Conservative Group Drops W.Va. Ads Against Rahall

American Energy Alliance will instead help families cope with chemical spill.

Fairly or not, Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., is being labeled anti-coal as he gears up for re-election.
National Journal
Amy Harder
Add to Briefcase
Amy Harder
Jan. 13, 2014, 7:56 a.m.

The con­ser­vat­ive group Amer­ic­an En­ergy Al­li­ance is pulling TV and ra­dio ads at­tack­ing Demo­crat­ic Rep. Nick Ra­hall of West Viri­gin­ia as the Moun­tain State struggles to get safe wa­ter back to al­most 300,000 people — more than 15 per­cent of its pop­u­la­tion — after a chem­ic­al spill last week.

“Giv­en the more press­ing con­cern fa­cing West Vir­gini­ans as a res­ult of the re­cent chem­ic­al spill in the Elk River, the Amer­ic­an En­ergy Al­li­ance is pulling our three-week ini­ti­at­ive to pro­mote ac­count­ab­il­ity for Rep. Nick Ra­hall over his vote to sup­port a car­bon tax,” said AEA Pres­id­ent Tom Pyle.

He went on to say that the group, which is backed by fossil-fuel com­pan­ies and the con­ser­vat­ive Koch broth­ers, will in­stead help the state’s res­id­ents. “While we re­main staunchly op­posed to a car­bon tax and com­mit­ted to hold­ing pub­lic of­fi­cials ac­count­able, now is not the time for this ad­vert­ise­ment. Our ef­forts in the next sev­er­al weeks in West Vir­gin­ia are more rightly dir­ec­ted at help­ing fam­il­ies in the af­fected re­gion.”

Ra­hall is con­sidered one of the most vul­ner­able law­makers up for reelec­tion this cycle. He is one of the last re­main­ing Demo­crats in a state that has been trend­ing red in re­cent years, due in part to tough­er en­vir­on­ment­al reg­u­la­tions tar­get­ing coal, a bed­rock in­dustry for the state. The spill was caused by a chem­ic­al that is used to clean coal be­fore it goes to mar­ket. On Monday, West Vir­gin­ia Gov. Earl Tomblin an­nounced that the tap-wa­ter ban is be­ing lif­ted for parts of the state, ac­cord­ing to AP.

AEA spokes­man Ben Cole said they’re still de­cid­ing wheth­er they will run this par­tic­u­lar ad against Ra­hall in the fu­ture, or wheth­er they will air a dif­fer­ent one once the state re­cov­ers from the chem­ic­al spill.

What We're Following See More »
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
22 minutes ago

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

Obama Compares Peres to ‘Giants of the 20th Century’
40 minutes ago

Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.

How Many New Voters Does the Clinton Campaign Aim to Register?
48 minutes ago

Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."

Chicago Tribune Endorses Johnson
1 hours ago

In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.

USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
14 hours ago

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."