Obama Invites NSA’s Top Congressional Critics to Meet at White House

Thursday’s meeting is by invitation only and staffers are banned from attending.

Demonstrators hold up a placard in support of former US agent of the National Security Agency, Edward Snowden in front of Berlin's landmark Brandenburg Gate as they take part in a protest against the U.S. National Security Agency.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
Jan. 7, 2014, 8:12 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama will sum­mon key law­makers to the White House on Thursday to dis­cuss the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s con­tro­ver­sial spy­ing pro­grams, ac­cord­ing to staffers.

Con­gres­sion­al aides said that the meet­ing’s at­tend­ance will be small, in­clud­ing only Pres­id­ent Obama, seni­or White House staff, and the chair­men and rank­ing mem­bers of each cham­ber’s Ju­di­ciary and In­tel­li­gence com­mit­tees. Also in­vited are a few “key play­ers,” staffers say, such as Demo­crat­ic Sens. Mark Ud­all and Ron Wyden and Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner — a trio that has been par­tic­u­larly crit­ic­al of the NSA’s data-gath­er­ing ef­forts.

The meet­ing is by in­vit­a­tion only and staffers are banned from at­tend­ing, ac­cord­ing to the aides.

Sen. Di­anne Fein­stein, the Cali­for­nia Demo­crat who chairs the Sen­ate Se­lect Com­mit­tee on In­tel­li­gence, con­firmed on Tues­day that she would at­tend the meet­ing.

A sep­ar­ate meet­ing is planned for Wed­nes­day in the Situ­ation Room between rel­ev­ant White House aides and con­gres­sion­al staffers.

It re­mains un­clear pre­cisely what Obama wants to dis­cuss, but one aide ex­pec­ted him to of­fer some re­forms in an at­tempt to garner sup­port from the law­makers. Oth­ers view the meet­ing as curs­ory, an at­tempt to check the “met with law­makers” box be­fore an­noun­cing any pro­posed changes to the NSA.

Sen. Richard Blu­menth­al, D-Conn., a key ad­voc­ate of tak­ing away the NSA’s mass sur­veil­lance powers, said Tues­day that he is op­tim­ist­ic the ad­min­is­tra­tion is tak­ing pos­it­ive steps for­ward.

“The pres­id­ent is go­ing to be hav­ing some meet­ings, I un­der­stand. He’s go­ing to be ob­vi­ously com­ing out with some of his po­s­i­tions,” he said. “I think we’ll know more by the end of the week.”

But staffers close to oth­er law­makers ex­pressed skep­ti­cism that Obama would enu­mer­ate spe­cif­ic re­forms Thursday. “I do not think this ad­min­is­tra­tion will turn this pro­gram off,” a Demo­crat­ic staffer said, re­fer­ring to the NSA’s sweep­ing col­lec­tion of tele­phone metadata. “That will re­quire con­gres­sion­al ac­tion.”

Earli­er re­ports in­dic­ate Obama is pre­par­ing to an­nounce a slew of in­tel­li­gence re­forms ahead of his State of the Uni­on ad­dress on Jan. 28. Ex­pec­ted changes in­clude pla­cing a pub­lic ad­voc­ate with­in the secret For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court, which cur­rently only hears from gov­ern­ment law­yers re­quest­ing sur­veil­lance au­thor­ity, and trans­fer­ring con­trol of the NSA’s tele­phone metadata re­cords to private phone com­pan­ies from which the gov­ern­ment could is­sue data re­quests.

Obama has said he would re­view a pres­id­en­tial task force’s list of 46 re­com­men­ded changes and “make a pretty defin­it­ive state­ment about all of this in Janu­ary.” He re­peatedly re­buffed cri­ti­cism of the agency’s bulk data col­lec­tion, say­ing, “I have con­fid­ence that the NSA is not en­ga­ging in do­mest­ic sur­veil­lance and not snoop­ing around,” but con­ced­ing that more needs to be done to re­store pub­lic con­fid­ence in the pro­grams.

Sensen­bren­ner in­tro­duced the Free­dom Act late last year in an at­tempt to re­strict the gov­ern­ment’s wide in­ter­pret­a­tion of sec­tion 215 of the post-Sept. 11 Pat­ri­ot Act, which he also sponsored.

The NSA has been un­der siege since Ed­ward Snowden began leak­ing last June a de­luge of doc­u­ments re­veal­ing the size and scope of the agency’s bulk col­lec­tion of do­mest­ic and in­ter­na­tion­al phone and In­ter­net data. Last week, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., asked the gov­ern­ment in sharply worded let­ter wheth­er the NSA was spy­ing on mem­bers of Con­gress. The NSA is­sued a re­sponse over the week­end say­ing they were re­view­ing the in­quiry.

The Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee has sched­uled a hear­ing for Jan. 14 with all five mem­bers of the pres­id­ent’s sur­veil­lance re­view board to dis­cuss its pro­posed re­form meas­ures.

Contributions by Stacy Kaper

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.