Deportation Anxiety Is Making Latinos Obamacare Shy

Latinos are an essential component of the health insurance marketplace. But how do mixed-immigration status families know information they provide to the exchanges won’t be used against them?

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Lucia Graves
Dec. 27, 2013, 3:22 a.m.

En­roll­ment num­bers aren’t in yet, but the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion already knows it has few­er Lati­nos signed up than it would like. One of the reas­ons they’re not en­rolling? People in mixed-im­mig­ra­tion status fam­il­ies worry per­son­al in­form­a­tion sub­mit­ted un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act could be used to de­port someone in their fam­ily.

“That’s a big fear and something that the cam­paign is try­ing to ad­dress,” said Hilda Mar­tinez, a cam­paign man­ager for Cali­for­nia En­dow­ment’s “Get Covered” cam­paign, which has spent tens of mil­lions of dol­lars on Span­ish-lan­guage me­dia out­reach. Un­will­ing to take a chance with their fam­ily be­ing torn apart, some im­mig­rants are tak­ing a chance with their health or their chil­dren’s health.

The is­sue is es­pe­cially crit­ic­al in Cali­for­nia, which has a big Latino pop­u­la­tion and has em­ployed one of the most vig­or­ous pub­lic-out­reach cam­paigns in the coun­try.

Au­thor­it­ies have de­por­ted a re­cord num­ber of im­mig­rants in re­cent years — more than 1.9 mil­lion since Pres­id­ent Obama took of­fice. With im­mig­ra­tion re­form stalled, it looks like more of the same will oc­cur in the new year.

U.S. Im­mig­ra­tion and Cus­toms En­force­ment has is­sued a let­ter as­sur­ing people that in­form­a­tion sub­mit­ted as part of ap­ply­ing for health in­sur­ance un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act will not be used for im­mig­ra­tion en­force­ment.

But Daniel Zin­gale, seni­or vice pres­id­ent with the Cali­for­nia En­dow­ment, says this as­sur­ance isn’t enough. “I think something from the pres­id­ent him­self would be help­ful,” he told Vic­tor­ia Col­li­v­er of the San Fran­cisco Chron­icle. Mar­tinez ad­ded it would be es­pe­cially use­ful to have something in Span­ish.

Bey­ond de­port­a­tion fears, Lati­nos who’ve avoided the health care sys­tem in the past lack ex­per­i­ence with the com­plex in­sur­ance land­scape. An­oth­er dif­fi­culty is provid­ing enough en­roll­ment coun­selors to as­sist Span­ish-speak­ing res­id­ents, who typ­ic­ally prefer face-to-face in­ter­ac­tions over the an­onym­ity of a web­site.

For those who want cov­er­age Jan. 1, the dead­line to sign up was Monday. The over­all en­roll­ment peri­od will con­tin­ue through March 31. These prob­lems of Latino en­roll­ment, however, will be dif­fi­cult to re­solve in just a few months.

The White House cer­tainly has mo­tiv­a­tion to pub­li­cize and em­phas­ize these as­sur­ances to the Latino pop­u­la­tion, whose en­roll­ment is con­sidered key to the suc­cess of the Af­ford­able Care Act’s rol­lout. Young­er and health­i­er than the av­er­age un­in­sured Amer­ic­an, Lati­nos would help cre­ate a bal­anced and af­ford­able health in­sur­ance pool.

And yet, giv­en ICE’s policy of pro­sec­utori­al dis­cre­tion, you can’t blame these fam­il­ies for wor­ry­ing. More than 368,000 people were de­por­ted this fisc­al year, and that’s ac­tu­ally a de­crease from the 409,000 de­por­ted dur­ing fisc­al 2012. In 2011, about 397,000 were de­por­ted.

“These fam­il­ies are just very fear­ful wheth­er it’s true or not,” said Mar­tinez. “We don’t have any reas­on to doubt the ad­min­is­tra­tion,” she ad­ded in ref­er­ence to ICE’s re­as­sur­ing mes­sage this fall, “but there’s this fear in the com­munity that isn’t just go­ing to go away with a let­ter.”

What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
11 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
IT’S ALL CLINTON
Reliable Poll Data Coming in RE: Debate #1
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
×