every­one to make de­cisions that would ac­tu­ally be the most be­ne­fi­cial to Mer­rill’s, or Gari­ety’s, life.

Of course, a lot of what a group of share­hold­ers here would be do­ing for Gari­ety is tak­ing the ad­vis­ory role of a group of friends. Mer­rill’s rule for ques­tions he’d put to share­hold­ers is ba­sic­ally, “Any­thing I would nor­mally ask my friends for ad­vice for, I’d go to the share­hold­ers and ask ques­tions there.”

The dif­fer­ence is, un­less he wants his mar­ket to tank, he has to take his share­hold­ers’ ad­vice. It helps to make tough de­cisions a little bit sim­pler. For a 17-year-old, that could be just the right thing.

What We're Following See More »
SAYS TRUMP JUST ATTACKING REPUBLICANS
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
2 days ago
THE LATEST
“YOU CAN’T CHANGE HISTORY, BUT YOU CAN LEARN FROM IT”
Trump Defends Confederate Statues in Tweetstorm
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE
CEOS HAVE BEEN FLEEING FOR THE EXITS
Trump to End Business Councils
3 days ago
THE LATEST
FROM STATEMENT
McConnell: “No Good Neo-Nazis”
3 days ago
THE LATEST
NO FORMAL LEGISLATIVE EFFORT
CBC Members Call for Removal of Confederate Statues from Capitol
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Members of the Congressional Black Caucus are reviving calls to remove Confederate statues from the Capitol following the violence at a white nationalist rally in Virginia." Rep. Cedric Richmond, the group's chair, told ABC News that "we will never solve America's race problem if we continue to honor traitors who fought against the United States." And Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson said, “Confederate memorabilia have no place in this country and especially not in the United States Capitol." But a CBC spokesperson said no formal legislative effort is afoot.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login