The United Nations declared online privacy a worldwide human right this week, a finger wag at the U.S. government’s surveillance program.
The U.N. General Assembly voted unanimously Thursday on a resolution urging the 193 member states to reel in their data-collection efforts and step up independent oversight and transparency for these program, reports the Los Angeles Times.
The resolution also calls on U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay to submit a report on the state of digital privacy to the UNHCR and General Assembly. The resolution “affirms that the same rights that people have offline must also be protected online, including the right to privacy.” It does not specifically mention the U.S., but the unanimous vote reflects growing international fears over individual privacy spurred by the the ongoing revelations about the U.S. digital-spying program.
Pillay praised whistle-blowers, specifically Edward Snowden, for their role in protecting human rights earlier this year.
“The right to privacy, the right to access to information, and freedom of expression are closely linked,” Pillay said in defense of whistleblowers. “The public has the democratic right to take part in the public affairs, and this right cannot be effectively exercised by solely relying on authorized information.”
Many nations have condemned the NSA surveillance program independently, but this is the first united, international response to the widespread data collection. Although the U.N.’s vote is not enforceable, its is a referendum on international public opinion.
The resolution was drawn up by two nations whose leaders were the most visible victims of the NSA’s spying program: Germany and Brazil. Snowden recently asked Brazil to grant him asylum in exchange for his assistance in investigating U.S. surveillance of Brazilian citizens.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation called the vote a “giant leap against surveillance.”
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.