The Defense Department won’t propose any retirement changes during its 2015 fiscal year budget request, Defense officials said Tuesday.
“We won’t propose anything on retirement benefits in 2015, we are waiting for and working with the commission,” said Christine Fox, the acting deputy Defense secretary at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, when asked about potential changes in the upcoming budget request.
The Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission will turn in a report by February 2015 that will recommend changes to the military’s compensation and retirement structure. The report was supposed to be turned in by May, but the National Defense Authorization Act passed last year extended the commission’s deadline.
Admiral James “Sandy” Winnefeld, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, agreed with Fox, adding that any changes to retirement should include a “holistic” approach, that he said the commission is taking.
A provision in the budget agreement that cut military pensions for working-age retirees gained quick backlash by members of Congress in both parties. It included a 1 percent cut to cost-of-living adjustments over 10 years, saving the Defense Department approximately $6 billion.
Members of Congress restored the COLA funding for medically-retired military veterans under the omnibus bill, but that is less than a tenth of the total funding.
Fox said that no Defense Department officials were consulted on the decision to include the COLA cuts as part of the budget agreement. And that if the rest of the funding isn’t restored, the Defense Department would push for current service members and retirees to be grandfathered in so they would be exempt from the cuts. Any changes made by the commission next year would also include grandfathering.
Both Republican and Democratic senators on the committee predicted that the full funding would be restored quickly. Chairman Carl Levin said he expects the committee “will have the ability to act promptly” on a bill.
A proposal by Senators Mark Pryor and Kay Hagan has been referred to the Armed Services Committee. It does not include an offset. The Democratic duo’s bill is one of more than a dozen proposals that have been introduced to restore the funding. Many recommend paying for the funding with politically polarizing issues that will make the legislation practically impossible to pass.
Sen. Roger Wicker warned against delaying restoring the funds, adding that without quick action “it holds the potential that it will be like sequestration, and go into effect despite everyone’s protestations to the contrary.”
And Defense officials hesitated to dictate when Congress should restore the funding, with Winnefeld saying “the timing is completely up to the Congress,” as long as the 1-percent cut “is not taken off the table permanently for the commission.”
What We're Following See More »
U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."
President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.
"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."
The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.