Time has been a friend to D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray’s reelection hopes.
A new Washington Post poll shows the incumbent mayor of the capital city on top of the crowded Democratic field, with nearly double the percentage of the closest challenger.
A year ago, it looked like Gray was doomed if he were to seek reelection. Voters didn’t show confidence in the District’s future, nor were they confident in the mayor’s ethics following a 2010 campaign finance scandal.
But now, the number of voters that consider Gray honest and trustworthy has gone up 10 percentage points since the last poll in July 2012, up to 32 percent. Still, 54 percent say he is untrustworthy. But the uptick in positive feelings is an improvement nevertheless.
As is the number of voters who think that D.C. is generally going in the right direction, polling at 59 percent. That number in 2012 was at 40 percent. More than half the voters say Gray is doing an excellent or good job at attracting new business to the District, reducing crime in the city, and improving city services. However, only 38 percent of voters think the mayor is doing a good job at improving public schools.
Still, the 2010 scandal is on the minds of 43 percent of voters, who say it will be a major factor at the ballot. That’s a number that the large field of candidates might be able to work with during the April 1 primary.
The nearest challenger is former Adrian Fenty confidante Muriel Bowser, sitting at second place with 12 percent of the vote. The two major white candidates for mayor are just behind the councilwoman with 11 percent each: Councilmen Jack Evans and Tommy Wells.
Twenty-three percent of voters either have no opinion or do not support the field, and these people may be the voters who sway the election.
As for now, however, it does look like the District’s economic improvements and Gray’s name recognition might help the incumbent win a second term, despite the scandal that once shook voters’ confidence.
What We're Following See More »
The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."
Donald Trump's "transition team will meet next week with representatives of the tech industry, multiple sources confirmed, even as their candidate largely has been largely shunned by Silicon Valley. The meeting, scheduled for next Thursday at the offices of law and lobbying firm BakerHostetler, will include trade groups like the Information Technology Industry Council and the Internet Association that represent major Silicon Valley companies."
Today in bad news for Donald Trump:
- Newsweek found that a company he controlled did business with Cuba under Fidel Castro "despite strict American trade bans that made such undertakings illegal, according to interviews with former Trump executives, internal company records and court filings." In 1998, he spent at least $68,000 there, which was funneled through a consluting company "to make it appear legal."
- The Los Angeles Times reports that at a golf club he owns in California, Trump ordered that unattractive female staff be fired and replaced with prettier women.