GOP Senator Eyes Tethering Keystone to Bill Obama Can’t Veto

Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., could be among the key votes as stakeholders seek to revive a stalled energy efficiency bill.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Jan. 15, 2014, 1:56 p.m.

The battle over the Key­stone XL pipeline could flare up again in Con­gress. And maybe soon.

Sen. John Ho­even said Wed­nes­day that back­ers of the oil-sands pipeline are weigh­ing ef­forts to at­tach the pro­ject to debt-ceil­ing le­gis­la­tion or an­oth­er must-pass bill.

“We would try to at­tach it to something that [Pres­id­ent Obama] would not veto,” Ho­even, a North Dakota Re­pub­lic­an and out­spoken ad­voc­ate of the pro­ject, told re­port­ers in a brief­ing.

He said le­gis­la­tion to raise the debt ceil­ing, which law­makers will con­sider in the com­ing weeks or months, is an op­tion. In­flu­en­tial GOP Rep. Paul Ry­an has also floated this idea. “There has already been dis­cus­sion of that as a pos­sib­il­ity,” Ho­even said.

But even some Key­stone back­ers bristled at the no­tion in an earli­er debt-ceil­ing battle.

And the polit­ic­al strategy has not been fi­nal­ized. “There’s any num­ber of bills that we have talked about but we would have to see,” Ho­even said.

Ho­even noted that “the first thing is to get [Obama] to make a de­cision.” But a spokes­man for the sen­at­or later said, “If the [White House] con­tin­ues to delay in­def­in­itely, we will pur­sue a le­gis­lat­ive solu­tion pri­or to a de­cision.”

There’s some pre­ced­ent for try­ing to teth­er a Key­stone pro­vi­sion to high-stakes fisc­al le­gis­la­tion.

In late 2011, Con­gress at­tached lan­guage to payroll-tax-cut le­gis­la­tion set­ting a dead­line for a Key­stone per­mit de­cision, prompt­ing Obama to re­ject the pipeline and in­vite de­veloper Tran­sCanada to re­apply (which they did).

Ho­even held a pro-Key­stone brief­ing Wed­nes­day with a pair of seni­or Ca­na­dian of­fi­cials: Gary Doer, the am­bas­sad­or to the United States, and Min­is­ter of For­eign Af­fairs John Baird.

The brief­ing was part of a lar­ger push for the pro­ject Wed­nes­day on Cap­it­ol Hill. The two Ca­na­dian of­fi­cials held a sep­ar­ate brief­ing with Sens. Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D., and Mary Landrieu, D-La.

Heitkamp warned that the longer the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s de­cision-mak­ing pro­cess drags on, the more sup­port there will be in Con­gress to take ac­tion on the pipeline.

“We’re con­cerned about miss­ing yet again an­oth­er con­struc­tion sea­son on the north­ern part of the pipeline, so as we get closer to los­ing that op­por­tun­ity I think you’re go­ing to see more and more dis­cus­sion in the United States Sen­ate about mov­ing Key­stone uni­lat­er­ally or without a de­cision from the pres­id­ent,” she said.

Key­stone has ma­jor­ity sup­port in both cham­bers.

Ho­even won 62 votes on a pro-Key­stone amend­ment dur­ing a budget de­bate last March, al­though a few Demo­crats later claimed that they hadn’t really cast an out­right pro-pipeline vote.

The pro­posed pipeline, which has been un­der Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion re­view for years, would bring crude oil from Al­berta’s oil sands to Gulf Coast re­finer­ies. It would also carry some oil from North Dakota’s boom­ing Bakken re­gion.

Back­ers — in­clud­ing ma­jor busi­ness groups and a num­ber of uni­ons — call it a way to boost en­ergy se­cur­ity and cre­ate jobs.

En­vir­on­ment­al groups and some Demo­crats (the caucus is di­vided) op­pose the pro­ject, call­ing it a cata­lyst for car­bon-in­tens­ive and eco­lo­gic­ally harm­ful oil-sands pro­jects.

But a draft State De­part­ment ana­lys­is last March found that either ap­prov­ing or re­ject­ing the pro­ject, con­trary to en­vir­on­ment­al­ists’ claims, would have very little ef­fect on the rate of oil-sands pro­duc­tion ex­pan­sion.

Key­stone op­pon­ents are push­ing State to re­verse that find­ing in the fi­nal ana­lys­is that could be re­leased shortly. Obama has said he will not ap­prove Key­stone un­less he’s con­fid­ent that the pipeline would not “sig­ni­fic­antly ex­acer­bate” car­bon emis­sions.

Clare Foran contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
PROCEDURES NOT FOLLOWED
Trump Not on Ballot in Minnesota
2 days ago
THE LATEST
MOB RULE?
Trump on Immigration: ‘I Don’t Know, You Tell Me’
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Perhaps Donald Trump can take a plebiscite to solve this whole messy immigration thing. At a Fox News town hall with Sean Hannity last night, Trump essentially admitted he's "stumped," turning to the audience and asking: “Can we go through a process or do you think they have to get out? Tell me, I mean, I don’t know, you tell me.”

Source:
BIG CHANGE FROM WHEN HE SELF-FINANCED
Trump Enriching His Businesses with Donor Money
4 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "nearly quintupled the monthly rent his presidential campaign pays for its headquarters at Trump Tower to $169,758 in July, when he was raising funds from donors, compared with March, when he was self-funding his campaign." A campaign spokesman "said the increased office space was needed to accommodate an anticipated increase in employees," but the campaign's paid staff has actually dipped by about 25 since March. The campaign has also paid his golf courses and restaurants about $260,000 since mid-May.

Source:
QUESTIONS OVER IMMIGRATION POLICY
Trump Cancels Rallies
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Donald Trump probably isn't taking seriously John Oliver's suggestion that he quit the race. But he has canceled or rescheduled rallies amid questions over his stance on immigration. Trump rescheduled a speech on the topic that he was set to give later this week. Plus, he's also nixed planned rallies in Oregon and Las Vegas this month.

Source:
‘STRATEGY AND MESSAGING’
Sean Hannity Is Also Advising Trump
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Donald Trump's Fox News brain trust keeps growing. After it was revealed that former Fox chief Roger Ailes is informally advising Trump on debate preparation, host Sean Hannity admitted over the weekend that he's also advising Trump on "strategy and messaging." He told the New York Times: “I’m not hiding the fact that I want Donald Trump to be the next president of the United States. I never claimed to be a journalist.”

Source:
×