A minimum-wage increase won’t have the vetting of a committee vote before it comes to the Senate floor, likely in February, a key lawmaker in the debate said Tuesday. The decision to keep a hot Democratic campaign issue out of committee is designed to limit the number of “embarrassing amendments” Republicans can offer.
“We decided not to do it in committee but to come directly to the floor,” said Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chairman Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, who is sponsoring legislation to raise the minimum wage from $7.25 per hour to $10.10 per hour in three annual increments. “Then they get to offer all kinds of embarrassing amendments and stuff in committee, and why do it twice? Do it once.”
The decision to bypass deliberation in committee will do nothing but inflame Republicans, who were smarting with anger at Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Tuesday after the Senate voted 60-37 to proceed to final passage on an unemployment insurance bill.
“It’s totally dictatorial,” said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who decried Reid’s tactics in ramming the bill to extend long-term jobless benefits down Republicans’ throats without committee consideration or amendments. “He won’t allow a single amendment. How can we negotiate?”
“It’s all political,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., of the unemployment vote. “Unfortunately, the Senate is starting the new year they way the ended up last year” — with bills being placed on the floor without ever being considered in committee. “The Senate has become a one-man show, and that man is Senator Reid guided by the White House,” he said.
Republicans are squirming under the tough tactics that Democrats are using to pressure them to vote for legislation that gives benefits to jobless or low-wage workers. Six Republicans joined with all Senate Democrats and independents on an unemployment extension to give the chamber the necessary 60 votes to complete the legislation, which would extend long-term benefits until March 31.
“I’m not comfortable at all. I’m tremendously uncomfortable,” said McCain of his “no” vote on the unemployment bill. But, he added that he can’t in good conscience vote for legislation that he has had no say on.
Cue up the same protests for the minimum-wage debate, which will again put moderate Republicans in a tough position. A recent ABC/Washington Post poll found that 60 percent of Americans favor a minimum-wage increase. Republican lawmakers generally oppose minimum-wage hikes, citing burdens on small businesses and a drag on employment. Politically, however, those arguments fall flat with the general public.
Republicans could try to minimize the damage of opposing a minimum-wage increase by proposing to winnow down the size of the increase to, say, $9 per hour instead of $10.10. But that would require an amendment process, and one of their chances at offering amendments — in committee — has disappeared.
What We're Following See More »
"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."
According to a new report, the Environmental Protection Agency waited too long before informing the residents of Flint, Mich. that their water was contaminated with lead. Written by the EPA's inspector general, it places blame squarely at the foot of the agency itself, saying it had enough information by June 2015 to issue an emergency order. However, the order wasn't issued until the end of January 2016.