This Is Rand Paul’s Moment

The Kentucky Republican struck out on his own in his response to the State of the Union. Here’s why.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) speaks to members of the media on January 9, 2014 at the White House in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Matt Berman
Jan. 29, 2014, midnight

The United States is hav­ing a liber­tari­an mo­ment. And Rand Paul is get­ting ready to cap­ture it by him­self.

The Ken­tucky Re­pub­lic­an de­livered his own re­sponse to Pres­id­ent Obama’s State of the Uni­on on Tues­day night via You­Tube. But the re­but­tal wasn’t so much about what Obama said Tues­day as much as it was an open­ing salvo for a pos­sible 2016 pres­id­en­tial cam­paign, the bulk of it com­ing as a dir­ec­ted ar­gu­ment against big gov­ern­ment.

“Gov­ern­ment doesn’t cre­ate jobs very well,” Paul said. “Gov­ern­ment is in­her­ently bad at pick­ing win­ners and losers … if gov­ern­ment is to send money to cer­tain people to cre­ate busi­nesses, they will more of­ten than not pick the wrong people, and no jobs will be cre­ated.” He poin­ted spe­cific­ally to the old big gov­ern­ment bo­gey­man, Solyn­dra.

“It’s not that gov­ern­ment’s in­her­ently stu­pid, al­though it’s a de­bat­able point,” Paul said. “It’s that gov­ern­ment doesn’t get the same sig­nals.”

Paul’s Tues­day speech wasn’t sponsored by the GOP (that hon­or went to Cathy Mc­Mor­ris Ro­gers) or the tea party (that was Sen. Mike Lee’s job). The per­son­al­ized setup provided for a much more visu­ally ap­peal­ing de­liv­ery, com­plete with con­trolled light­ing and a lectern. A year after giv­ing the of­fi­cial tea-party re­sponse, Paul has struck out on his own.

The move makes sense. A Tues­day NBC News/Wall Street Journ­al poll found that twice as many Amer­ic­ans feel neg­at­ively about the Re­pub­lic­an Party than feel pos­it­ively. As a politi­cian, why tie your­self to that stand­ard when you can use your own, already-mo­bil­ized base to go it alone, at least be­fore primary sea­son really kicks up?

And there’s plenty reas­on to think Paul is per­fectly placed to cap­ture a slice of the cur­rent Amer­ic­an agita. Con­sider this: What’s the greatest, most ex­ist­en­tial threat to the United States — big busi­ness, big labor, or big gov­ern­ment? In Decem­ber, a re­cord 72 per­cent said big gov­ern­ment in a Gal­lup Poll, blow­ing past busi­ness (21 per­cent) and labor (5 per­cent). The ma­jor­it­ies hold des­pite polit­ics, but 92 per­cent of self-iden­ti­fied Re­pub­lic­ans cite big gov­ern­ment as the biggest threat to the fu­ture of Amer­ica.

Think of Rand Paul as the anti-Bill de Bla­sio. In his Tues­day speech, Paul slammed the “polit­ics of envy” and sug­ges­ted that if you “pun­ish” the suc­cess­ful, their com­pan­ies will flee over­seas. He pushed a some­what anti-wel­fare mes­sage, high­light­ing the story of the an­ti­gay, fringey Star Park­er, who says she once used her wel­fare money on drugs be­fore turn­ing her life around. While New York­ers are highly op­tim­ist­ic about de Bla­sio just a few weeks in­to his lib­er­al may­or­alty, Paul’s tak­ing the bet that what flies in New York won’t fly in the coun­try over­all. Again, there’s a polit­ic­al lo­gic here: While 67 per­cent of Demo­crats say gov­ern­ment should do “a lot” to re­duce poverty, only 27 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans agree.

By all ac­counts, Paul is gun­ning for the top spot. In his Tues­day night re­sponse, Paul made policy pro­pos­als of his own, in­clud­ing those for eco­nom­ic free­dom aones that would be set up around the U.S. and have, among oth­er things, a flat 5 per­cent in­come and busi­ness tax. “I be­lieve in an Amer­ica where people are free to make their own de­cisions,” he said.

And earli­er in the day, he took digs at the pos­sible com­pet­i­tion. At Tues­day’s State of the Net con­fer­ence in D.C., Paul bashed former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton as a “big pro­ponent of the sur­veil­lance state,” and sug­ges­ted that a liber­tari­an-lean­ing Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ate in 2016 could “com­pletely trans­form where people think they are and what party people think they have al­le­gi­ance for.”

It’s an early 2016 cam­paign shot, and it’s not off base, either. Gov­ern­ment was men­tioned as the most im­port­ant prob­lem in the U.S. across all party IDs in a re­cent Gal­lup Poll, cited by 18 per­cent of Demo­crats. A whop­ping 65 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans say they’re dis­sat­is­fied with the U.S. sys­tem of gov­ern­ment and its ef­fect­ive­ness. However, many of the people who are up­set over cur­rent gov­ern­ment ef­fect­ive­ness are also surely no fans of the fili­bus­ter­ing Paul.

Paul’s speech was broad­cast on­line in­stead of aired on na­tion­al tele­vi­sion, and it’s not the sort of thing that’s go­ing to change the sen­at­or’s fate on its own. But this in­de­pend­ently run, rad­ic­ally small-gov­ern­ment mes­sage is just an­oth­er stake Paul is lay­ing on a seem­ingly in­ev­it­able path to­ward a pres­id­en­tial cam­paign. Com­bine this with his im­press­ive on-the-ground in­fra­struc­ture and or­gan­iz­a­tion, and he’s quickly be­com­ing a ma­jor force for 2016.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.