Why Hawaii Democrats Aren’t United This Holiday Season

The Aloha State is home to competitive primaries for Senate and governor.

Governor-elect Neil Abercrombie (2nd L) of Hawaii speaks alongside fellow Governor-elects Dan Malloy (L) of Connecticut, Lincoln Chafee (R) of Rhode Island, Peter Shumlin (2nd R) of Vermont and , speak to the media outside of the West Wing of the White House in Washington, DC, December 2, 2010.
National Journal
Karyn Bruggeman
Add to Briefcase
Karyn Bruggeman
Dec. 23, 2013, 12:20 p.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama is end­ing 2013 in Hawaii, but the new year could bring tu­mult to the Demo­crat­ic Party in the Aloha State. Both the gov­ernor — and the sen­at­or he ap­poin­ted last year — face cred­ible primary chal­lenges that could help shape the dir­ec­tion of the state party for years to come.

Al­most a year ago, Gov. Neil Aber­crom­bie, seek­ing to lead Demo­crats in­to a new era after the state lost more than 71 years of Sen­ate ten­ure in the course of two weeks, ap­poin­ted Lt. Gov. Bri­an Schatz to fill the seat of the late Sen. Daniel In­ouye. Now, Aber­crom­bie and Schatz are fa­cing spir­ited primar­ies, with the lat­ter be­ing chal­lenged by the wo­man In­ouye wanted to suc­ceed him.

In a memo re­leased in Oc­to­ber, Schatz’s cam­paign boldly pro­claimed that he has “as­sembled an im­press­ive team run­ning an ef­fect­ive, mod­ern, and win­ning cam­paign,” and his primary op­pon­ent, Rep. Colleen Hanabusa, “lacks the mod­ern polit­ic­al and com­mu­nic­a­tions in­fra­struc­ture to wage a suc­cess­ful Sen­ate cam­paign.” Team Schatz based his claims on the money, en­dorse­ments, and con­sult­ants he has in his corner and on the grounds that he is the most pro­gress­ive can­did­ate in the race with a vot­ing re­cord to show for it.

But Hanabusa has re­mained with­in the mar­gin of er­ror against Schatz in every poll con­duc­ted so far on the Demo­crat­ic primary, un­der­min­ing his pos­tur­ing as the in­ev­it­able win­ner. The most re­cent poll on the race, an auto­mated sur­vey con­duc­ted in Oc­to­ber for the web­site Hon­olulu Civil Beat, showed Schatz stat­ist­ic­ally tied with Hanabusa, 38 per­cent to 36 per­cent, with a big chunk of voters re­main­ing un­de­cided.

Schatz’s memo catered to pun­dits who pay close at­ten­tion to con­sult­ants and en­dorse­ments, but if all polit­ics is loc­al, nowhere is that more true than in Hawaii. The is­lands are dis­tant from the U.S. in time, space, and cul­tur­al iden­tity, and it’s a place where con­ven­tion­al cam­paign wis­dom doesn’t ne­ces­sar­ily hold true.

Hanabusa, who has fallen be­hind Schatz in terms of en­dorse­ments and money, feels the race will be won the same way she won her first House race in 2010, through grass­roots field­work and get­ting voters out to the polls. “What I really be­lieve made a dif­fer­ent in that race is the field game,” Hanabusa said, be­cause “a lot of polit­ics in Hawaii is re­la­tion­al; it’s about years and years of build­ing trust.”

When asked why she would launch a primary chal­lenge to a sit­ting sen­at­or in a safe Demo­crat­ic seat, Hanabusa said her de­cision was “not made eas­ily” and offered an an­ec­dote to ex­plain. “I was in line at the bank and this gen­tle­man came up to me and told me, ‘You’ve really done a lot. Is it be­cause you’ve been around so long?’ and I re­spon­ded, ‘No, I’ve been around for the same time as Sen­at­or Schatz.’ “

Hanabusa and Schatz were both elec­ted to the state Le­gis­lature for the first time in 1998, but Hanabusa says her re­cord of achieve­ment dur­ing her time in of­fice is “what people are go­ing to look at.” “That’s why I ar­rived at this de­cision.”

In the Oc­to­ber memo, Schatz’s camp ex­pressed con­fid­ence that the race would be won on ideo­logy, not ex­per­i­ence, and most cer­tainly not race. But the di­vid­ing lines are tough to ig­nore. Hawaii is ma­jor­ity minor­ity, and U.S. census re­dis­trict­ing data show that whites make up just 27 per­cent of those over age 18 who are eli­gible to vote in the state. Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans, Asi­an-Pa­cific is­landers, Nat­ive Hawaii­ans, mixed race res­id­ents, and oth­er demo­graph­ic groups ac­count for the oth­er 73 per­cent.

In the Oc­to­ber Civil Beat poll, Schatz led among white voters 55 per­cent to 28 per­cent, and among Filipino voters, who rep­res­ent a grow­ing and in­creas­ingly im­port­ant demo­graph­ic in the state, al­though more Filipi­nos (47 per­cent) re­mained un­de­cided than any oth­er eth­nic group. Hanabusa, who is of Ja­pan­ese-Amer­ic­an des­cent, held sig­ni­fic­ant leads among Ja­pan­ese, Chinese, and Nat­ive Hawaii­an voters.

But ob­serv­ers have reas­on to be cau­tious about polling in Hawaii. Mike Ger­hke, a vice pres­id­ent at Ben­en­son Strategy Group, which has polled for Hanabusa since she first ran for Con­gress, says polling there is com­plic­ated by tech­nic­al and cul­tur­al idio­syn­crasies unique to the is­lands. Ger­hke says it’s not un­com­mon to en­counter Asi­an voters, par­tic­u­larly older ones, who “don’t want to say who they voted for.” He says they will talk about is­sues, but may say “they don’t know” or give false in­form­a­tion when asked about votes cast or favored can­did­ates be­cause cul­tur­al norms dir­ect them away from such top­ics. Ger­hke’s ex­per­i­ence has shown that auto­mated calls can also skew res­ults be­cause is­sues with ac­cents and pro­nun­ci­ation.

Be­cause the state simply hasn’t had all that many com­pet­it­ive elec­tions, Ger­hke also points out that the Hawaii Demo­crat­ic Party’s voter file is in “ter­rible shape.” The age of many older voters is miss­ing, so “you’d like to be able to know that you can weight by age, but can’t al­ways trust that when work­ing in Hawaii.” The file also only in­cludes phone num­bers for roughly 40 per­cent of re­gistered voters, mak­ing polling and voter con­tact work by cam­paigns more cum­ber­some than usu­al.

On top of com­pet­ing with each oth­er for votes, the two can­did­ates will also be bat­tling these real­it­ies and a strong case of voter apathy which has plagued the state for dec­ades. Hawaii con­sist­ently has the low­est voter turnout rate in the coun­try, fueled by the fact that al­most a third of those who are eli­gible to vote aren’t re­gistered. In 2008, a ban­ner year for Demo­crat­ic turnout na­tion­wide, just 48.8 per­cent of Hawaii’s vot­ing eli­gible pop­u­la­tion showed up at the polls when Obama, the state’s kama’aina, or nat­ive son, was on the bal­lot. In the com­pet­it­ive Demo­crat­ic Sen­ate primary between Mazie Hirono and Ed Case in Au­gust 2012, just over 233,000 bal­lots were cast, rep­res­ent­ing only one in five eli­gible voters.

Low voter par­ti­cip­a­tion may be at­trib­ut­able in part to Nat­ive Hawaii­an and Hawaii res­id­ents’ weak iden­ti­fic­a­tion with state and fed­er­al gov­ern­ments es­tab­lished just a few dec­ades ago. Hawaii only be­came a state in 1959, two years be­fore Obama was born, and move­ments call­ing for Nat­ive Hawaii­an sov­er­eignty still gath­er a sur­pris­ing amount of sup­port. In a poll con­duc­ted by the Hon­olulu Star-Ad­vert­iser earli­er this month, 44 per­cent of voters said they would sup­port either the cre­ation of a sov­er­eign Nat­ive Hawaii­an na­tion in­teg­rated as a part of the United States, sim­il­ar to the status gran­ted to Nat­ive Amer­ic­an tribes, or as a sep­ar­ate na­tion in­de­pend­ent un­der the United Na­tions.

Des­pite these obstacles, both can­did­ates have ex­pressed op­tim­ism that they can mo­bil­ize voters on the ground and en­gage people in the race, a role in which labor en­dorse­ments will be key. Schatz has the back­ing of 28 loc­al uni­ons, in­clud­ing the state’s largest uni­on, the Hawaii Gov­ern­ment Em­ploy­ees Uni­on. But Hanabusa’s main­tains that her ties to the labor com­munity run deep, and she is con­fid­ent she’ll re­main com­pet­it­ive in that arena.

Hanabusa, a labor law­yer for over 30 years be­fore she em­barked on her first cam­paign for the state Sen­ate, said, “Some of [the uni­ons] en­dorsed be­fore I got in­to the race, and have been get­ting some pres­sure from D.C. from in­ter­na­tion­al uni­ons who en­dorsed Bri­an. But many of them have said to me ‘we’re friends.’ We have en­dorsed but that doesn’t mean we’ll be out there pound­ing the pave­ment,” not­ing that an en­dorse­ment is no guar­an­tee that all their mem­bers will vote for Schatz.

Hanabusa’s uni­on sup­port was bolstered last week by an en­dorse­ment from the ILUW Loc­al 142. The loc­al rep­res­ents blue-col­lar ag­ri­cul­tur­al and ware­house work­ers and has a pres­ence on every is­land. Hanabusa has also hired John Sals­bury of AF­SCME as her cam­paign man­ager, who pre­vi­ously worked on her 2010 House race and plans to build on her grass­roots field ef­forts from the last two cycles.

Hanabusa’s camp has also been crit­ic­al of Schatz’s de­cision to host out­go­ing New York City May­or Mi­chael Bloomberg in Hawaii for a fun­draiser in Janu­ary. Bloomberg has been no­tori­ously harsh on Big Apple uni­ons, and Hanabusa’s camp feels the move raises ques­tions about wheth­er Schatz is more com­mit­ted to rais­ing money than stick­ing to his prin­ciples.

On top of his labor back­ing, Schatz has an im­press­ive lineup of en­dorse­ments. The Demo­crat­ic Sen­ate Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, the League of Con­ser­va­tion Voters, the Si­erra Club, and Mo­ve­On.org have all thrown their sup­port to him. The league went on the air with its first TV ad sup­port­ing Schatz in Novem­ber.

But two Sen­ate en­dorse­ments are no­tice­ably miss­ing from Schatz’s list, and it re­mains to be seen wheth­er Hawaii voters will look to­ward the pref­er­ences of the main­land, or wheth­er they’ll look to the guid­ance of loc­al lead­ers in­clud­ing former Sen. Daniel Akaka and In­ouye’s fam­ily, who are sup­port­ing Hanabusa.

Aber­crom­bie, the state’s first-term gov­ernor and a former con­gress­man, faces a primary chal­lenge him­self in 2014. A Hon­olulu Civil Beat poll con­duc­ted in Oc­to­ber showed Aber­crom­bie with a 39 per­cent ap­prov­al rat­ing. Demo­crat­ic state Sen. Dav­id Ige, the chair of the Sen­ate Ways and Means Com­mit­tee, an­nounced he would chal­lenge Aber­crom­bie in Ju­ly and has already re­ceived the back­ing of two former gov­ernors, Ben Cayetano and George Ar­iy­oshi, who have to­geth­er led Hawaii for 20 of the 54 years since it gained state­hood. Mean­while, Obama en­dorsed Aber­crom­bie last Fri­day, which should give a boost to the em­battled in­cum­bent. But Obama hasn’t yet chimed in on the Sen­ate primary.

Schatz is fram­ing him­self as the most pro­gress­ive can­did­ate in the race and points to his re­cord on en­ti­tle­ments, small busi­ness, the en­vir­on­ment, mar­riage equal­ity, and choice. Hanabusa, mean­while, has placed a big­ger em­phas­is on mil­it­ary and vet­er­ans’ is­sues, which may not strike ob­serv­ers as a sure bet to fire up her party’s lib­er­al base.

Hawaii, however, is home to 11 mil­it­ary bases, and the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment sends more de­fense dol­lars per cap­ita to Hawaii than any oth­er state. A poll con­duc­ted by the Glob­al Strategy Group in the fi­nal week of Septem­ber showed 50 per­cent of voters said their fam­ily in­come was tied to the fed­er­al, state, or loc­al gov­ern­ment, and 39 per­cent said their fam­ily in­come is tied to the mil­it­ary. Three out of four re­spond­ents de­scribed the mil­it­ary as “very im­port­ant” to the state’s eco­nomy, un­der­scor­ing the anxi­ety sur­round­ing the flow of fed­er­al and de­fense dol­lars to the state in the wake of In­ouye’s passing and the se­quest­ra­tion cuts to the fed­er­al budget.

Hanabusa voted against the re­cent budget deal craf­ted by Rep. Paul Ry­an, R-Wis., and Sen. Patty Mur­ray, D-Wash., on the grounds that it bal­anced the budget on the backs of the kupuna, an af­fec­tion­ate term for Hawaii’s eld­erly, fed­er­al work­ers, mil­it­ary re­tir­ees, and the un­em­ployed. Her ob­jec­tion put her at odds with Schatz, who voted for the deal.

Hanabusa felt on its face a budget com­prom­ise was a good thing, but that the dev­il was in the de­tails, and so too could be the case in her Sen­ate con­test against Schatz. From afar this race ap­pears settled, but up close it’s any­thing but.

What We're Following See More »
CNN/ORC Has Clinton Up 5 Points
12 hours ago

Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 49%-44% in a new CNN/ORC poll out Monday afternoon. But it's Gary Johnson's performance, or lack thereof, that's the real story. Johnson, who had cleared 10% in some surveys earlier this fall, as he made a bid to qualify for the debates, is down to 3% support. He must hit 5% nationwide for the Libertarian Party to qualify for some federal matching funds in future elections.

McCarthy, Pelosi Team Up on National Guard Bonuses
14 hours ago

The majority and minority leader of the House are both saying "California's veterans are not to blame for being mistakenly overpaid, after a Los Angeles Times story revealed that officials are trying to claw back millions in bonuses from California National Guardsmen. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy called the efforts to recoup the money 'disgraceful,' and asked for the Department of Defense to waive the repayments soldiers would be forced to make if they inappropriately received re-enlistment bonuses for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan." Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said she's looking for a "legislative fix" in the lame-duck session.

IBD/TIPP Poll Shows a Dead Heat
17 hours ago

A new Investor’s Business Daily/TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence poll shows Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump each earning 41% support. On the one hand, the poll has been skewing in Trump's favor this year, relative to other polls. But on the other, data guru Nate Silver called the IBD/TIPP poll the most accurate in 2012.

Clinton Leads by 12 in ABC Tracking Poll
22 hours ago

Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump by 12 percentage points among likely voters, 50 to 38 percent, in a new ABC News tracking poll, "her highest support and his lowest to date in ABC News and ABC News/Washington Post polls. Gary Johnson has 5 percent support, Jill Stein 2 percent. Clinton led by only four points in the last ABC/Post poll on Oct. 13.

Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
3 days ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.