A new 60 Minutes story concludes there’s little to show for tens of billions of dollars in taxpayer support for green-technology companies.
Reporter Lesley Stahl’s piece cites a “string of expensive tax-funded flops” such as the failure of Energy Department-backed companies Solyndra and Fisker Automotive, as well as the struggles of venture capitalists.
Asked if clean tech is “dead,” former Energy Department Undersecretary for Science Steven Koonin tells Stahl, “There are parts of it that I would say are on life support right now.”
But he also defends the Energy Department’s loan program for green-energy companies, noting new technologies demonstrated.
The 60 Minutes piece isn’t 100 percent doom and gloom. It cites the success of Tesla Motors, the electric-car company that has repaid its Energy Department loan, and allows that “a few” other companies show promise.
But the story takes a dim enough view of Obama administration funding and the state of clean technology to prompt strong criticism from the industry and its political allies.
Advocates say loans for green energy projects and other forms of federal support, including longstanding tax credits, are paying off.
Center for American Progress climate blogger Joe Romm responded with a chart-heavy post Sunday night that notes the growing deployment and falling costs of solar and wind energy.
The report and the response are the latest thrust and parry over White House backing for green-energy projects that have faced heavy GOP criticism.
The Energy Department — which Stahl said declined to grant her an interview — hit back on Sunday night. The department has for years noted that failed or badly struggling companies represent only a very small portion of the overall green-energy loan portfolio.
“Simply put, 60 Minutes is flat wrong on the facts. The clean-energy economy in America is real, and we are more competitive than ever in this rapidly expanding global industry. This is a race we can, must, and will win,” spokesman William Gibbons said in a statement.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."