Senate Democrats: “˜We’re All a Bit Surprised’ by Unemployment Benefits Vote

After a vote to proceed with an insurance-extension bill, Senate Democrats and President Obama trade frustration for optimism.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Marina Koren
Jan. 7, 2014, 8 a.m.

An hour be­fore the Sen­ate voted on push­ing an un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance bill for­ward Tues­day, it ap­peared that the Re­pub­lic­an votes the Demo­crats needed wer­en’t there. When six votes ma­ter­i­al­ized, just enough to reach the 60 re­quired for pas­sage, Demo­crats seemed al­most un­pre­pared to cel­eb­rate rather than slam.

“I think we’re all a bit sur­prised,” said Sher­rod Brown of Ohio dur­ing a press con­fer­ence with oth­er Sen­ate Demo­crats. The vote opens the bill, which would ex­tend un­em­ploy­ment be­ne­fits that lapsed for 1.3 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans at the end of 2013 for an­oth­er three months, up to de­bate.

Rhode Is­land’s Jack Reed, a spon­sor of the bill, at­trib­uted his sur­prise to “be­ing Ir­ish” and “al­ways ex­pect­ing the worst.” He said he must “per­son­ally thank” Dean Heller of Nevada, the bill’s Re­pub­lic­an spon­sor. Heller said Monday that passing the le­gis­la­tion is “the right thing to do.”

Sen­ate Demo­crats praised Tues­day’s bi­par­tis­an ef­fort. For Brown, the show­ing is an in­dic­a­tion of fu­ture com­prom­ise. “I think it means good news for a min­im­um-wage in­crease down the road,” he said.

For some Demo­crats, clear­ing Tues­day’s pro­ced­ur­al hurdle seemed too easy. “Are [Re­pub­lic­ans] go­ing through a charade to show they really, really want a bill, but they just can’t come to an agree­ment?” Chuck Schu­mer of New York wondered. “We hope this is a good-faith ne­go­ti­ation.”

The bill could come up for an­oth­er vote in the Sen­ate this week but not be­fore hours of ne­go­ti­ations, most of which will fo­cus on how to pay for the $6.4 bil­lion ex­ten­sion. “That’s a lot easi­er said than done,” Schu­mer said.

The bill’s fu­ture in the House, if it makes it there, re­mains un­clear. Speak­er John Boehner, who has ob­jec­ted to the ex­ten­sion as is, will in­sist on cut­ting costs else­where to find the money to fund more be­ne­fits. In a state­ment after the vote, Boehner said: “An­oth­er ex­ten­sion of tem­por­ary emer­gency un­em­ploy­ment be­ne­fits should not only be paid for but in­clude something to help put people back to work.”

This le­gis­la­tion also serves as a start­ing point for Pres­id­ent Obama’s re­por­ted fo­cus of his up­com­ing State of the Uni­on ad­dress: in­come in­equal­ity. Dur­ing a speech after the vote, flanked by un­em­ployed cit­izens, the pres­id­ent didn’t skip a beat of op­tim­ism, spelling out his philo­sophy in terms bound to make his crit­ics cringe.

“We make this prom­ise to our fel­low Amer­ic­ans be­cause when times get tough, we are not a people who say ‘you’re on your own’; we’re people who be­lieve we are all in this to­geth­er,” he said, later adding a thinly veiled tagline for 2014, “Hope is con­ta­gious.”

Contributions by Brian Resnick

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.