Judge: Arguing NSA Privacy Concerns in Court Is ‘Unnecessary’

A sign stands outside the National Security Administration (NSA) campus in Fort Meade, Md., Thursday, June 6, 2013.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
Jan. 14, 2014, 10:29 a.m.

Pla­cing a pri­vacy ad­voc­ate on the ju­di­cial body re­spons­ible for ap­prov­ing the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s for­eign sur­veil­lance or­ders is “un­ne­ces­sary” and po­ten­tially “coun­ter­pro­duct­ive,” a fed­er­al dis­trict court judge wrote to Con­gress this week.

The judge’s com­ments come amid a de­bate con­cern­ing the prop­er role of the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court, which over­sees the gov­ern­ment’s sur­veil­lance-war­rant re­quests on for­eign ter­ror­ist sus­pects. Pri­vacy ad­voc­ates as­sert that the court is a “rub­ber stamp” for NSA sur­veil­lance or­ders, but D.C. Dis­trict Court Judge John Bates took ex­cep­tion to that ar­gu­ment Tues­day.

“The par­ti­cip­a­tion of a pri­vacy ad­voc­ate is un­ne­ces­sary — and could prove coun­ter­pro­duct­ive — in the vast ma­jor­ity” of court mat­ters, wrote Bates, also a former presid­ing judge on the FISA Court. “Giv­en the nature of FISA pro­ceed­ings, the par­ti­cip­a­tion of an ad­voc­ate would neither cre­ate a truly ad­versari­al pro­cess nor con­struct­ively as­sist the Courts in as­sess­ing the facts.”

The let­ter, re­leased Tues­day in con­junc­tion with more-ex­tens­ive com­ments on pro­posed re­forms to the court, was sent to Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein and oth­ers. It comes ahead of Pres­id­ent Obama’s planned speech on Fri­day ad­dress­ing calls for NSA re­form. Fein­stein has been one of the most vo­cal de­fend­ers of the NSA’s sur­veil­lance-gath­er­ing tech­niques since Ed­ward Snowden began leak­ing doc­u­ments about the scope of the pro­grams last June.

The White House has been tight-lipped about what re­forms the pres­id­ent will of­fer, but the in­stall­a­tion of a pub­lic ad­voc­ate on the FISA Court is viewed as one of the most likely con­ces­sions. Aides have re­peatedly in­sisted that Obama is still mak­ing up his mind after a flurry of meet­ings with law­makers, pri­vacy ad­voc­ates, and tech com­pan­ies last week.

Bates, who is also the dir­ect­or of the Ad­min­is­trat­ive Of­fice of the U.S. Courts, con­tin­ued: “Ad­voc­ate in­volve­ment in run-of-the-mill FISA mat­ters would sub­stan­tially hamper the work of the Courts without provid­ing any coun­ter­vail­ing be­ne­fit in terms of pri­vacy pro­tec­tion or oth­er­wise.”

The FISA Court cur­rently hears ar­gu­ments from the gov­ern­ment only in fa­vor of sur­veil­lance, which NSA crit­ics con­tend has led to a lack of fair and vig­or­ous ju­di­cial over­sight of the agency’s col­lec­tion and use of bulk phone and In­ter­net metadata.

Bates also ar­gued that “pub­lic dis­clos­ure of Court de­cisions is not likely to en­hance the pub­lic’s un­der­stand­ing of FISA im­ple­ment­a­tion if the dis­cus­sion of clas­si­fied in­form­a­tion with­in those opin­ions is with­held. Re­leas­ing freest­and­ing sum­mar­ies of Court opin­ions is likely to pro­mote con­fu­sion and mis­un­der­stand­ing.”

He ad­di­tion­ally cau­tioned that the Court should not be placed in an “over­sight” role that “ex­ceeds their con­sti­tu­tion­al re­spons­ib­il­ity to de­cide cases and con­tro­ver­sies.”

What We're Following See More »
Republican Polling Shows Close Race
Roundup: National Polling Remains Inconsistent
1 hours ago

The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona

Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
3 hours ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
5 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Tying Republicans to Trump Now an Actionable Offense
7 hours ago

"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."

Former Congressman Schock Fined $10,000
7 hours ago

Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.