U.S. senators on Thursday introduced a bill threatening new sanctions on Iran, despite White House warnings that the legislation could disrupt nuclear talks.
The measure allows for a 180-day suspension of sanctions to facilitate diplomacy, plus additional time if the White House judges a final deal to be imminent. The legislation also includes a “sense of Congress” that the “government of Iran does not have an absolute or inherent right to enrichment and reprocessing capabilities and technologies,” despite Tehran’s past statements that it does maintain such a right under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), who sponsored the Nuclear Weapon-Free Iran Act with 23 of his colleagues, argued that the measure would raise pressure on Iran to fully relinquish atomic activities that could support a future capacity to produce nuclear weapons.
Iran insists that its nuclear program is peaceful, and has warned that any new sanctions would threaten an initial multilateral agreement reached last month on the nation’s atomic efforts. The Obama administration hopes the November deal will help negotiators hammer out longer-term restrictions on the disputed Iranian nuclear activities.
“Current sanctions brought Iran to the negotiating table and a credible threat of future sanctions will require Iran to cooperate and act in good faith at the negotiating table,” Menendez said in released remarks. “[Additional] sanctions will influence Iran’s calculus and accelerate that process toward achieving a meaningful diplomatic resolution.”
White House spokesman Jay Carney on Tuesday cautioned lawmakers against taking any immediate action to pass new sanctions legislation.
“If they were to impose or pass new sanctions now,” the move could “potentially scuttle the initial preliminary agreement,” Carney said.
This article was published in Global Security Newswire, which is produced independently by National Journal Group under contract with the Nuclear Threat Initiative. NTI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan group working to reduce global threats from nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.
What We're Following See More »
Just a day after Donald Trump called her a bigot, Hillary Clinton delivered a scathing speech tying Trump to the KKK and so-called “alt-right.” This new frontier of debate between the two candidates has emerged at a time when Trump has been seeking to appeal to minority voters, among whom he has struggled to garner support. Calling him “profoundly dangerous,” Clinton didn’t hold back on her criticisms of Trump. “He is taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party,” Clinton said.
Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 51%-41% in a new Quinnipiac poll released today. Her lead shrinks to seven points when the third-party candidates are included. In that scenario, she leads 45%-38%, with Gary Johnson pulling 10% and Jill Stein at 4%.
Is the Clinton family backtracking on some of its promises to insulate the White House from the Clinton Foundation? Opposition researchers will certainly try to portray it that way. A foundation spokesman said yesterday that Chelsea Clinton will stay on its board, and that the "foundation’s largest project, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, might continue to accept foreign government and corporate funding."
Perhaps Donald Trump can take a plebiscite to solve this whole messy immigration thing. At a Fox News town hall with Sean Hannity last night, Trump essentially admitted he's "stumped," turning to the audience and asking: “Can we go through a process or do you think they have to get out? Tell me, I mean, I don’t know, you tell me.”