GOP Senator Eyes Tethering Keystone to Bill Obama Can’t Veto

Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., could be among the key votes as stakeholders seek to revive a stalled energy efficiency bill.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
Ben Geman
Jan. 15, 2014, 1:56 p.m.

The battle over the Key­stone XL pipeline could flare up again in Con­gress. And maybe soon.

Sen. John Ho­even said Wed­nes­day that back­ers of the oil-sands pipeline are weigh­ing ef­forts to at­tach the pro­ject to debt-ceil­ing le­gis­la­tion or an­oth­er must-pass bill.

“We would try to at­tach it to something that [Pres­id­ent Obama] would not veto,” Ho­even, a North Dakota Re­pub­lic­an and out­spoken ad­voc­ate of the pro­ject, told re­port­ers in a brief­ing.

He said le­gis­la­tion to raise the debt ceil­ing, which law­makers will con­sider in the com­ing weeks or months, is an op­tion. In­flu­en­tial GOP Rep. Paul Ry­an has also floated this idea. “There has already been dis­cus­sion of that as a pos­sib­il­ity,” Ho­even said.

But even some Key­stone back­ers bristled at the no­tion in an earli­er debt-ceil­ing battle.

And the polit­ic­al strategy has not been fi­nal­ized. “There’s any num­ber of bills that we have talked about but we would have to see,” Ho­even said.

Ho­even noted that “the first thing is to get [Obama] to make a de­cision.” But a spokes­man for the sen­at­or later said, “If the [White House] con­tin­ues to delay in­def­in­itely, we will pur­sue a le­gis­lat­ive solu­tion pri­or to a de­cision.”

There’s some pre­ced­ent for try­ing to teth­er a Key­stone pro­vi­sion to high-stakes fisc­al le­gis­la­tion.

In late 2011, Con­gress at­tached lan­guage to payroll-tax-cut le­gis­la­tion set­ting a dead­line for a Key­stone per­mit de­cision, prompt­ing Obama to re­ject the pipeline and in­vite de­veloper Tran­sCanada to re­apply (which they did).

Ho­even held a pro-Key­stone brief­ing Wed­nes­day with a pair of seni­or Ca­na­dian of­fi­cials: Gary Doer, the am­bas­sad­or to the United States, and Min­is­ter of For­eign Af­fairs John Baird.

The brief­ing was part of a lar­ger push for the pro­ject Wed­nes­day on Cap­it­ol Hill. The two Ca­na­dian of­fi­cials held a sep­ar­ate brief­ing with Sens. Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D., and Mary Landrieu, D-La.

Heitkamp warned that the longer the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s de­cision-mak­ing pro­cess drags on, the more sup­port there will be in Con­gress to take ac­tion on the pipeline.

“We’re con­cerned about miss­ing yet again an­oth­er con­struc­tion sea­son on the north­ern part of the pipeline, so as we get closer to los­ing that op­por­tun­ity I think you’re go­ing to see more and more dis­cus­sion in the United States Sen­ate about mov­ing Key­stone uni­lat­er­ally or without a de­cision from the pres­id­ent,” she said.

Key­stone has ma­jor­ity sup­port in both cham­bers.

Ho­even won 62 votes on a pro-Key­stone amend­ment dur­ing a budget de­bate last March, al­though a few Demo­crats later claimed that they hadn’t really cast an out­right pro-pipeline vote.

The pro­posed pipeline, which has been un­der Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion re­view for years, would bring crude oil from Al­berta’s oil sands to Gulf Coast re­finer­ies. It would also carry some oil from North Dakota’s boom­ing Bakken re­gion.

Back­ers — in­clud­ing ma­jor busi­ness groups and a num­ber of uni­ons — call it a way to boost en­ergy se­cur­ity and cre­ate jobs.

En­vir­on­ment­al groups and some Demo­crats (the caucus is di­vided) op­pose the pro­ject, call­ing it a cata­lyst for car­bon-in­tens­ive and eco­lo­gic­ally harm­ful oil-sands pro­jects.

But a draft State De­part­ment ana­lys­is last March found that either ap­prov­ing or re­ject­ing the pro­ject, con­trary to en­vir­on­ment­al­ists’ claims, would have very little ef­fect on the rate of oil-sands pro­duc­tion ex­pan­sion.

Key­stone op­pon­ents are push­ing State to re­verse that find­ing in the fi­nal ana­lys­is that could be re­leased shortly. Obama has said he will not ap­prove Key­stone un­less he’s con­fid­ent that the pipeline would not “sig­ni­fic­antly ex­acer­bate” car­bon emis­sions.

Clare Foran contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
$618 BILLION IN FUNDING
By a Big Margin, House Passes Defense Bill
22 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The National Defense Authorization Act passed the House this morning by a 375-34 vote. The bill, which heads to the Senate next week for final consideration, would fund the military to the tune of $618.7 billion, "about $3.2 billion more than the president requested for fiscal 2017. ... The White House has issued a veto threat on both the House and Senate-passed versions of the bill, but has not yet said if it will sign the compromise bill released by the conference committee this week."

Source:
SUCCEEDS UPTON
Walden to Chair Energy and Commerce Committee
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Republicans have elected Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) the next chairman of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee. Walden defeated Reps. John Shimkus (R-IL) and Joe Barton (R-TX), the former committee chairman, in the race for the gavel" to succeed Michgan's Fred Upton.

Source:
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT
Senators Looking to Limit Deportations Under Trump
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Democratic and Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are working on legislation that would limit deportations" under President-elect Donald Trump. Leading the effort are Judiciary Committee members Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) is also expected to sign on.

Source:
REQUIRES CHANGE IN LAW
Trump Taps Mattis for Defense Secretary
1 days ago
BREAKING

Donald Trump has selected retired Marine Gen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis as his secretary of defense, according to The Washington Post. Mattis retired from active duty just four years ago, so Congress will have "to pass new legislation to bypass a federal law that states secretaries of defense must not have been on active duty in the previous seven years." The official announcement is likely to come next week.

Source:
MEASURE HEADED TO OBAMA
Senate OKs 10-Year Extension of Iran Sanctions
1 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login