A top House Democrat is urging the chamber’s GOP majority to hold a hearing on the West Virginia chemical spill that left hundreds of thousands of people unable to use tap water in recent days.
The request from Rep. Henry Waxman, the top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, shows that the accident will likely influence political battles over the scope of federal chemical regulation.
“Late last week, residents of nine counties in West Virginia learned that their water supply had been contaminated with a toxic chemical for which emergency responders and regulators had precious little information,” the California Democrat and a colleague said in a letter Monday.
“We are writing to request that you immediately schedule a hearing to examine the regulatory gaps that this incident has exposed in the nation’s toxic-chemical-control laws,” adds the letter from Waxman to Rep. John Shimkus, R-Ill., chairman of the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy.
A spokeswoman for Energy and Commerce Committee Republicans, in a statement, did not say directly whether a hearing would occur.
“The committee is actively monitoring the federal investigation and working to fully obtain the facts surrounding the situation,” spokeswoman Charlotte Baker said.
Efforts to toughen Environmental Protection Agency chemical oversight under the Toxic Substances Control Act have failed to advance on Capitol Hill for years, but some environmentalists are using the accident to revive calls to strengthen the law.
The letter from Waxman and Rep. Paul Tonko, D-N.Y., urges Shimkus to hold a hearing on the spill and “its relevance to the committee’s consideration of TSCA reform legislation.”
West Virginia officials began lifting water use restrictions Monday, five days after a chemical used in coal processing called 4-methylcyclohexane methanol seeped into the Elk River from a plant in Charleston.
- 1 Views of Homosexuality Differ Greatly by Region
- 2 Congress Passed a Cell-Phone Unlocking Bill. But It Won’t Do Much.
- 3 The Fight for a Smaller, Stronger Republican Study Committee
- 4 Wednesday Q+A with Ann Selzer
- 5 Smart Ideas: The Debate as a Microcosm of 2016, the Demise of North Korea, and the Libertarian Party’s Ceiling
What We're Following See More »
"Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will score another high-powered Republican endorsement on Wednesday, according to a campaign aide: retired senator John Warner of Virginia, a popular GOP maverick with renowned military credentials."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday "heard several hours of oral arguments" over the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan rules. The 10-judge panel "focused much of their questioning on whether the EPA had overstepped its legal authority by seeking to broadly compel this shift away from coal, a move the EPA calls the Best System of Emission Reduction, or BSER. The states and companies suing the EPA argue the agency doesn’t have the authority to regulate anything outside of a power plant itself."
"Spending by super PACs tied to Donald Trump friends such as Ben Carson and banker Andy Beal will help make this week the general election's most expensive yet. Republicans and Democrats will spend almost $28 million on radio and television this week, according to advertising records, as Trump substantially increases his advertising buy for the final stretch. He's spending $6.4 million in nine states, part of what aides have said will be a $100 million television campaign through Election Day."
Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.