Koch-Funded Group to Hit Trio of Vulnerable Dems Over Obamacare Support

All three hail from states that will be key to Democrats holding their Senate majority.

US Senators Mary L. Landrieu, D-LA, speaks during a press conference to highlight the impact of the government shutdown on small bussinesses on October 3, 2013 in the Mansfield Room of the US Capitol in Washington, DC. AFP PHOTO/Mandel NGAN (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Add to Briefcase
Clara Ritger
Jan. 2, 2014, 8:17 a.m.

A Koch broth­ers-backed con­ser­vat­ive group is launch­ing a $2.5 mil­lion ad cam­paign aimed at Sen­ate Demo­crats who sup­por­ted the Af­ford­able Care Act and face reelec­tion chal­lenges this year.

Start­ing to­mor­row, Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity is run­ning a three-week ad­vert­ising blitz against Sens. Kay Hagan of North Car­o­lina, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hamp­shire, and Mary Landrieu of Louisi­ana. Hagan and Landrieu have both faced the cri­ti­cism of Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity in pre­vi­ous me­dia buys. The or­gan­iz­a­tion has spent more than $4 mil­lion in North Car­o­lina and more than $2 mil­lion in Louisi­ana on the sen­at­ors.

In a press re­lease Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity cited Pres­id­ent Obama’s “If you like your plan, you can keep it” prom­ise that he failed to make good on after in­sur­ance com­pan­ies began send­ing can­cel­la­tion no­tices to con­sumers who had cov­er­age that did not com­ply with the health law’s new re­quire­ments.

“We’re put­ting pres­sure on sen­at­ors who re­peated that lie and doubled down on Obama­care even as it be­came ob­vi­ous that the law was hurt­ing mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans,” said AFP Pres­id­ent Tim Phil­lips in the re­lease.

Hagan and Landrieu are both run­ning in states that favored Re­pub­lic­an chal­lenger Mitt Rom­ney over Pres­id­ent Obama in the 2012 pres­id­en­tial elec­tion. Rom­ney won North Car­o­lina with 50.6 per­cent of the state’s vote to 48.4 per­cent for Obama. In Louisi­ana, Rom­ney won in a land­slide, win­ning 57.8 per­cent to 40.6 per­cent for Obama.

New Hamp­shire went for Obama in 2012, but in 2010 the state’s res­id­ents elec­ted Sen. Kelly Ayotte, a Re­pub­lic­an and staunch op­pon­ent of Obama­care.

“These sen­at­ors are in the states that are among the most op­posed to Obama­care,” Phil­lips said. “They went the fur­thest away from the wishes of their states.”

Among the suc­cess­ful out­comes Phil­lips hopes will come from the ad cam­paign is the com­mit­ment by the three sen­at­ors to make changes to and even­tu­ally re­peal the pres­id­ent’s health law.

“Politi­cians will do any­thing when they’re frightened for their po­s­i­tions,” Phil­lips said. “They’ve already taken steps to dis­tance them­selves from the law.”

Last fall, Landrieu in­tro­duced le­gis­la­tion to let Amer­ic­ans with health in­sur­ance policies that did not com­ply with the law’s cov­er­age re­quire­ments keep them. After Health­Care.gov‘s troubled rol­lout, Shaheen pro­posed a two-month ex­ten­sion of the open-en­roll­ment peri­od. Hagan cir­cu­lated a let­ter ask­ing for an in-depth in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to the web­site’s cost and de­vel­op­ment. She was also a sup­port­er of Landrieu’s bill.

What We're Following See More »
PASSAGE NOT GUARANTEED
House Freedom Caucus Endorses Obamacare Replacement
36 minutes ago
BREAKING

After more than a month of back and forth, a failed bill, and GOP embarrassment, the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus has announced that it will support the Obamacare replacement legislation in its most recent iteration. Rep. Mark Meadows, the chairman of the caucus, said the roughly 30 members of the caucus view this compromise as the best option short of a full repeal. A recent amendment, authored by Meadows and Rep. Tom McArthur, co-chair of the more moderate Tuesday Group, would allow states to apply for waivers exempting them from provisions forbidding insurers from charging higher prices to those with pre-existing conditions if the state set up a high-risk pool. The plan's passage in the House is not a done deal though, as a number of moderate lawmakers have resisted supporting the amendment.

COULD RATTLE MARKETS
White House Working On Order To Leave NATO
1 hours ago
BREAKING
IRANIANS CAME WITHIN 1,000 METERS
U.S. Navy Vessel Fired Flare at Iranian Boat on Monday
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer fired a warning flare toward an Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessel coming near it in the Persian Gulf. The incident happened Monday as the vessel closed to within 1,000 meters of the USS Mahan, "despite the destroyer trying to turn away from it." After attempting to contact the Iranian vessel and sounding its whistle, it deployed the flare. After that, the ship had had enough and turned away.

Source:
ON SANCTUARY CITIES
White House Attacks Judge Who Suspended Executive Order
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.

MAY BRING CONSERVATIVES ON BOARD, BUT WHAT ABOUT MODERATES?
House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login