The conservative group American Energy Alliance is pulling TV and radio ads attacking Democratic Rep. Nick Rahall of West Viriginia as the Mountain State struggles to get safe water back to almost 300,000 people — more than 15 percent of its population — after a chemical spill last week.
“Given the more pressing concern facing West Virginians as a result of the recent chemical spill in the Elk River, the American Energy Alliance is pulling our three-week initiative to promote accountability for Rep. Nick Rahall over his vote to support a carbon tax,” said AEA President Tom Pyle.
He went on to say that the group, which is backed by fossil-fuel companies and the conservative Koch brothers, will instead help the state’s residents. “While we remain staunchly opposed to a carbon tax and committed to holding public officials accountable, now is not the time for this advertisement. Our efforts in the next several weeks in West Virginia are more rightly directed at helping families in the affected region.”
Rahall is considered one of the most vulnerable lawmakers up for reelection this cycle. He is one of the last remaining Democrats in a state that has been trending red in recent years, due in part to tougher environmental regulations targeting coal, a bedrock industry for the state. The spill was caused by a chemical that is used to clean coal before it goes to market. On Monday, West Virginia Gov. Earl Tomblin announced that the tap-water ban is being lifted for parts of the state, according to AP.
AEA spokesman Ben Cole said they’re still deciding whether they will run this particular ad against Rahall in the future, or whether they will air a different one once the state recovers from the chemical spill.
What We're Following See More »
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.
Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."
In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."