EPA Scrambles to Bolster Challenged Climate Rule

The smoke stacks at American Electric Power's (AEP) Mountaineer coal power plant in New Haven, West Virginia, October 30, 2009. In cooperation with AEP, the French company Alstom unveiled the world's largest carbon capture facility at a coal plant, so called 'clean coal,' which will store around 100,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide a year 2,1 kilometers (7,200 feet) underground.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
Ben Geman
Jan. 16, 2014, 10:36 a.m.

The Environmental Protection Agency is seeking to shore up high-profile carbon-emissions rules for coal-fired power plants against GOP claims that they violate a major 2005 energy law.

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said Thursday that her agency is preparing to release detailed information that will provide more “clarity” on the topic.

“We are going to address that issue specifically,” she told the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee of EPA’s planned “notice of data availability.” McCarthy said EPA has sent the notice to the White House Office of Management and Budget for review.

Here’s what the fight is about:

EPA proposed regulations in September requiring that future coal-fired power plants use technology that traps a substantial amount of their carbon emissions.

The agency has repeatedly pointed to a few Energy Department-backed power projects, including a Southern Co. coal plant under construction in Mississippi, when arguing that the technology is ready for commercial deployment at coal plants.

But Republicans say that EPA’s reliance on these projects to justify the rule violates provisions in the massive 2005 energy law that support low-emissions coal projects.

The law says that no technology can form the basis for certain EPA rules “solely” because it’s employed at facilities funded under the Energy Department’s “Clean Coal Power Initiative” or receive “clean” coal tax credits.

“This is very concerning because this is a direct legal conflict,” Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana, the Senate Environment panel’s top Republican, told McCarthy at a committee hearing Thursday.

House Republicans and the state of Nebraska (which filed a lawsuit Wednesday) have raised the same allegations about the carbon-emissions rules for power plants proposed last year. “I think this concern is underscored by the fact that litigation has now been filed over this direct legal conflict,” Vitter said.

Republicans, disputing EPA, say the carbon rules are based on technology that’s nowhere near ready for widespread deployment, and they argue that the rule will hurt the coal industry and cost jobs.

But McCarthy told lawmakers that the coal-plant standards are based on evidence about the feasibility of the carbon-trapping technology that’s more extensive than just the few projects covered under the 2005 law’s restriction. On Thursday, she said that the basis for the carbon-emissions rules proposed last year goes “well beyond” those projects and that “we are very comfortable with the standard that we have proposed.”

“There is nothing in the law that precludes us from considering those [projects] in the context of a larger, more robust data set,” she said.

EPA is vowing to provide details about why the rule doesn’t collide with the 2005 law.

“EPA is making additional information available on the proposed Carbon Pollution Standards. Specifically, EPA will issue a notice of data availability that will provide analysis and information related to the Energy Policy Act of 2005,” the agency said Thursday.

What We're Following See More »
Mississippi Governor Signs Bill to Ban Abortions After 15 Weeks
11 hours ago
China Tariffs May Be Even Bigger Than Originally Proposed
11 hours ago

"President Trump is preparing to impose a package of $60 billion in annual tariffs against China, following through on a long-time threat that he says will punish China for intellectual property infringement and create more American jobs. The tariff package, which Trump plans to unveil by Friday, was confirmed by four senior administration officials. Senior aides had presented Trump with a $30 billion tariff package that would apply to a range of products, but Trump directed them to roughly double the scope of the new trade levies."

Trump Attorneys Have Offered Documents to Mueller’s Team
12 hours ago

"President Trump’s attorneys have provided the special counsel’s office with written descriptions that chronicle key moments under investigation in hopes of curtailing the scope of a presidential interview, according to two people familiar with the situation. Trump’s legal team recently shared the documents in an effort to limit any session between the president and special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to a few select topics" on order to "minimize his exposure. ... The lawyers are worried that Trump, who has a penchant for making erroneous claims, would be vulnerable in an hours-long interview."

Trump Isn’t Firing Mueller, Lawyer Says
20 hours ago

White House Lawyer Ty Cobb said that President Trump not considering firing special counsel Robert Mueller. Speculation swirled after Trump attacked the investigation on Twitter, and called out Mueller directly for the first time. “In response to media speculation and related questions being posed to the Administration," Cobb said, "...the President is not considering or discussing the firing of the Special Counsel, Robert Mueller." Several members of Congress, "including some top Republicans, warned Trump to not even think about terminating Mueller."

Rubio Says McCabe Should Have Been Allowed to Retire
1 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.