Senators Introduce Bipartisan Iran-Sanctions Bill

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), shown in September, on Thursday joined 23 other senators in introducing legislation that would threaten new sanctions against Iran.
National Journal
Diane Barnes
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Diane Barnes
Dec. 19, 2013, 10:02 a.m.

U.S. sen­at­ors on Thursday in­tro­duced a bill threat­en­ing new sanc­tions on Ir­an, des­pite White House warn­ings that the le­gis­la­tion could dis­rupt nuc­le­ar talks.

The meas­ure al­lows for a 180-day sus­pen­sion of sanc­tions to fa­cil­it­ate dip­lomacy, plus ad­di­tion­al time if the White House judges a fi­nal deal to be im­min­ent. The le­gis­la­tion also in­cludes a “sense of Con­gress” that the “gov­ern­ment of Ir­an does not have an ab­so­lute or in­her­ent right to en­rich­ment and re­pro­cessing cap­ab­il­it­ies and tech­no­lo­gies,” des­pite Tehran’s past state­ments that it does main­tain such a right un­der the Nuc­le­ar Non­pro­lif­er­a­tion Treaty

Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee Chair­man Robert Men­en­dez (D-N.J.), who sponsored the Nuc­le­ar Weapon-Free Ir­an Act with 23 of his col­leagues, ar­gued that the meas­ure would raise pres­sure on Ir­an to fully re­lin­quish atom­ic activ­it­ies that could sup­port a fu­ture ca­pa­city to pro­duce nuc­le­ar weapons.

Ir­an in­sists that its nuc­le­ar pro­gram is peace­ful, and has warned that any new sanc­tions would threaten an ini­tial mul­ti­lat­er­al agree­ment reached last month on the na­tion’s atom­ic ef­forts. The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion hopes the Novem­ber deal will help ne­go­ti­at­ors ham­mer out longer-term re­stric­tions on the dis­puted Ir­a­ni­an nuc­le­ar activ­it­ies.

“Cur­rent sanc­tions brought Ir­an to the ne­go­ti­at­ing table and a cred­ible threat of fu­ture sanc­tions will re­quire Ir­an to co­oper­ate and act in good faith at the ne­go­ti­at­ing table,” Men­en­dez said in re­leased re­marks. “[Ad­di­tion­al] sanc­tions will in­flu­ence Ir­an’s cal­cu­lus and ac­cel­er­ate that pro­cess to­ward achiev­ing a mean­ing­ful dip­lo­mat­ic res­ol­u­tion.”

White House spokes­man Jay Car­ney on Tues­day cau­tioned law­makers against tak­ing any im­me­di­ate ac­tion to pass new sanc­tions le­gis­la­tion.

“If they were to im­pose or pass new sanc­tions now,” the move could “po­ten­tially scuttle the ini­tial pre­lim­in­ary agree­ment,” Car­ney said.

This art­icle was pub­lished in Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire, which is pro­duced in­de­pend­ently by Na­tion­al Journ­al Group un­der con­tract with the Nuc­le­ar Threat Ini­ti­at­ive. NTI is a non­profit, non­par­tis­an group work­ing to re­duce glob­al threats from nuc­le­ar, bio­lo­gic­al, and chem­ic­al weapons.

What We're Following See More »
DIAGNOSED WITH BRAIN CANCER LAST WEEK
McCain Returning for Health Care Vote
4 hours ago
THE LATEST
BUT IS HE A YES VOTE?
Cornyn Attempting to Get McCain Back for Health Vote
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
“TIME HAD RUN OUT” FOR ILL BABY
Charlie Gard’s Parents End Legal Fight
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.

Source:
AGENCY SOUGHT TO DELAY IMPLEMENTATION
11 States Sue EPA Over Chemical Rule
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.

Source:
ULTIMATUM ON ACA
Trump: You’re With Us Or Against Us
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login