WikiLeaks Claims NSA Is Recording ‘Nearly All’ of Afghanistan’s Phone Calls

Journalists had previously refused to identify “˜Country X’ due to concerns for national security.

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Dustin Volz
May 23, 2014, 8:37 a.m.

The Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency has been re­cord­ing and archiv­ing “nearly all” do­mest­ic and in­ter­na­tion­al phone calls in Afgh­anistan as of last year, ac­cord­ing to the an­ti­se­crecy web­site WikiLeaks.

Fol­low­ing through on a prom­ise made earli­er in the week, WikiLeaks re­vealed Fri­day the iden­tity of what it says is “Coun­try X,” a pre­vi­ously un­named coun­try that journ­al­ism re­ports have said was sub­ject to an NSA sur­veil­lance pro­gram that al­lows agents to listen in to the en­tirety of its tele­phone con­ver­sa­tions.

The coun­try’s iden­tity had been cen­sored by mul­tiple journ­al­ism out­lets be­cause of re­quests from U.S. in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cials, who claimed its dis­clos­ure could sig­ni­fic­antly jeop­ard­ize na­tion­al se­cur­ity and lead to deaths.

But WikiLeaks, which is known for an ag­gress­ive dis­clos­ure policy that rarely fa­vors re­dac­tion, dis­missed such con­cerns.

“Both The Wash­ing­ton Post and The In­ter­cept stated that they had cen­sored the name of the vic­tim coun­try at the re­quest of the U.S. gov­ern­ment,” WikiLeaks said in a state­ment. “By deny­ing an en­tire pop­u­la­tion the know­ledge of its own vic­tim­iz­a­tion, this act of cen­sor­ship denies each in­di­vidu­al in that coun­try the op­por­tun­ity to seek an ef­fect­ive rem­edy, wheth­er in in­ter­na­tion­al courts, or else­where.”

If true, the dis­clos­ure that the U.S. gov­ern­ment is able to listen to al­most any phone con­ver­sa­tion in Afgh­anistan could have sub­stan­tial rami­fic­a­tions for in­ter­na­tion­al re­la­tions.

The pro­gram in ques­tion is code­named MYS­TIC and was formed in 2009 to al­low NSA ana­lysts to re­wind and play back phone con­ver­sa­tions tak­ing place with­in the pre­vi­ous 30 days. The pro­gram has been de­scribed by one of­fi­cial as a “time ma­chine” that opens a “door in­to the past,” al­low­ing a full re­play of the voices on any giv­en call, without the need for pri­or iden­ti­fic­a­tion of those on the line.

Earli­er in the week, WikiLeaks began a heated de­bate on Twit­ter with journ­al­ist Glenn Gre­en­wald, a con­fid­ant of NSA whistle-blower Ed­ward Snowden. Gre­en­wald is be­lieved to be one of only two people to pos­sess all of the Snowden files. WikiLeaks took is­sue with a new re­port from The In­ter­cept, Gre­en­wald’s new journ­al­ism en­deavor, that re­vealed that the U.S. was cov­ertly re­cord­ing the con­ver­sa­tions of “vir­tu­ally every cell­phone con­ver­sa­tion” in the Ba­hamas, in ad­di­tion to its con­tent-va­cu­um­ing ef­forts in Coun­try X.

Ig­nor­ing pleas from Gre­en­wald that he and his fel­low journ­al­ists were “very con­vinced” that nam­ing the coun­try would lead to deaths, WikiLeaks ab­ruptly threatened to dis­close its iden­tity.

Ig­nor­ing pleas from Gre­en­wald that he and his fel­low journ­al­ists were “very con­vinced” that nam­ing the coun­try would lead to deaths, WikiLeaks ab­ruptly threatened to dis­close its iden­tity.

It re­mains un­clear how the web­site would pos­sess such top-secret in­form­a­tion. On Fri­day, it re­fused to give fur­ther de­tail.

“Al­though, for reas­ons of source pro­tec­tion we can­not dis­close how, WikiLeaks has con­firmed that the iden­tity of vic­tim state is Afgh­anistan,” WikiLeaks wrote. “This can also be in­de­pend­ently veri­fied through forensic scru­tiny of im­per­fectly ap­plied cen­sor­ship on re­lated doc­u­ments re­leased to date and cor­rel­a­tions with oth­er NSA pro­grams.”

The NSA did not im­me­di­ately re­spond to a re­quest for com­ment. But in a state­ment provided to Na­tion­al Journ­al in March, the agency said it “does not con­duct sig­nals in­tel­li­gence col­lec­tion in any coun­try, or any­where in the world, un­less it is ne­ces­sary to ad­vance U.S. na­tion­al se­cur­ity and for­eign policy in­terests.”

Gre­en­wald and oth­er journ­al­ists with know­ledge of the NSA’s clas­si­fied pro­grams have not yet com­men­ted on the vera­city of WikiLeaks’s nam­ing of Afgh­anistan.

What We're Following See More »
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
19 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
30 minutes ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
HAS BEEN OFF OF NEWSCASTS FOR A WEEK
For First Debate, Holt Called on NBC Experts for Prep
42 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.

Source:
WHITE HOUSE PROMISES VETO
House Votes to Bar Cash Payments to Iran
56 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."

Source:
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
56 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
×