Capitol Hill is holding its own version of Fight Club Wednesday, as a small number of hand-picked intelligence staffers are descending on the White House this afternoon for a top-secret meeting to talk about government surveillance reform.
No one appears to know exactly what the meeting will entail or whether the administration will unveil any offerings about restricting the National Security Administration’s much-maligned telephone and Internet data-gathering techniques. And attendees are being warned to not divulge any of the sensitive information after the huddle-up, continuing a trend of keeping NSA reform talks in the shadows even as critics deride the government for failing to be more transparent about the agency’s surveillance activities.
The Situation Room meeting, ahead of an even more tightly guarded one between President Obama and select lawmakers Thursday morning in the Oval Office, has a TS/SCI (top secret/sensitive compartmented information) clearance ranking, meaning the conversation is highly classified. As recently as Wednesday morning, some intelligence staffers said they were unclear exactly who had been extended an invitation or if they would even be allowed in the room.
The meetings come as Obama is signaling an interest in announcing some level of reform measures before his State of the Union Address on Jan. 28. Any restrictions on NSA surveillance would be the first since revelations of the agency’s sweeping domestic and international data-gathering programs began surfacing.
White House press secretary Jay Carney said Monday that Obama had given his surveillance review task force’s recommendation “a great deal of consideration” and reviewed its report during his Hawaii vacation.
Obama “has instituted a review about the NSA procedures and broader issues that encompasses both the review group as well as other elements,” Carney said. “We know with confidence that the president will have made some decisions about which recommendations he wants to implement, which require further review, and which we will not implement, and you will hear him discuss those issues later this month.”
The Los Angeles Times reported last week that Obama intends to present a package deal that would concede to some of the 46 recommendations released recently by the president’s hand-picked five-member intelligence review board. Big-ticket changes could include placing a public advocate within the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and removing the government’s direct control of the NSA’s telephone metadata records. Instead, the database could be maintained by telephone companies or by some other, as-yet undefined, entity.
But privacy advocates remain skeptical that Obama intends to make any serious changes to the NSA, as he reupped his defense of bulk telephone and Internet metadata collection at his year-end press conference last month as a “useful tool … to ensure that if we have a thread on a potential terrorist threat, that that can be followed effectively.”
Obama’s schedule this week also includes a meeting with the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. In addition, some technology groups have been invited to the White House for a follow-up to Obama’s meeting in December with high-wattage technology executives.
What We're Following See More »
Instead of his usual stump speech, Bernie Sanders tonight threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, providing a clear contrast between Clinton and GOP nominee Donald Trump on the many issues he used to discuss in his campaign stump speeches. Sanders spoke glowingly about the presumptive Democratic nominee, lauding her work as first lady and as a strong advocate for women and the poor. “We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he said. “Hillary Clinton will make a great president, and I am proud to stand with her tonight."
In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.
"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.
Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.
The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."