WikiLeaks Claims NSA Is Recording ‘Nearly All’ of Afghanistan’s Phone Calls

Journalists had previously refused to identify “˜Country X’ due to concerns for national security.

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Dustin Volz
May 23, 2014, 8:37 a.m.

The Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency has been re­cord­ing and archiv­ing “nearly all” do­mest­ic and in­ter­na­tion­al phone calls in Afgh­anistan as of last year, ac­cord­ing to the an­ti­se­crecy web­site WikiLeaks.

Fol­low­ing through on a prom­ise made earli­er in the week, WikiLeaks re­vealed Fri­day the iden­tity of what it says is “Coun­try X,” a pre­vi­ously un­named coun­try that journ­al­ism re­ports have said was sub­ject to an NSA sur­veil­lance pro­gram that al­lows agents to listen in to the en­tirety of its tele­phone con­ver­sa­tions.

The coun­try’s iden­tity had been cen­sored by mul­tiple journ­al­ism out­lets be­cause of re­quests from U.S. in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cials, who claimed its dis­clos­ure could sig­ni­fic­antly jeop­ard­ize na­tion­al se­cur­ity and lead to deaths.

But WikiLeaks, which is known for an ag­gress­ive dis­clos­ure policy that rarely fa­vors re­dac­tion, dis­missed such con­cerns.

“Both The Wash­ing­ton Post and The In­ter­cept stated that they had cen­sored the name of the vic­tim coun­try at the re­quest of the U.S. gov­ern­ment,” WikiLeaks said in a state­ment. “By deny­ing an en­tire pop­u­la­tion the know­ledge of its own vic­tim­iz­a­tion, this act of cen­sor­ship denies each in­di­vidu­al in that coun­try the op­por­tun­ity to seek an ef­fect­ive rem­edy, wheth­er in in­ter­na­tion­al courts, or else­where.”

If true, the dis­clos­ure that the U.S. gov­ern­ment is able to listen to al­most any phone con­ver­sa­tion in Afgh­anistan could have sub­stan­tial rami­fic­a­tions for in­ter­na­tion­al re­la­tions.

The pro­gram in ques­tion is code­named MYS­TIC and was formed in 2009 to al­low NSA ana­lysts to re­wind and play back phone con­ver­sa­tions tak­ing place with­in the pre­vi­ous 30 days. The pro­gram has been de­scribed by one of­fi­cial as a “time ma­chine” that opens a “door in­to the past,” al­low­ing a full re­play of the voices on any giv­en call, without the need for pri­or iden­ti­fic­a­tion of those on the line.

Earli­er in the week, WikiLeaks began a heated de­bate on Twit­ter with journ­al­ist Glenn Gre­en­wald, a con­fid­ant of NSA whistle-blower Ed­ward Snowden. Gre­en­wald is be­lieved to be one of only two people to pos­sess all of the Snowden files. WikiLeaks took is­sue with a new re­port from The In­ter­cept, Gre­en­wald’s new journ­al­ism en­deavor, that re­vealed that the U.S. was cov­ertly re­cord­ing the con­ver­sa­tions of “vir­tu­ally every cell­phone con­ver­sa­tion” in the Ba­hamas, in ad­di­tion to its con­tent-va­cu­um­ing ef­forts in Coun­try X.

Ig­nor­ing pleas from Gre­en­wald that he and his fel­low journ­al­ists were “very con­vinced” that nam­ing the coun­try would lead to deaths, WikiLeaks ab­ruptly threatened to dis­close its iden­tity.

It re­mains un­clear how the web­site would pos­sess such top-secret in­form­a­tion. On Fri­day, it re­fused to give fur­ther de­tail.

“Al­though, for reas­ons of source pro­tec­tion we can­not dis­close how, WikiLeaks has con­firmed that the iden­tity of vic­tim state is Afgh­anistan,” WikiLeaks wrote. “This can also be in­de­pend­ently veri­fied through forensic scru­tiny of im­per­fectly ap­plied cen­sor­ship on re­lated doc­u­ments re­leased to date and cor­rel­a­tions with oth­er NSA pro­grams.”

The NSA did not im­me­di­ately re­spond to a re­quest for com­ment. But in a state­ment provided to Na­tion­al Journ­al in March, the agency said it “does not con­duct sig­nals in­tel­li­gence col­lec­tion in any coun­try, or any­where in the world, un­less it is ne­ces­sary to ad­vance U.S. na­tion­al se­cur­ity and for­eign policy in­terests.”

Gre­en­wald and oth­er journ­al­ists with know­ledge of the NSA’s clas­si­fied pro­grams have not yet com­men­ted on the vera­city of WikiLeaks’s nam­ing of Afgh­anistan.

What We're Following See More »
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
41 minutes ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

FULL CABINET IN PLACE
Acosta Confirmed As Labor Secretary
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Alexander Acosta was confirmed Thursday night as Labor secretary, officially filling out President Trump's cabinet on day 98 of his presidency. Nine Democrats joined every present Republican in voting to approve Acosta, with the final tally at 60-38. Trump's first choice for Labor secretary, Andrew Puzder, withdrew his nomination after taking criticism for hiring undocumented workers and for other matters in his personal life.

Source:
HAS WHITE HOUSE BACKING
Hurd to Make Push on Federal IT
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Rep. Will Hurd (R-TX) plans to introduce legislation today designed to help federal agencies update their aging technology—and this time, it has White House backing. Hurd worked alongside White House Office of American Innovation officials Reed Cordish and Chris Liddell in crafting and tweaking the legislation, and called their partnership an 'invaluable' part of the process."

Source:
2,300 JOBS ON THE CHOPPING BLOCK
Tillerson Looking to Slash 9% of State Dept. Workforce
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The State Department plans to cut 2,300 U.S. diplomats and civil servants—about 9 percent of the Americans in its workforce worldwide—as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson presses ahead with his task of slashing the agency’s budget, according to people familiar with the matter. The majority of the job cuts, about 1,700, will come through attrition, while the remaining 600 will be done via buyouts."

Source:
LIKELY PAVES WAY FOR BUDGET CR
No ACA Vote This Week
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Despite pressure from the White House, House GOP leaders determined Thursday night that they didn’t have the votes to pass a rewrite of the Affordable Care Act and would not seek to put their proposal on the floor on Friday. A late push to act on health care had threatened the bipartisan deal to keep the government open for one week while lawmakers crafted a longer-term spending deal. Now, members are likely to approve the short-term spending bill when it comes to the floor and keep the government open past midnight on Friday."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login