Obama Should Ask Dennis Kucinich About Fighting Nuns

The president’s Justice Department could take a cautionary lesson from the Cleveland mayor’s tussle with the Little Sisters.

National Journal
George E. Condon Jr.
Add to Briefcase
George E. Condon Jr.
Jan. 3, 2014, 12:10 p.m.

If Pres­id­ent Obama thinks he has a chance to win a pub­lic re­la­tions battle with the Little Sis­ters of the Poor, per­haps he should talk to Den­nis Ku­cinich. The former con­gress­man is one of the few politi­cians who took on the nuns. It was dur­ing Ku­cinich’s tu­mul­tu­ous one term as may­or of Clev­e­land and Ku­cinich lost. De­cis­ively. Mem­or­ably.

That was in 1978, 36 years be­fore Obama’s Justice De­part­ment got tangled up in this week’s leg­al skir­mish with the 160-year-old or­der of sis­ters de­voted to help­ing the old and needy. The nuns are caught up in the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s re­quire­ment that em­ploy­er-offered health plans cov­er con­tra­cep­tion and abor­tion drugs, both of which are against Cath­ol­ic teach­ing.

This battle is far more leg­al­ist­ic and much less col­or­ful than the fight Ku­cinich picked soon after his 1977 elec­tion as may­or. He took of­fice in Janu­ary, a no­tori­ously fri­gid month along the shores of Lake Erie. And one of his ad­min­is­tra­tion’s first acts was to toss the nuns out of City Hall and out in­to the snow. The nuns in that case were not the Little Sis­ters of the Poor; they were the Daugh­ters of St. Paul, a smal­ler or­der also noted for their good works in the com­munity. Oddly, as news stor­ies about Ku­cinich’s ac­tion spread across the coun­try, the epis­ode be­came known as “Ku­cinich versus the Little Sis­ters of the Poor.”

Re­gard­less of the name of the or­der, tak­ing on nuns was not a pub­lic-re­la­tions stroke of geni­us in a city with a large eth­nic Cath­ol­ic pop­u­la­tion. Ku­cinich coun­ted on a leg­al­ist­ic de­fense, with his Law Dir­ect­or ar­guing that if you let nuns so­li­cit in­side City Hall “then you let every­one in, and that in­cludes the Moon­ies.” But Sis­ter Mary Le­onora was giv­en an un­usu­al pub­lic for­um by the city coun­cil to point out how much money the may­or’s policy had cost them. Ku­cinich, who him­self had been taught by nuns, said he wanted to “be on the side of the an­gels.” But he de­cidedly was not on the side of the voters and his clash with the nuns was cited al­most as much as the city’s his­tor­ic in­solv­ency when Ku­cinich was forced in­to a re­call elec­tion.

Clev­e­land’s ex­per­i­ence res­on­ates today be­cause Ku­cinich was al­most cer­tainly cor­rect in his as­sess­ment of the state of the law and the un­ortho­dox nature of let­ting one char­ity so­li­cit funds in a pub­lic build­ing. But that cor­rect­ness was lost against the vivid pic­tures of nuns be­ing tossed out in the Clev­e­land snows at Christ­mas­time.

Today, the Justice De­part­ment is con­vinced that the Cath­ol­ic or­gan­iz­a­tions su­ing to keep the gov­ern­ment from en­for­cing the con­tra­cep­tion man­date in the new health care law do not need an ex­emp­tion from the law. At is­sue for the Su­preme Court is wheth­er to ex­tend a tem­por­ary in­junc­tion gran­ted the church groups by Justice So­nia So­to­may­or. The gov­ern­ment ar­gued that groups like the Little Sis­ters of the Poor can’t ap­peal be­cause the law really doesn’t re­quire them to of­fer con­tra­cep­tion be­cause their in­sur­ance is provided by Chris­ti­an Broth­ers Ser­vices, a church or­gan­iz­a­tion the Justice De­part­ment says is already ex­cused from the law’s man­date.

But con­ser­vat­ive groups are in­tent on cast­ing this as Big Gov­ern­ment against Nuns. What the gov­ern­ment wants the Little Sis­ters of the Poor to do, con­tends the Beck­et Fund for Re­li­gious Liberty, “vi­ol­ates their faith.” The con­ser­vat­ive group ad­ded, “They shouldn’t be forced to di­vert funds from the poor eld­erly and dy­ing people they’ve de­voted their lives to serve.”

On the pos­it­ive side for the gov­ern­ment, though, no nuns have been tossed out in­to the snow this time. But the polit­ic­al les­son is prob­ably still the same, ac­cord­ing to Brent Lar­kin, who was the polit­ic­al writer at the Plain Deal­er when Ku­cinich was may­or. “It wasn’t pretty” he told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “Ku­cinich learned that politi­cians don’t win when they take on nuns.”

What We're Following See More »
WON’T INTERFERE IN STRUCTURING NSC OFFICE
White House to Give McMaster Carte Blanche
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
RESTROOM ISSUES RETURN
Trump To Rescind Trans Protections
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Donald Trump is planning to reverse an Obama-era order requiring that schools allow students to use the bathroom that coincides with their gender identity. Trump "has green-lighted the plan for the Justice Department and Education Department to send a “Dear Colleague” letter to schools rescinding the guidance." A case is going before the Supreme Court on March 28 in which Gavin Grimm, a transgender high school student, is suing his high school for forbidding him to use the men's room.

Source:
NAIVE, RISK TAKER
Russia Compiling Dossier on Trump’s Mind
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Retired Russian diplomats and members of Vladimir Putin's staff are compiling a dossier "on Donald Trump's psychological makeup" for the Russian leader. "Among its preliminary conclusions is that the new American leader is a risk-taker who can be naïve, according to a senior Kremlin adviser."

Source:
“HORRIBLE” AND “PAINFUL”
Trump Addresses Threats On Jewish Community Centers
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS
COULD COME TUESDAY
Trump Set To Issue New Travel Ban
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Donald Trump is set to issue a new and more focused executive order clarifying the scope of his travel ban, hoping that the order will survive legal challenges. The new order would focus on the same seven countries, "but would only bar entry to those without a visa and who have never entered the United States before. Unlike the original order, people from those countries who already have permanent U.S. residency (green cards) or visas would not face any restrictions." Some lawyers believe the government will now have much stronger standing, though lawyers who challenged the initial order see the same core problems with the forthcoming ban.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login