Obama’s No-Win Dilemma for Spy Reform

Reports detailing the president’s avenue for NSA reform ahead of his major speech Friday depict a president attempting to balance the concerns of numerous stakeholders. None may walk away fully satisfied.

US President Barack Obama speaks during a taping of TNT's Christmas in Washington at the National Building Museum in Washington on December 15, 2013.  
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Jan. 15, 2014, 5:30 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama will re­portedly out­line sev­er­al new re­straints on the gov­ern­ment’s abil­ity to col­lect and store vast amounts of data on U.S. cit­izens and for­eign­ers in a ma­jor speech Fri­day, but his ap­proach is un­likely to quell an on­go­ing push for broad­er sur­veil­lance re­form.

Obama is ex­pec­ted to re­duce the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s ac­cess to bulk tele­phone data, re­quest ad­di­tion­al pri­vacy pro­tec­tions for for­eign­ers, and pro­pose the in­stall­a­tion of a pub­lic ad­voc­ate on the secret For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court, which cur­rently hears ar­gu­ments only from the gov­ern­ment in fa­vor of sur­veil­lance. The NSA’s ac­cess to “rel­ev­ant” phone re­cords will be pared down from three steps re­moved from a ter­ror­ist sus­pect to just two steps, and the num­ber of years such data can be stored will likely be re­duced from the cur­rent five-year stand­ard.

In a let­ter to Con­gress re­leased Tues­day, a fed­er­al judge de­rided the idea of a pri­vacy ad­voc­ate as “un­ne­ces­sary” and pos­sibly “coun­ter­pro­duct­ive.” Also on Tues­day, the pres­id­ent’s hand-picked sur­veil­lance re­view task force test­i­fied be­fore the Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee in fa­vor of such an ad­voc­ate, a po­s­i­tion it pre­vi­ously out­lined in a re­port to Obama that iden­ti­fies 46 pos­sible re­forms.

The an­ti­cip­ated re­forms, re­por­ted by The New York Times and the As­so­ci­ated Press, largely align with many areas where ob­serv­ers have long ex­pec­ted the pres­id­ent would be be will­ing to budge. But not­ably ab­sent is a pro­pos­al to leave bulk data in the hands of private phone com­pan­ies or some oth­er third party or to re­quire court ap­prov­al for ac­cess to some busi­ness re­cords. Phone com­pan­ies are not eager to take on that re­spons­ib­il­ity and such a hy­po­thet­ic­al in­de­pend­ent group does not cur­rently ex­ist.

The path Obama is for­ging sug­gests he will turn to law­makers for help in de­cid­ing how broadly to in­ter­pret Sec­tion 215 of the post-9/11 USA Pat­ri­ot Act, which the gov­ern­ment has used as jus­ti­fic­a­tion for much of its data-gath­er­ing, and where such in­form­a­tion should be stored.

If the re­ports are true, Obama’s re­straints are likely to do little to si­lence NSA crit­ics, who have been call­ing for sub­stant­ive re­form since Ed­ward Snowden began leak­ing de­tails about the agency’s sur­veil­lance powers last June. Pres­sure on the White House to im­ple­ment re­form has long been mount­ing, but it reached a cres­cendo last month after Obama’s sur­veil­lance re­view board is­sued its re­com­mend­a­tions and a fed­er­al judge called the NSA’s metadata col­lec­tion “al­most Or­wellian” and a likely breach of the Fourth Amend­ment.

NSA of­fi­cials and law­makers sup­port­ing the agency’s pro­grams have re­peatedly jus­ti­fied them as ne­ces­sary to com­bat ever-evolving glob­al ter­ror threats. NSA chief Keith Al­ex­an­der told Con­gress last month that while the pro­grams have po­ten­tial to be “ex­tremely in­trust­ive” they are prop­erly checked against ab­uses in­tern­ally.

“The way we’ve put the over­sight and com­pli­ance and the re­gi­men we have around it “¦ en­sure that we’re do­ing this right,” Al­ex­an­der test­i­fied be­fore the Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee. “Nobody has come up with a bet­ter way for us to con­nect the dots.”

As re­cently as Tues­day, White House aides said the pres­id­ent was still iron­ing out the de­tails of ex­actly how far-reach­ing he wanted the re­forms to be. Law­makers push­ing le­gis­la­tion to co­di­fy re­stric­tions on the NSA have said they will con­tin­ue to do so no mat­ter what re­forms Obama an­nounces.

“All three branches of gov­ern­ment have said the NSA has gone too far,” said Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner, R-Wis., last week after he and 15 oth­er hand-picked law­makers sat down with Obama to dis­cuss NSA re­form. “This prob­lem can­not be solved by pres­id­en­tial fi­at.”

House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bob Good­latte, R-Va., who also at­ten­ded the White House meet­ing, ad­ded that “it’s in­creas­ingly clear that we need to take le­gis­lat­ive ac­tion to re­form” the NSA’s in­tel­li­gence gath­er­ing.

“We have pretty strong in­dic­a­tions that they will be cos­met­ic changes couched in re­form,” said Mark Jay­cox, a policy ana­lyst with the Elec­tron­ic Fron­ti­er Found­a­tion, which is call­ing for a strong over­haul of NSA sur­veil­lance prac­tices. “The pres­id­ent and the ad­min­is­tra­tion will want [the NSA de­bate] to end with the Fri­day speech,” but that’s not go­ing to hap­pen, he said.

Also on Wed­nes­day, The Times re­por­ted that the NSA is us­ing ra­dio waves to in­filt­rate com­puters world­wide (al­though, not­ably, not in the U.S.) to use tech­no­logy that al­lows the agency to con­trol data even when a breached com­puter is not con­nec­ted to the In­ter­net.

Obama is sched­uled to speak about his NSA re­form pro­pos­als at 11 a.m. Fri­day at the Justice De­part­ment.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4538) }}

What We're Following See More »
Trump to Meet with Ryan, Leadership Next Week
6 minutes ago

A day after saying he could not yet support Donald Trump's presidential bid, House Speaker Paul Ryan has invited the billionaire to a meeting in Washington next week with House leadership. Ryan and Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus will also meet separately with Trump. 

Obama on Trump: ‘This Is a Really Serious Job’
24 minutes ago

"President Obama used the White House podium on Friday to dismiss Donald Trump as an unserious candidate to succeed him, and said leading the country isn't a job that's suited to reality show antics." At a briefing with reporters, the president said, "I just want to emphasize the degree to which we are in serious times and this is a really serious job. This is not entertainment. This is not a reality show. This is a contest for the presidency of the United States. And what that means is that every candidate, every nominee needs to be subject to exacting standards and genuine scrutiny."

Panama Papers Spur White House to Crack Down on Evasion
2 hours ago

In the The White House on Thursday night unveiled a series of executive actions to combat money laundering—"among the most comprehensive response yet to the Panama Papers revelations." The president's orders will tighten transparency rules, close loopholes that allow "foreigners to hide financial activity behind anonymous entities in the U.S., and demand stricter “customer due diligence” rules for banks.

Who’s #NeverTrump Courting as Possible Candidates
2 hours ago

The #NeverTrump movement is now mulling the idea of recruiting a candidate to run as an independent or under a third-party banner. But who might it be? The Hill offers a preliminary list.

  • Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE)
  • Mitt Romney
  • 2012 (and perhaps 2016) Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson
  • Former Marine Gen. John Kelly
  • Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI)
  • Former Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK)
  • South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley
  • Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)
362,000 JOBS ADDED
‘Mildly Disappointing’ Jobs Report
3 hours ago

The U.S. economy added 160,000 jobs in April, a "mildly disappointing" result relative to the 200,000 expected, according to the New York Times' Neil Irwin. On the plus side, hourly earnings were up 2.5% from a year ago. But on the other hand, "the labor force shrank by 362,000 people and the labor force participation rate fell by 0.2 percentage points."