POLITICAL CONNECTIONS

Trump Has Brexit-Style Voters, But Not Enough of Them

The U.S. shares the U.K.’s economic and demographic anxieties, but a smaller proportion of whites will prevent a political earthquake.

Donald Trump speaking last month in Lynden, Wash.
AP Photo/Elaine Thompson
Ronald Brownstein
Add to Briefcase
Ronald Brownstein
June 29, 2016, 8 p.m.

When United King­dom voters last week ap­proved a ref­er­en­dum to leave the European Uni­on, they un­der­scored how an era of un­re­lent­ing eco­nom­ic and demo­graph­ic change is shift­ing the ax­is of polit­ics across much of the in­dus­tri­al­ized world from class to cul­ture.

Con­trary to much ini­tial spec­u­la­tion, the vic­tory for the U.K. “Leave” cam­paign didn’t point to­ward vic­tory in the U.S. pres­id­en­tial elec­tion for Don­ald Trump, who is voicing very sim­il­ar ar­gu­ments against glob­al­iz­a­tion and im­mig­ra­tion; the Brit­ish res­ults, in fact, poin­ted up the obstacles fa­cing his agenda of de­fens­ive na­tion­al­ism in the vastly more di­verse U.S. elect­or­ate.

But the Brexit ref­er­en­dum did crys­tal­lize deep­en­ing cul­tur­al fault lines in U.K. polit­ics that are also likely to shape the con­test between Trump and Hil­lary Clin­ton. In that way, the res­ults pre­fig­ure both a con­tinu­ing long-term re­align­ment in the elect­or­al base of each Amer­ic­an party—and a pos­sible near-term re­shuffle of the tip­ping-point states in pres­id­en­tial polit­ics.

Both geo­graph­ic­ally and demo­graph­ic­ally, the Brit­ish ref­er­en­dum split the U.K. along lines fa­mil­i­ar in Amer­ica. An ex­tens­ive Elec­tion Day sur­vey by Lord Mi­chael Ash­croft, a Brit­ish poll­ster, found that the “Leave” cam­paign car­ried over three-fifths of those without four-year col­lege de­grees, a com­par­able num­ber of seni­ors, and a nar­row ma­jor­ity of all whites. Elec­tion res­ults showed the cam­paign amass­ing big mar­gins out­side of ma­jor cit­ies. The cam­paign to re­main won over two-thirds of non­whites, about three-fifths of col­lege gradu­ates, and big ma­jor­it­ies among young­er and urb­an voters. In Lon­don, which re­cently elec­ted one of the West­ern world’s first Muslim may­ors, 60 per­cent voted to stay.

All of this rep­lic­ates Amer­ic­an pat­terns. Demo­crats now rely on an urb­an­ized co­ali­tion of mil­len­ni­als, minor­it­ies, and so­cially lib­er­al col­lege-edu­cated and single whites (es­pe­cially wo­men). Re­pub­lic­ans thrive among older, non-col­lege-edu­cated and re­li­giously de­vout whites, es­pe­cially out­side of ma­jor cit­ies. In 2012, Pres­id­ent Obama car­ried less than one-fourth of Amer­ica’s counties; he won few­er counties than any pres­id­en­tial win­ner since at least 1920. But be­cause Obama so dom­in­ated the na­tion’s pop­u­la­tion cen­ters, he tri­umphed by 5 mil­lion votes.

Not only was the dis­tri­bu­tion of the Brit­ish vote fa­mil­i­ar, so was the mo­tiv­a­tion. Ash­croft’s poll found that Leave voters were char­ac­ter­ized by pess­im­ism about the next gen­er­a­tion’s eco­nom­ic pro­spects, and deep hos­til­ity to im­mig­ra­tion, mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism, and the chan­ging role of wo­men. Fully 80 per­cent of Leave voters said im­mig­ra­tion neg­at­ively af­fected the U.K. That ex­actly equaled the per­cent­age of Trump sup­port­ers who called im­mig­ra­tion more a bur­den than be­ne­fit in a ma­jor new na­tion­al poll. Stan­ley Green­berg, a long­time poll­ster both for U.S. Demo­crats and the U.K. La­bour Party, says a post-ref­er­en­dum sur­vey he con­duc­ted for the Brit­ish Trades Uni­on Con­gress found that among those who voted to leave, “the biggest ra­tionale, and the strongest ar­gu­ments, were op­pos­i­tion to im­mig­ra­tion.”

In these ways, the Brit­ish vote showed the power of the Trump-like anti-im­mig­ra­tion, anti-glob­al­iz­a­tion ar­gu­ment for white, older, non­urb­an, and non-col­lege-edu­cated voters who feel mar­gin­al­ized by eco­nom­ic and cul­tur­al change. The key dif­fer­ence is that those voters rep­res­ent much less of the U.S. elect­or­ate. In par­tic­u­lar, while whites com­prised about 90 per­cent of Brit­ish voters, they will likely cast only around 70 per­cent of Amer­ic­an bal­lots. In the U.K., Ash­croft found 53 per­cent of whites voted to leave; be­cause Trump faces so much op­pos­i­tion from minor­it­ies, if he wins the same per­cent­age of whites he will lose in a land­slide. He will likely need well over 60 per­cent of whites to win.

If any­thing, the res­ist­ance to the Leave cam­paign’s nativ­ism from col­lege-edu­cated and urb­an U.K. whites un­der­lined the head­winds Trump will face reach­ing that num­ber. Since 2000, every Demo­crat­ic pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate has run bet­ter among col­lege-edu­cated than non-col­lege-edu­cated whites. But even so, in mod­ern polling tra­cing back to 1952, no Demo­crat­ic pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate has ever car­ried most of those col­lege-edu­cated whites. Yet the last five na­tion­al sur­veys have shown Clin­ton lead­ing Trump among this group. Green­berg pre­dicts that as the GOP is tugged more to­ward the res­ist­ance to im­mig­ra­tion (and di­versity more broadly) by its cul­tur­ally con­ser­vat­ive blue-col­lar wing, more col­lege-edu­cated voters will de­fect, per­haps last­ingly. “They drove their col­lege-edu­cated voters out by the nature of this primary,” he said.

Re­volving around these cul­tur­al dif­fer­ences, the Trump-Clin­ton con­test seems cer­tain to ac­cel­er­ate the two parties’ long-term re-sort­ing in­to a cos­mo­pol­it­an, urb­an-centered Demo­crat­ic co­ali­tion com­fort­able with demo­graph­ic and cul­tur­al changes and a primar­ily non­urb­an tra­di­tion­al­ist Re­pub­lic­an co­ali­tion mostly res­ist­ant to them. That on­go­ing shift’s ef­fect in 2016 may be to re­order the states at the tip­ping point of U.S. elec­tions.

Since 1992, Demo­crats have run bet­ter in older and heav­ily white work­ing-class Rust Belt swing states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wis­con­sin, Ohio, and Iowa than in young­er and di­verse Sun Belt swing states in­clud­ing Vir­gin­ia, North Car­o­lina, Flor­ida, Col­or­ado, and Nevada. (Over those six elec­tions, Demo­crats have won those Rust Belt states a com­bined 27 times out of 30 chances and the Sun Belt battle­grounds only 13.) But many signs sug­gest that align­ment may start to in­vert this year. With its big His­pan­ic pop­u­la­tion, Flor­ida could be bet­ter ter­rain for Clin­ton than largely blue-col­lar Ohio or even Pennsylvania. And her cam­paign is in­tensely fo­cused on North Car­o­lina, which has voted Demo­crat­ic only once since 1992, while Trump sup­port­ers al­most uni­ver­sally agree that any plaus­ible path to the White House runs through the Rust Belt states Demo­crats have dom­in­ated since then.

The Brexit vote poin­ted to a re­shaped U.K. polit­ic­al or­der that re­volves more around cul­tur­al af­fin­it­ies—par­tic­u­larly at­ti­tudes to­ward im­mig­ra­tion and di­versity—than eco­nom­ic class. The Clin­ton-Trump race is poised to fast-for­ward that same shift across the At­lantic.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
53 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
1 days ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
1 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
2 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login