Democrats Bypass Committee on Minimum-Wage Bill to Limit ‘Embarrassing’ GOP Amendments

Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Tom Harkin, D-IA, speaks during a briefing on a bipartisan proposal to expand early childhood education from birth to age 5 at the senate visitors center of the US Capitol on November 13, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Fawn Johnson
Add to Briefcase
Fawn Johnson
Jan. 7, 2014, 7:35 a.m.

A min­im­um-wage in­crease won’t have the vet­ting of a com­mit­tee vote be­fore it comes to the Sen­ate floor, likely in Feb­ru­ary, a key law­maker in the de­bate said Tues­day. The de­cision to keep a hot Demo­crat­ic cam­paign is­sue out of com­mit­tee is de­signed to lim­it the num­ber of “em­bar­rass­ing amend­ments” Re­pub­lic­ans can of­fer.

“We de­cided not to do it in com­mit­tee but to come dir­ectly to the floor,” said Sen­ate Health, Edu­ca­tion, Labor, and Pen­sions Com­mit­tee Chair­man Tom Har­kin, D-Iowa, who is spon­sor­ing le­gis­la­tion to raise the min­im­um wage from $7.25 per hour to $10.10 per hour in three an­nu­al in­cre­ments. “Then they get to of­fer all kinds of em­bar­rass­ing amend­ments and stuff in com­mit­tee, and why do it twice? Do it once.”

The de­cision to by­pass de­lib­er­a­tion in com­mit­tee will do noth­ing but in­flame Re­pub­lic­ans, who were smart­ing with an­ger at Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id on Tues­day after the Sen­ate voted 60-37 to pro­ceed to fi­nal pas­sage on an un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance bill.

“It’s totally dic­tat­ori­al,” said Sen. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., who de­cried Re­id’s tac­tics in ram­ming the bill to ex­tend long-term job­less be­ne­fits down Re­pub­lic­ans’ throats without com­mit­tee con­sid­er­a­tion or amend­ments. “He won’t al­low a single amend­ment. How can we ne­go­ti­ate?”

“It’s all polit­ic­al,” said Sen. Lamar Al­ex­an­der, R-Tenn., of the un­em­ploy­ment vote. “Un­for­tu­nately, the Sen­ate is start­ing the new year they way the ended up last year” — with bills be­ing placed on the floor without ever be­ing con­sidered in com­mit­tee. “The Sen­ate has be­come a one-man show, and that man is Sen­at­or Re­id guided by the White House,” he said.

Re­pub­lic­ans are squirm­ing un­der the tough tac­tics that Demo­crats are us­ing to pres­sure them to vote for le­gis­la­tion that gives be­ne­fits to job­less or low-wage work­ers. Six Re­pub­lic­ans joined with all Sen­ate Demo­crats and in­de­pend­ents on an un­em­ploy­ment ex­ten­sion to give the cham­ber the ne­ces­sary 60 votes to com­plete the le­gis­la­tion, which would ex­tend long-term be­ne­fits un­til March 31.

“I’m not com­fort­able at all. I’m tre­mend­ously un­com­fort­able,” said Mc­Cain of his “no” vote on the un­em­ploy­ment bill. But, he ad­ded that he can’t in good con­science vote for le­gis­la­tion that he has had no say on.

Cue up the same protests for the min­im­um-wage de­bate, which will again put mod­er­ate Re­pub­lic­ans in a tough po­s­i­tion. A re­cent ABC/Wash­ing­ton Post poll found that 60 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans fa­vor a min­im­um-wage in­crease. Re­pub­lic­an law­makers gen­er­ally op­pose min­im­um-wage hikes, cit­ing bur­dens on small busi­nesses and a drag on em­ploy­ment. Polit­ic­ally, however, those ar­gu­ments fall flat with the gen­er­al pub­lic.

Re­pub­lic­ans could try to min­im­ize the dam­age of op­pos­ing a min­im­um-wage in­crease by pro­pos­ing to win­now down the size of the in­crease to, say, $9 per hour in­stead of $10.10. But that would re­quire an amend­ment pro­cess, and one of their chances at of­fer­ing amend­ments — in com­mit­tee — has dis­ap­peared.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
8 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×