Democrats Bypass Committee on Minimum-Wage Bill to Limit ‘Embarrassing’ GOP Amendments

Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Tom Harkin, D-IA, speaks during a briefing on a bipartisan proposal to expand early childhood education from birth to age 5 at the senate visitors center of the US Capitol on November 13, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Fawn Johnson
Add to Briefcase
Fawn Johnson
Jan. 7, 2014, 7:35 a.m.

A min­im­um-wage in­crease won’t have the vet­ting of a com­mit­tee vote be­fore it comes to the Sen­ate floor, likely in Feb­ru­ary, a key law­maker in the de­bate said Tues­day. The de­cision to keep a hot Demo­crat­ic cam­paign is­sue out of com­mit­tee is de­signed to lim­it the num­ber of “em­bar­rass­ing amend­ments” Re­pub­lic­ans can of­fer.

“We de­cided not to do it in com­mit­tee but to come dir­ectly to the floor,” said Sen­ate Health, Edu­ca­tion, Labor, and Pen­sions Com­mit­tee Chair­man Tom Har­kin, D-Iowa, who is spon­sor­ing le­gis­la­tion to raise the min­im­um wage from $7.25 per hour to $10.10 per hour in three an­nu­al in­cre­ments. “Then they get to of­fer all kinds of em­bar­rass­ing amend­ments and stuff in com­mit­tee, and why do it twice? Do it once.”

The de­cision to by­pass de­lib­er­a­tion in com­mit­tee will do noth­ing but in­flame Re­pub­lic­ans, who were smart­ing with an­ger at Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id on Tues­day after the Sen­ate voted 60-37 to pro­ceed to fi­nal pas­sage on an un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance bill.

“It’s totally dic­tat­ori­al,” said Sen. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., who de­cried Re­id’s tac­tics in ram­ming the bill to ex­tend long-term job­less be­ne­fits down Re­pub­lic­ans’ throats without com­mit­tee con­sid­er­a­tion or amend­ments. “He won’t al­low a single amend­ment. How can we ne­go­ti­ate?”

“It’s all polit­ic­al,” said Sen. Lamar Al­ex­an­der, R-Tenn., of the un­em­ploy­ment vote. “Un­for­tu­nately, the Sen­ate is start­ing the new year they way the ended up last year” — with bills be­ing placed on the floor without ever be­ing con­sidered in com­mit­tee. “The Sen­ate has be­come a one-man show, and that man is Sen­at­or Re­id guided by the White House,” he said.

Re­pub­lic­ans are squirm­ing un­der the tough tac­tics that Demo­crats are us­ing to pres­sure them to vote for le­gis­la­tion that gives be­ne­fits to job­less or low-wage work­ers. Six Re­pub­lic­ans joined with all Sen­ate Demo­crats and in­de­pend­ents on an un­em­ploy­ment ex­ten­sion to give the cham­ber the ne­ces­sary 60 votes to com­plete the le­gis­la­tion, which would ex­tend long-term be­ne­fits un­til March 31.

“I’m not com­fort­able at all. I’m tre­mend­ously un­com­fort­able,” said Mc­Cain of his “no” vote on the un­em­ploy­ment bill. But, he ad­ded that he can’t in good con­science vote for le­gis­la­tion that he has had no say on.

Cue up the same protests for the min­im­um-wage de­bate, which will again put mod­er­ate Re­pub­lic­ans in a tough po­s­i­tion. A re­cent ABC/Wash­ing­ton Post poll found that 60 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans fa­vor a min­im­um-wage in­crease. Re­pub­lic­an law­makers gen­er­ally op­pose min­im­um-wage hikes, cit­ing bur­dens on small busi­nesses and a drag on em­ploy­ment. Polit­ic­ally, however, those ar­gu­ments fall flat with the gen­er­al pub­lic.

Re­pub­lic­ans could try to min­im­ize the dam­age of op­pos­ing a min­im­um-wage in­crease by pro­pos­ing to win­now down the size of the in­crease to, say, $9 per hour in­stead of $10.10. But that would re­quire an amend­ment pro­cess, and one of their chances at of­fer­ing amend­ments — in com­mit­tee — has dis­ap­peared.

What We're Following See More »
INDICTMENTS NOT PROOF OF COLLUSION
Rosenstein Holds Presser On Russian Indictments
3 days ago
THE DETAILS
Source:
CONTRADICTS TRUMP’S DENIALS
U.S. Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Interference
3 days ago
THE LATEST

The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."

Source:
“QUEEN FOR A DAY”
Gates Said to Be Finalizing a Plea Deal
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."

Source:
ZERO-FOR-TWO
Another Defeat for Immigration Legislation in the Senate
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "

Source:
DISPUTE ASSERTION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
House Intel Panel Could Charge Bannon with Contempt
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login