Democrats have said for years that Obamacare will get more popular as people begin to see its benefits. Now we’ll find out whether that’s true.
Many of the Affordable Care Act’s most popular provisions take effect Wednesday. Beginning this week, insurers cannot use a preexisting condition as a reason to deny someone coverage or charge a higher premium. New insurance policies take effect that must cover certain benefits. And, biggest of all, new tax subsidies kick in to help low-income consumers cover the cost of their premiums.
All of this is happening amid stubbornly bad — and, according to some polls, falling — public approval of the health care law. The latest tracking poll from the Kaiser Family Foundation put its favorability rating at 34 percent, compared with 48 percent who had an unfavorable view.
Obamacare’s approval ratings have been upside-down for years, and Democrats had all but given up trying to turn the numbers around until the law’s most popular provisions took effect.
The botched rollout of HealthCare.gov made matters worse. Approval of the law, and President Obama’s own approval ratings, sank as the federal enrollment website sputtered. Administration officials say their biggest concern during the site’s early troubles was that people would give up on the Obamacare “brand” and simply wouldn’t come back to the site once it began working.
That hasn’t happened.
According to the Health and Human Services Department, more than 975,000 people selected and enrolled in a plan through HealthCare.gov this month. The total for all 50 states is now above 2 million — still shy of the 3.3 million sign-ups HHS initially expected to receive by the end of the year, but rapidly picking up steam.
One potential problem for the administration, though, is that people don’t associate new benefits they might like with the health care law. As Democratic strategists have noted, coverage under the Affordable Care Act isn’t an easily identifiable benefit like Medicare or Social Security. It’s private insurance, paid for in part by a subsidy that goes directly to the insurance company.
Many individual pieces of the Affordable Care Act, including many of the policies that take effect Jan. 1, are popular on their own. The administration has already struggled with earlier benefits — namely rebates paid by insurance companies — that poll well but which people don’t seem to connect to Obamacare.
And that’s assuming people like the coverage they’ll get under the law. In order to keep premiums low, many insurance companies have limited the network of providers they’ll cover in new policies, meaning some people who had their plans canceled might not be able to keep their doctors. And consumers who benefited most from the pre-Obamacare individual market — young, healthy, reasonably affluent men — will see their premiums for coverage rise under the new rules.
If consumers don’t like the coverage they get, or don’t connect it to Obamacare, public approval could continue to sag, creating a drag on Democratic candidates in 2014.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."