He may be imaginary, but Santa Claus is very real to many Americans. And this year, he became real enough to experience a bit of an identity crisis.
The debate over who Santa really is — or who he should be — began in earnest early this month, when Aisha Harris, writing for Slate, suggested we abandon the current visage and replace it with a penguin to “spare millions of nonwhite kids the insecurity and shame that I remember from childhood.”
Conservative media shot back. “For all the kids watching at home, Santa just is white but this person is just arguing that maybe we should also have a black Santa,” Megyn Kelly told Fox viewers. Then politicians jumped in. “Maybe, you know, he’s Jewish,” Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., joked on NPR’s Morning Edition. In the middle of all this, alternative-energy companies began pushing for a slim Santa in a green coat who rejects big consumer brands in favor of gifts that give back.
But Santas who deviate from the norm already exist. In parts of the country with large minority populations, the Santas adorning Christmas cards and greeting children at the mall are not white, “illustrating that in an increasingly diverse United States, Santa takes on whatever color you imagine him to be,” the Associated Press wrote on Friday.
Still, even a change in coat color, just like a change in ethnicity or species, will immediately see push-back. A red coat, a blushing white face — “these are very very traditional, iconic images,” says Jenna Allard, director of operations at Pear Energy, which is promoting a green-coat Claus through holiday sales on wind or solar electricity for households. “Occasionally, we kind of need to step back and think about the meanings behind them and what we want to save and what we don’t.”
So who is that man from the North Pole? The 21st-century Santa Claus is a blend of Sinterklaas, a cape-wearing, staff-toting Dutch saint; Father Christmas, a cheerful, long-bearded gentleman from British folklore; and St. Nicholas, a generous Greek bishop from modern-day Turkey once persecuted for his Christian beliefs.
However, Santa as most Americans know him — with rosy cheeks, a hearty ho-ho, and big belly — comes from a successful marketing campaign barely a century old.
In the 1920s, the Coca-Cola Co. launched a series of shopping ads during Christmastime featuring Santa. He looked the way cartoonist Thomas Nast drew him for Harper’s Weekly in 1862: a small, elf-like figure with a strict facial expression.
In 1931, ad executives working with Coke wanted the campaign “to show a wholesome Santa who was both realistic and symbolic,” according to the soda company’s website. The illustrator commissioned for the job, Haddon Sundblom, used a friend, a retired salesman, as a live model, and drew inspiration from Clement Clark Moore’s 1822 poem “A Visit From St. Nicholas” to create the “warm, friendly, pleasantly plump and human Santa” we see most often today.
“People loved the Coca-Cola Santa images and paid such close attention to them that when anything changed, they sent letters to The Coca-Cola Company,” reads a history of the campaign.
The modern-day image of Santa Claus predates the people who have postulated his “true” identity this year. The war between those who say we should rewrite history to make it reflect modern sensibilities and those who want to leave it untouched is far from over. There seems to be only one real winner, though, and that’s Coke.
- 1 Live from New York, It’s Joe Piscopo’s Pseudo-Campaign for N.J. Governor
- 2 From the Editor
- 3 African-Americans With College Degrees Are Twice As Likely to Be Unemployed as Other Graduates
- 4 How the Government Pays Defense Contractors Tens of Billions for Nothing
- 5 GOP Proposal Could Undermine Obamacare’s Weakest Exchanges
What We're Following See More »
"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."
The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.
The Washington, D.C. area will undergo "a full-scale exercise" Wednesday morning "designed to prepare for the possibility of a complex coordinated terror attack in the National Capital Region." The drill will take place at six different sites throughout the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia. The drill should not be taken as a sign that emergency services are expecting an attack, said Scott Boggs, Managing Director of Homeland Security and Public Safety at the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
The Presidential Inaugural Committee "acknowledged late Monday that a final report it filed with the Federal Election Commission this month was riddled with errors, many of which were first identified through a crowdsourced data project at HuffPost." The committee raised about $100 million for the festivities, but the 500-page FEC report, which detailed where that money came from, was riddled with problems. The likely culprit: a system of access codes sent out by the GOP's ticketing system. Those codes were then often passed around on the secondary market.