Battle Over EPA Smog Rule Intensifies

Silhouetted against the sky at dusk, emissions spew from the smokestacks at Westar Energy's Jeffrey Energy Center coal-fired power plant near St. Mary's, Kan. Saturday, Sept. 25, 2010.  (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ben Geman
Jan. 22, 2014, 1:37 a.m.

En­vir­on­ment­al and pub­lic health groups want a fed­er­al court to force the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency to is­sue tough­er stand­ards for smog-form­ing pol­lu­tion.

The Amer­ic­an Lung As­so­ci­ation, the Nat­ur­al Re­sources De­fense Coun­cil, and oth­er groups in a court fil­ing Tues­day, ask a fed­er­al judge to re­quire EPA to pro­pose new ozone stand­ards by Dec. 1, 2014, and fin­ish them 10 months later.

“The longer Amer­ic­ans must wait for the EPA to strengthen the stand­ards, the longer they must breathe air pol­lu­tion that shortens their lives, wor­sens lung dis­ease, makes it harder for them to breathe, and threatens car­di­ovas­cu­lar harm,” the Amer­ic­an Lung As­so­ci­ation said in a state­ment Tues­day even­ing.

The fil­ing is the latest twist in the in­tense, years-long leg­al and lob­by­ing battle over EPA ozone reg­u­la­tions. It’s a fight that has drawn high-level White House in­volve­ment over the past sev­er­al years.

Pres­id­ent Obama, in 2011, scuttled EPA plans to toughen George W. Bush-era stand­ards but noted that EPA would re­vis­it the rules in 2013.

The 2011 White House ac­tion fol­lowed heavy lob­by­ing by in­dustry groups, such as the Na­tion­al As­so­ci­ation of Man­u­fac­tur­ers, that say fur­ther tight­en­ing of the rules would hobble the eco­nomy.

EPA, un­der the Clean Air Act, must re­view ozone stand­ards every five years.

The green groups’ fil­ing Tues­day with the U.S. Dis­trict Court for the North­ern Dis­trict of Cali­for­nia says com­ple­tion of that re­view is over­due.

It notes that ozone rules were last pro­mul­gated in mid-March of 2008 and that “there is no dis­pute that EPA has failed to com­plete its re­view.”

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
4 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
4 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
6 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
6 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login