Obama Invites NSA’s Top Congressional Critics to Meet at White House

Thursday’s meeting is by invitation only and staffers are banned from attending.

Demonstrators hold up a placard in support of former US agent of the National Security Agency, Edward Snowden in front of Berlin's landmark Brandenburg Gate as they take part in a protest against the U.S. National Security Agency.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Jan. 7, 2014, 8:12 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama will sum­mon key law­makers to the White House on Thursday to dis­cuss the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s con­tro­ver­sial spy­ing pro­grams, ac­cord­ing to staffers.

Con­gres­sion­al aides said that the meet­ing’s at­tend­ance will be small, in­clud­ing only Pres­id­ent Obama, seni­or White House staff, and the chair­men and rank­ing mem­bers of each cham­ber’s Ju­di­ciary and In­tel­li­gence com­mit­tees. Also in­vited are a few “key play­ers,” staffers say, such as Demo­crat­ic Sens. Mark Ud­all and Ron Wyden and Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner — a trio that has been par­tic­u­larly crit­ic­al of the NSA’s data-gath­er­ing ef­forts.

The meet­ing is by in­vit­a­tion only and staffers are banned from at­tend­ing, ac­cord­ing to the aides.

Sen. Di­anne Fein­stein, the Cali­for­nia Demo­crat who chairs the Sen­ate Se­lect Com­mit­tee on In­tel­li­gence, con­firmed on Tues­day that she would at­tend the meet­ing.

A sep­ar­ate meet­ing is planned for Wed­nes­day in the Situ­ation Room between rel­ev­ant White House aides and con­gres­sion­al staffers.

It re­mains un­clear pre­cisely what Obama wants to dis­cuss, but one aide ex­pec­ted him to of­fer some re­forms in an at­tempt to garner sup­port from the law­makers. Oth­ers view the meet­ing as curs­ory, an at­tempt to check the “met with law­makers” box be­fore an­noun­cing any pro­posed changes to the NSA.

Sen. Richard Blu­menth­al, D-Conn., a key ad­voc­ate of tak­ing away the NSA’s mass sur­veil­lance powers, said Tues­day that he is op­tim­ist­ic the ad­min­is­tra­tion is tak­ing pos­it­ive steps for­ward.

“The pres­id­ent is go­ing to be hav­ing some meet­ings, I un­der­stand. He’s go­ing to be ob­vi­ously com­ing out with some of his po­s­i­tions,” he said. “I think we’ll know more by the end of the week.”

But staffers close to oth­er law­makers ex­pressed skep­ti­cism that Obama would enu­mer­ate spe­cif­ic re­forms Thursday. “I do not think this ad­min­is­tra­tion will turn this pro­gram off,” a Demo­crat­ic staffer said, re­fer­ring to the NSA’s sweep­ing col­lec­tion of tele­phone metadata. “That will re­quire con­gres­sion­al ac­tion.”

Earli­er re­ports in­dic­ate Obama is pre­par­ing to an­nounce a slew of in­tel­li­gence re­forms ahead of his State of the Uni­on ad­dress on Jan. 28. Ex­pec­ted changes in­clude pla­cing a pub­lic ad­voc­ate with­in the secret For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court, which cur­rently only hears from gov­ern­ment law­yers re­quest­ing sur­veil­lance au­thor­ity, and trans­fer­ring con­trol of the NSA’s tele­phone metadata re­cords to private phone com­pan­ies from which the gov­ern­ment could is­sue data re­quests.

Obama has said he would re­view a pres­id­en­tial task force’s list of 46 re­com­men­ded changes and “make a pretty defin­it­ive state­ment about all of this in Janu­ary.” He re­peatedly re­buffed cri­ti­cism of the agency’s bulk data col­lec­tion, say­ing, “I have con­fid­ence that the NSA is not en­ga­ging in do­mest­ic sur­veil­lance and not snoop­ing around,” but con­ced­ing that more needs to be done to re­store pub­lic con­fid­ence in the pro­grams.

Sensen­bren­ner in­tro­duced the Free­dom Act late last year in an at­tempt to re­strict the gov­ern­ment’s wide in­ter­pret­a­tion of sec­tion 215 of the post-Sept. 11 Pat­ri­ot Act, which he also sponsored.

The NSA has been un­der siege since Ed­ward Snowden began leak­ing last June a de­luge of doc­u­ments re­veal­ing the size and scope of the agency’s bulk col­lec­tion of do­mest­ic and in­ter­na­tion­al phone and In­ter­net data. Last week, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., asked the gov­ern­ment in sharply worded let­ter wheth­er the NSA was spy­ing on mem­bers of Con­gress. The NSA is­sued a re­sponse over the week­end say­ing they were re­view­ing the in­quiry.

The Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee has sched­uled a hear­ing for Jan. 14 with all five mem­bers of the pres­id­ent’s sur­veil­lance re­view board to dis­cuss its pro­posed re­form meas­ures.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4631) }}

Stacy Kaper contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
OTHER SECRETARIES AT FAULT, TOO
State Dept. Review Faults Clinton Email Management
17 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"A State Department audit has faulted Hillary Clinton and previous secretaries of state for poorly managing email and other computer information and slowly responding to new cybersecurity risks. ... It cites 'longstanding, systemic weaknesses' related to communications. These started before Clinton's appointment as secretary of state, but her failures were singled out as more serious."

Source:
CRUZ STILL TOOK DELEGATES AT THE CONVENTION
Trump Rolls in Washington Primary
34 minutes ago
THE LATEST

Donald Trump "was on course to win more than three-quarters of the vote in Washington's primary" last night. Ted Cruz's defunct candidacy still pulled about 10 percent. "Cruz dropped out of the race on May 3, but won 40 of the state's 41 delegates up for grabs at last weekend's state GOP convention."

Source:
MULTIPLE OFFICERS INJURED
Trump Rally Turns Violent in New Mexico
58 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

"What started as a calm protest outside Donald Trump’s rally Tuesday erupted into fiery violence as protesters jumped on police cars, smashed windows and fought with Trump supporters and police. Police faced such an angry crowd that they called in reinforcements from around the state, seeking to double their numbers to counter the protesters, whose numbers swelled beyond 600." Protesters threw rocks and bottles at police, who broke up several fights. 

Source:
‘LOTS OF MEETINGS’
Hill Dems Mull Dropping Wasserman Schultz
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Concerned that she's become too divisive, "Democrats on Capitol Hill are discussing whether Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should step down as Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman before the party’s national convention in July. ... Wasserman Schultz has had an increasingly acrimonious relationship with the party’s other presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, and his supporters, who argue she has tilted the scales in Clinton’s favor." The money quote, from a Democratic senator who backs Clinton: “There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on." Meanwhile, Newsweek takes a look at why no one seems to like Wasserman Schultz.

Source:
PRESIDENT PLEDGES VETO
House Votes Today on Bill to Strip Budget Autonomy from DC
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The U.S. House of Representatives plans to vote Wednesday on a Republican bill that would block the District of Columbia from spending locally raised tax revenue without congressional approval, prompting President Obama to pledge to veto it. In issuing the veto threat on Tuesday, the Obama White House made one of the strongest statements to date in support of the District’s attempt to win financial independence from Congress."

Source:
×