The United Nations declared online privacy a worldwide human right this week, a finger wag at the U.S. government’s surveillance program.
The U.N. General Assembly voted unanimously Thursday on a resolution urging the 193 member states to reel in their data-collection efforts and step up independent oversight and transparency for these program, reports the Los Angeles Times.
The resolution also calls on U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay to submit a report on the state of digital privacy to the UNHCR and General Assembly. The resolution “affirms that the same rights that people have offline must also be protected online, including the right to privacy.” It does not specifically mention the U.S., but the unanimous vote reflects growing international fears over individual privacy spurred by the the ongoing revelations about the U.S. digital-spying program.
Pillay praised whistle-blowers, specifically Edward Snowden, for their role in protecting human rights earlier this year.
“The right to privacy, the right to access to information, and freedom of expression are closely linked,” Pillay said in defense of whistleblowers. “The public has the democratic right to take part in the public affairs, and this right cannot be effectively exercised by solely relying on authorized information.”
Many nations have condemned the NSA surveillance program independently, but this is the first united, international response to the widespread data collection. Although the U.N.’s vote is not enforceable, its is a referendum on international public opinion.
The resolution was drawn up by two nations whose leaders were the most visible victims of the NSA’s spying program: Germany and Brazil. Snowden recently asked Brazil to grant him asylum in exchange for his assistance in investigating U.S. surveillance of Brazilian citizens.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation called the vote a “giant leap against surveillance.”
What We're Following See More »
"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."
Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."
NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.
"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."
In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shunning traditional debate preparations, but has been watching video of…Clinton’s best and worst debate moments, looking for her vulnerabilities.” Trump “has paid only cursory attention to briefing materials. He has refused to use lecterns in mock debate sessions despite the urging of his advisers. He prefers spitballing ideas with his team rather than honing them into crisp, two-minute answers.”