Senate Republicans are launching a legislative attack against President Obama’s climate-change agenda on the same day it faces scrutiny from a Senate committee.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., is invoking a rarely used legislative tool to try to block EPA’s climate-change regulations.
McConnell, who faces a tough reelection campaign this year, filed on Thursday a resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act to nullify the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed rule clamping down on carbon emissions of the nation’s power plants. This move could force a Senate vote within the next couple of months on the cornerstone of President Obama’s climate-change agenda.
The CRA, used successfully just once since its creation in 1996, allows senators to bypass the majority leader and force an up-or-down vote requiring only 51 votes to pass to stop regulations. Senate Republicans have tried — but failed — to use this legislative tool for other EPA regulations over the past couple of years.
A legal snag with this particular EPA rule that McConnell is seeking to undo is that the CRA can only be used against recently finalized regulations, not those in proposed form, which this one is. However, some conservative legal scholars have speculated that this rule may have an immediate legal impact, and thus could be considered “final” for these purposes. McConnell sent a letter Thursday to the Government and Accountability Office seeking legal clarification on this matter.
“EPA issued the Proposed GHG Rule under a very unusual provision of the Clean Air Act that gives immediate legal effect to the notice of proposed rulemaking,” McConnell writes in the letter, obtained by National Journal.
Under the CRA, a senator can force a vote to block rules within 60 (legislative) days since those rules were published in the Federal Register. EPA did so with its proposed climate regulations last week.
McConnell filed the resolution on the same day EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and other administration officials testified before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on the agency’s climate-change regulations.
What We're Following See More »
The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona
Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.
"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."
"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."
Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.