Judge: Arguing NSA Privacy Concerns in Court Is ‘Unnecessary’

A sign stands outside the National Security Administration (NSA) campus in Fort Meade, Md., Thursday, June 6, 2013.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
Jan. 14, 2014, 10:29 a.m.

Placing a privacy advocate on the judicial body responsible for approving the National Security Agency’s foreign surveillance orders is “unnecessary” and potentially “counterproductive,” a federal district court judge wrote to Congress this week.

The judge’s comments come amid a debate concerning the proper role of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which oversees the government’s surveillance-warrant requests on foreign terrorist suspects. Privacy advocates assert that the court is a “rubber stamp” for NSA surveillance orders, but D.C. District Court Judge John Bates took exception to that argument Tuesday.

“The participation of a privacy advocate is unnecessary — and could prove counterproductive — in the vast majority” of court matters, wrote Bates, also a former presiding judge on the FISA Court. “Given the nature of FISA proceedings, the participation of an advocate would neither create a truly adversarial process nor constructively assist the Courts in assessing the facts.”

The letter, released Tuesday in conjunction with more-extensive comments on proposed reforms to the court, was sent to Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein and others. It comes ahead of President Obama’s planned speech on Friday addressing calls for NSA reform. Feinstein has been one of the most vocal defenders of the NSA’s surveillance-gathering techniques since Edward Snowden began leaking documents about the scope of the programs last June.

The White House has been tight-lipped about what reforms the president will offer, but the installation of a public advocate on the FISA Court is viewed as one of the most likely concessions. Aides have repeatedly insisted that Obama is still making up his mind after a flurry of meetings with lawmakers, privacy advocates, and tech companies last week.

Bates, who is also the director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, continued: “Advocate involvement in run-of-the-mill FISA matters would substantially hamper the work of the Courts without providing any countervailing benefit in terms of privacy protection or otherwise.”

The FISA Court currently hears arguments from the government only in favor of surveillance, which NSA critics contend has led to a lack of fair and vigorous judicial oversight of the agency’s collection and use of bulk phone and Internet metadata.

Bates also argued that “public disclosure of Court decisions is not likely to enhance the public’s understanding of FISA implementation if the discussion of classified information within those opinions is withheld. Releasing freestanding summaries of Court opinions is likely to promote confusion and misunderstanding.”

He additionally cautioned that the Court should not be placed in an “oversight” role that “exceeds their constitutional responsibility to decide cases and controversies.”

What We're Following See More »
ADDING MOMENTUM
Sen. Corker Yes on Tax Bill
1 days ago
THE LATEST
AFTER CHANGES TO CHILD TAX
Rubio is a Yes on Tax Bill
1 days ago
THE LATEST
VOTE NEXT WEEK
GOP Tax Package Made Public 5:30 p.m.
1 days ago
THE LATEST
“I WELCOME AN OPPORTUNITY TO CLEAR MY NAME”
House Ethics Panel Investigates Rep. Kihuen for Sexual Harassment
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Ethics Committee announced Friday that it has opened an investigation into Rep. Ruben Kihuen. Two women have accused the Nevada Democrat of sexual harassment. Kihuen has welcomed an Ethics investigation, saying in a statement earlier this week, 'I believe in transparency. If Ethics wants to look at it, I welcome an opportunity to clear my name.'"

Source:
INCREASE AMOUNT REFUNDABLE TO $1,400
GOP Changes Child Tax Credit for Rubio’s Vote
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"The final Republican tax bill will increase the amount of the refundable Child Tax Credit to $1,400, Rep. Kristi Noem (R-S.D.) told reporters Friday, as leaders seek to win the vote of Sen. Marco Rubio. The refundable amount was $1,100 in the Senate-passed tax bill, but Rubio (R-Fla.) on Thursday said that wasn't good enough. He has threatened to vote against the bill unless the refundable amount of the credit is increased. It's unclear whether the change will be enough to satisfy him."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login