A future Iran nuclear accord could automatically reinstate international sanctions if Tehran violates its provisions, says a senior White House official.
“We will not construct a deal or accept a deal in which we cannot verify exactly what [the Iranians] are doing,” Reuters quoted U.S. national security adviser Susan Rice as saying on the CBS news program “60 Minutes.”
Washington and its allies hope a six-month nuclear agreement reached last month will lay the groundwork to negotiate more enduring restrictions on Iran’s arms-relevant nuclear activities. Fears of Iranian backpedaling, though, have contributed to a congressional push for new sanctions that the White House sees as a threat to diplomacy.
Rice said that if international authorities catch the Iranians violating a future deal, “we will ensure that the pressure is reimposed on them.”
Washington and its partners still have not developed language that would automatically renew sanctions under such conditions, “but this is something that’s quite doable,” she said in an interview aired on Sunday.
Rice said it remains uncertain if existing economic pressure is sufficient for Iran to accept a “verifiable” means of ensuring that it could never build a nuclear weapon so quickly that it couldn’t be stopped.
Her remarks echoed comments made by President Obama during a Friday press briefing.
“There is no need for new sanctions legislation — not yet,” Agence France-Presse quoted Obama as saying. “If Iran comes back and says, we can’t give you assurances that we’re not going to weaponize “¦ it’s not going to be hard for us to turn the dials back [and] strengthen sanctions even further.”
On Sunday, Iran and the five permanent U.N. Security Council member nations and Germany paused their talks for the Christmas holiday, with a European Union spokesperson saying discussions would likely resume before the New Year, according to a separate Reuters report. The international envoys are engaging on how to implement last month’s deal. The interim accord grants Iran limited relief from punitive economic measures, but Tehran wants the “P-5+1” nations to offer additional sanctions curbs under a future agreement.
The Persian Gulf power insists that its atomic activities are peaceful, but that assertion faces strong international skepticism.
What We're Following See More »
"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."
Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.
If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."
On Tuesday, President Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines threatened to kick U.S. troops out of the country, adding that if he remains president for more than one term he will move to terminate all military deals with America. Last week, Duterte called for a separation between the two countries, though other government officials immediately said he did not mean that literally.